Hubbell EBITDA vs. Net Income
| HUBB Stock | USD 503.20 -2.42 -0.48% |
EBITDA | First Reported 2010-12-31 | Previous Quarter 1.3 B | Current Value 1.4 B | Quarterly Volatility 346.3 M |
Macro event markers
| Current Value | Last Year | Change From Last Year | 10 Year Trend | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Profit Margin | 0.35 | 0.3546 |
|
| |||||
| Net Profit Margin | 0.0763 | 0.1518 |
|
| |||||
| Operating Profit Margin | 0.11 | 0.2083 |
|
| |||||
| Pretax Profit Margin | 0.14 | 0.1915 |
|
| |||||
| Return On Assets | 0.11 | 0.1078 |
|
| |||||
| Return On Equity | 0.14 | 0.2305 |
|
|
Margin and return metrics for Hubbell describe how earnings relate to the capital employed. The profitability framework captures how margins evolve alongside revenue and cost dynamics.
Segment Revenue Snapshot
Hubbell's revenue is distributed across 2 distinct product categories. Utility Solutions Segment leads at 935.9 Million, representing roughly 62.7% of the total, followed by Electrical Segment at 556.8 Million (37.3%). Revenue concentration above 60% in one segment means Hubbell's performance is closely tied to that product's market dynamics.
Risk vs Return Analysis.
Macro event markers
Hubbell Revenue by Earnings Segment Snapshot
This chart illustrates Hubbell's revenue composition by product line based on the latest available data. At 37.3%, Electrical Segment is the narrowest segment in Hubbell's product mix.
Consensus earnings data provides a reference point for evaluating Hubbell over time. All metrics are derived from available inputs and shown for reference.
Quarterly Earnings Growth 0.138 | Dividend Share 5.38 | Earnings Share 16.53 | Revenue Per Share | Quarterly Revenue Growth 0.119 |
Investors evaluate Hubbell using market value and book value, each describing different facets of the business. All metrics are derived from available inputs and shown for reference.
Value and price for Hubbell are related but not identical, and they can diverge across cycles. The quoted Hubbell price is the exchange level where supply meets demand.
Hubbell Net Income vs. EBITDA Fundamental Analysis
Multiples-driven valuation compares Hubbell across sector performance standards. Hubbell is rated below average in ebitda among leading competitors. It is rated below average in net income among leading competitors making up about 0.66 of Net Income per EBITDA. At 1.52 , Hubbell's EBITDA-to-Net Income multiple reflects the spread between these metrics. EBITDA is evolving in line with broader financial reporting trends. It was pegged at 1.34 Billion in the prior reporting cycle. The P/E ratio measures Hubbell's earnings power relative to sector benchmarks.Hubbell Net Income vs. EBITDA
EBITDA stands for earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization. It is a measure of a company's operating cash flow based on data from the company's income statement and is a very good way to compare companies within industries or across different sectors. However, unlike Operating Cash Flow, EBITDA does not include the effects of changes in working capital.
Hubbell |
| = | 1.34 B |
In a nutshell, EBITDA is calculated by adding back each of the excluded items to the post-tax profit, and can be used to compare companies with very different capital structures.
Net income is the profit of a company for the reporting period, which is derived after taking revenues and gains and subtracting all expenses and losses. Net income is one of the most-watched numbers by money managers as well as individual investors.
Hubbell |
| = | 887.1 M |
Because income is reported on the Income Statement of a company and is measured in dollars some investors prefer to use Profit Margin, which measures income as a percentage of sales.
Hubbell Net Income Comparison
Hubbell is currently under evaluation in net income among leading competitors.
Hubbell Profitability Projections
For investors looking at Hubbell, profit analysis shows whether the company can build lasting value. The direction and pace of Hubbell's profit changes give forward-looking signals for investors. Hubbell currently maintains a profit margin of 15.2%. A rising trend is seen as positive, while a falling one is bad news for long-term investors. The operating margin stands at 19.1% while return on equity is 24.5%. The patterns here help investors see whether Hubbell's profits are growing or at risk of decline. Recent net income of 887.1 M reflects the bottom-line result of these profitability dynamics.
| Last Reported | End Of Year Estimate | ||
| Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income | -314.8 M | -299.1 M | |
| Operating Income | 1.2 B | 1.3 B | |
| Income Before Tax | 1.1 B | 1.2 B | |
| Total Other Income Expense Net | -98.3 M | -93.4 M | |
| Net Income | 887.1 M | 931.5 M | |
| Income Tax Expense | 227.2 M | 238.6 M | |
| Net Income Applicable To Common Shares | 627.8 M | 659.2 M | |
| Net Income From Continuing Ops | 891.9 M | 459.8 M | |
| Non Operating Income Net Other | 4 M | 4.3 M | |
| Interest Income | 78.1 M | 55.9 M | |
| Net Interest Income | -64.1 M | -67.3 M | |
| Change To Netincome | -54.7 M | -52 M | |
| Net Income Per Share | 16.67 | 17.50 | |
| Income Quality | 1.16 | 1.56 | |
| Net Income Per E B T | 0.79 | 0.58 |
Hubbell Profitability Driver Comparison
Profitability drivers for Hubbell are the factors with the greatest impact on its earnings and margins. Unexpected events such as policy changes, commodity shocks, or downturns can alter Hubbell's profit outlook. Investors who understand Hubbell's key profit drivers can better assess the sustainability of its earnings.
Earnings Estimation Breakdown
Analyst consensus for Hubbell sets the next projected EPS at 3.9, with estimates ranging from 3.63 on the low end to 4.15 on the high end. This range reflects the degree of analyst disagreement about Hubbell's near-term earnings trajectory. The estimate is based on trailing twelve-month data and excludes non-recurring items that could distort the underlying earnings trend.Last Reported EPS
3.63 Lowest | Expected EPS | 4.15 Highest |
Earnings Projection Consensus
For Hubbell, when the consensus earnings-based valuation exceeds the live market price, some investors see this as a potential long opportunity. When the market price runs ahead of the estimate, downside risk may be elevated if expectations soften. These scenario-based signals are most useful when combined with fundamental analysis and sector positioning.
| Number of Analysts | Historical Accuracy | Last Reported EPS | Estimated EPS for 31st of March 2026 | Current EPS (TTM) | |
| 16 | 93.18% | 4.73 | 3.9 | 16.53 |
Earnings History
Wall Street analyst consensus for Hubbell aggregates EPS forecasts from multiple independent research teams. These estimates serve as a market benchmark - actual results are judged relative to what analysts expected, not in absolute terms. Pairing EPS consensus with valuation multiples and cash flow metrics gives a more complete investment picture.Hubbell Quarterly Gross Profit | 527.9 Million |
Mean reversion analysis in Hubbell's involves identifying price extremes that diverge materially from the historical norm. High prices may deter value investors, while unusually low prices often attract buyers anticipating a recovery. Mean reversion in Hubbell is distinct from trend following, which rides momentum rather than betting on reversals.
Earnings per Share Projection vs Actual
Actual EPS for Hubbell captures the per-share profitability delivered by the business during the completed quarter. Expected EPS for Hubbell is the analyst community's advance estimate of this figure, shaped by guidance and sector research. A sustained increase in Hubbell's EPS over time generally reflects improving operational performance and earnings quality.Estimated Months Earnings per Share
For yield-focused investors, Hubbell's EPS provides a forward-looking signal on whether dividends will grow, hold, or face pressure. High EPS relative to dividends implies a conservative payout ratio and room for future increases. EPS should not be used in isolation - pair it with cash yield, debt service coverage, and industry-relative performance metrics.Quarterly Analyst Estimates and Surprise Metrics
Near-term price volatility for Hubbell is frequently tied to the gap between reported and expected EPS. Markets absorb this information rapidly, with price often overshooting before stabilizing around revised fundamentals. The analyst consensus heading into the report is built from iterative model updates and guidance interpretation.
| Reported | Fiscal Date | Estimated EPS | Reported EPS | Surprise | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2026-02-02 | 2025-12-31 | 4.7215 | 4.73 | 0.0085 | 0 | ||
2025-10-28 | 2025-09-30 | 4.99 | 5.17 | 0.18 | 3 | ||
2025-07-29 | 2025-06-30 | 4.4 | 4.93 | 0.53 | 12 | ||
2025-05-01 | 2025-03-31 | 3.72 | 3.5 | -0.22 | 5 | ||
2025-02-04 | 2024-12-31 | 4.02 | 4.1 | 0.08 | 1 | ||
2024-10-29 | 2024-09-30 | 4.46 | 4.49 | 0.03 | 0 | ||
2024-07-30 | 2024-06-30 | 4.24 | 4.37 | 0.13 | 3 | ||
2024-04-30 | 2024-03-31 | 3.54 | 3.6 | 0.06 | 1 | ||
2024-01-30 | 2023-12-31 | 3.58 | 3.69 | 0.11 | 3 | ||
2023-10-31 | 2023-09-30 | 4.05 | 3.95 | -0.1 | 2 | ||
2023-07-25 | 2023-06-30 | 3.72 | 4.07 | 0.35 | 9 | ||
2023-04-25 | 2023-03-31 | 2.47 | 3.61 | 1.14 | 46 | ||
2023-01-31 | 2022-12-31 | 2.38 | 2.6 | 0.22 | 9 | ||
2022-10-25 | 2022-09-30 | 2.71 | 2.88 | 0.17 | 6 | ||
2022-07-26 | 2022-06-30 | 2.41 | 2.81 | 0.4 | 16 | ||
2022-04-26 | 2022-03-31 | 1.85 | 2.12 | 0.27 | 14 | ||
2022-02-03 | 2021-12-31 | 2.1 | 2.07 | -0.03 | 1 | ||
2021-10-26 | 2021-09-30 | 2.34 | 2.24 | -0.1 | 4 | ||
2021-07-27 | 2021-06-30 | 2.16 | 2.36 | 0.2 | 9 | ||
2021-04-27 | 2021-03-31 | 1.65 | 1.72 | 0.07 | 4 | ||
2021-02-02 | 2020-12-31 | 1.77 | 1.76 | -0.01 | 0 | ||
2020-10-27 | 2020-09-30 | 2 | 2.3 | 0.3 | 15 | ||
2020-07-30 | 2020-06-30 | 1.61 | 1.87 | 0.26 | 16 | ||
2020-04-30 | 2020-03-31 | 1.52 | 1.64 | 0.12 | 7 | ||
2020-02-04 | 2019-12-31 | 1.85 | 1.91 | 0.06 | 3 | ||
2019-10-29 | 2019-09-30 | 2.27 | 2.34 | 0.07 | 3 | ||
2019-07-30 | 2019-06-30 | 2.16 | 2.31 | 0.15 | 6 | ||
2019-04-30 | 2019-03-31 | 1.51 | 1.57 | 0.06 | 3 | ||
2019-02-05 | 2018-12-31 | 1.7 | 1.72 | 0.02 | 1 | ||
2018-10-23 | 2018-09-30 | 2.1 | 2.22 | 0.12 | 5 | ||
2018-07-24 | 2018-06-30 | 1.79 | 1.97 | 0.18 | 10 | ||
2018-04-24 | 2018-03-31 | 1.36 | 1.39 | 0.03 | 2 | ||
2018-01-30 | 2017-12-31 | 1.42 | 1.5 | 0.08 | 5 | ||
2017-10-24 | 2017-09-30 | 1.5 | 1.59 | 0.09 | 6 | ||
2017-07-25 | 2017-06-30 | 1.41 | 1.43 | 0.02 | 1 | ||
2017-04-25 | 2017-03-31 | 1.11 | 1.13 | 0.02 | 1 | ||
2017-01-31 | 2016-12-31 | 1.23 | 1.16 | -0.07 | 5 | ||
2016-10-25 | 2016-09-30 | 1.5 | 1.56 | 0.06 | 4 | ||
2016-07-26 | 2016-06-30 | 1.43 | 1.45 | 0.02 | 1 | ||
2016-04-26 | 2016-03-31 | 1.07 | 1.08 | 0.01 | 0 | ||
2016-01-28 | 2015-12-31 | 1.17 | 1.23 | 0.06 | 5 | ||
2015-10-22 | 2015-09-30 | 1.31 | 1.4 | 0.09 | 6 | ||
2015-07-23 | 2015-06-30 | 1.34 | 1.37 | 0.03 | 2 | ||
2015-04-23 | 2015-03-31 | 1.05 | 1.07 | 0.02 | 1 | ||
2015-01-29 | 2014-12-31 | 1.26 | 1.38 | 0.12 | 9 | ||
2014-10-23 | 2014-09-30 | 1.5 | 1.51 | 0.01 | 0 | ||
2014-07-22 | 2014-06-30 | 1.51 | 1.51 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2014-04-22 | 2014-03-31 | 1.07 | 1.08 | 0.01 | 0 | ||
2014-01-28 | 2013-12-31 | 1.36 | 1.38 | 0.02 | 1 | ||
2013-10-17 | 2013-09-30 | 1.6 | 1.62 | 0.02 | 1 | ||
2013-07-18 | 2013-06-30 | 1.31 | 1.37 | 0.06 | 4 | ||
2013-04-18 | 2013-03-31 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2013-01-24 | 2012-12-31 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2012-10-18 | 2012-09-30 | 1.44 | 1.45 | 0.01 | 0 | ||
2012-07-19 | 2012-06-30 | 1.23 | 1.29 | 0.06 | 4 | ||
2012-04-19 | 2012-03-31 | 0.97 | 1.05 | 0.08 | 8 | ||
2012-01-26 | 2011-12-31 | 1.1 | 1.17 | 0.07 | 6 | ||
2011-10-20 | 2011-09-30 | 1.28 | 1.37 | 0.09 | 7 | ||
2011-07-21 | 2011-06-30 | 1.05 | 1.07 | 0.02 | 1 | ||
2011-04-21 | 2011-03-31 | 0.8 | 0.82 | 0.02 | 2 | ||
2011-01-27 | 2010-12-31 | 0.9 | 0.96 | 0.06 | 6 | ||
2010-10-21 | 2010-09-30 | 1.01 | 1.18 | 0.17 | 16 | ||
2010-07-22 | 2010-06-30 | 0.77 | 0.95 | 0.18 | 23 | ||
2010-04-22 | 2010-03-31 | 0.69 | 0.64 | -0.05 | 7 | ||
2010-01-28 | 2009-12-31 | 0.73 | 0.84 | 0.11 | 15 | ||
2009-10-22 | 2009-09-30 | 0.71 | 1.01 | 0.3 | 42 | ||
2009-07-22 | 2009-06-30 | 0.64 | 0.7 | 0.06 | 9 | ||
2009-04-23 | 2009-03-31 | 0.54 | 0.6 | 0.06 | 11 | ||
2009-01-28 | 2008-12-31 | 0.76 | 0.82 | 0.06 | 7 | ||
2008-10-23 | 2008-09-30 | 1.09 | 1.18 | 0.09 | 8 | ||
2008-07-25 | 2008-06-30 | 0.98 | 1.09 | 0.11 | 11 | ||
2008-04-24 | 2008-03-31 | 0.86 | 0.85 | -0.01 | 1 | ||
2008-01-24 | 2007-12-31 | 0.83 | 0.82 | -0.01 | 1 | ||
2007-10-25 | 2007-09-30 | 0.94 | 1.1 | 0.16 | 17 | ||
2007-07-27 | 2007-06-30 | 0.75 | 0.89 | 0.14 | 18 | ||
2007-04-26 | 2007-03-31 | 0.6 | 0.69 | 0.09 | 15 | ||
2007-01-25 | 2006-12-31 | 0.46 | 0.48 | 0.02 | 4 | ||
2006-10-19 | 2006-09-30 | 0.79 | 0.78 | -0.01 | 1 | ||
2006-07-20 | 2006-06-30 | 0.66 | 0.67 | 0.01 | 1 | ||
2006-04-20 | 2006-03-31 | 0.55 | 0.65 | 0.1 | 18 | ||
2006-01-19 | 2005-12-31 | 0.77 | 0.84 | 0.07 | 9 | ||
2005-10-18 | 2005-09-30 | 0.74 | 0.79 | 0.05 | 6 | ||
2005-07-19 | 2005-06-30 | 0.62 | 0.58 | -0.04 | 6 | ||
2005-04-19 | 2005-03-31 | 0.48 | 0.46 | -0.02 | 4 | ||
2005-01-20 | 2004-12-31 | 0.63 | 0.64 | 0.01 | 1 | ||
2004-10-19 | 2004-09-30 | 0.67 | 0.69 | 0.02 | 2 | ||
2004-07-20 | 2004-06-30 | 0.57 | 0.62 | 0.05 | 8 | ||
2004-04-20 | 2004-03-31 | 0.44 | 0.56 | 0.12 | 27 | ||
2004-01-20 | 2003-12-31 | 0.54 | 0.58 | 0.04 | 7 | ||
2003-10-21 | 2003-09-30 | 0.49 | 0.57 | 0.08 | 16 | ||
2003-07-23 | 2003-06-30 | 0.43 | 0.47 | 0.04 | 9 | ||
2003-04-22 | 2003-03-31 | 0.42 | 0.36 | -0.06 | 14 | ||
2003-01-21 | 2002-12-31 | 0.46 | 0.58 | 0.12 | 26 | ||
2002-10-17 | 2002-09-30 | 0.45 | 0.49 | 0.04 | 8 | ||
2002-07-24 | 2002-06-30 | 0.39 | 0.44 | 0.05 | 12 | ||
2002-04-23 | 2002-03-31 | 0.33 | 0.33 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2002-01-22 | 2001-12-31 | 0.33 | 0.3 | -0.03 | 9 | ||
2001-10-18 | 2001-09-30 | 0.38 | 0.33 | -0.05 | 13 | ||
2001-07-19 | 2001-06-30 | 0.41 | 0.37 | -0.04 | 9 | ||
2001-04-19 | 2001-03-31 | 0.43 | 0.36 | -0.07 | 16 | ||
2001-01-17 | 2000-12-31 | 0.46 | 0.48 | 0.02 | 4 | ||
2000-10-19 | 2000-09-30 | 0.62 | 0.55 | -0.07 | 11 | ||
2000-07-19 | 2000-06-30 | 0.59 | 0.54 | -0.05 | 8 | ||
2000-04-19 | 2000-03-31 | 0.51 | 0.55 | 0.04 | 7 | ||
2000-01-19 | 1999-12-31 | 0.42 | 0.42 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
1999-10-21 | 1999-09-30 | 0.43 | 0.44 | 0.01 | 2 | ||
1999-07-19 | 1999-06-30 | 0.66 | 0.65 | -0.01 | 1 | ||
1999-04-21 | 1999-03-31 | 0.6 | 0.61 | 0.01 | 1 | ||
1999-02-01 | 1998-12-31 | 0.64 | 0.63 | -0.01 | 1 | ||
1998-10-29 | 1998-09-30 | 0.65 | 0.65 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
1998-07-16 | 1998-06-30 | 0.66 | 0.65 | -0.01 | 1 | ||
1998-04-16 | 1998-03-31 | 0.58 | 0.58 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
1998-01-21 | 1997-12-31 | 0.61 | 0.63 | 0.02 | 3 | ||
1997-10-15 | 1997-09-30 | 0.62 | 0.6 | -0.02 | 3 | ||
1997-07-16 | 1997-06-30 | 0.59 | 0.6 | 0.01 | 1 | ||
1997-04-16 | 1997-03-31 | 0.53 | 0.53 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
1997-01-22 | 1996-12-31 | 0.55 | 0.55 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
1996-10-16 | 1996-09-30 | 0.54 | 0.55 | 0.01 | 1 | ||
1996-07-17 | 1996-06-30 | 0.51 | 0.53 | 0.02 | 3 | ||
1996-04-18 | 1996-03-31 | 0.47 | 0.47 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
1996-01-17 | 1995-12-31 | 0.48 | 0.48 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
1995-10-18 | 1995-09-30 | 0.46 | 0.48 | 0.02 | 4 |
Use Hubbell in pair-trading
Pair trading with Hubbell can help investors hedge some company-specific exposure by balancing a long view with an offsetting position. The key question is whether the second leg adds real hedge value instead of just creating a more complex version of the same risk.
Hubbell Pair Trading
Hubbell Pair Trading Analysis
Investors who sell Hubbell at a loss must wait 30 days before repurchasing to avoid wash-sale rules. The key is finding instruments that track Hubbell closely enough to maintain equivalent risk. The correlation table below shows which instruments historically move in lockstep with Hubbell.
A correlation of +1 between Hubbell and another asset means they move in perfect lockstep. A correlation near zero implies that Hubbell provides genuine diversification benefits. Negative correlation assets provide natural hedges against Hubbell positions in a diversified portfolio.
Hubbell's hedging context can be framed through Correlation analysis and pair-based evaluation. The figures are grounded in exchange-reported price and volume records.Use Investing Themes to Complement your Hubbell position
Hubbell Industrials sector classification and 26.88 Billion mid-cap scale make it a natural anchor for themes targeting Electrical Equipment & Parts exposure. Hubbell mid-cap scale (26.88 Billion) within Electrical Equipment & Parts helps compare substitutes, complements, and diversifiers that strengthen the overall Industrials allocation.
Did You Try This Idea?
Run Government Funds Thematic Idea Now
Government Funds
Funds or Etfs that invest in fixed income securities issued by national government to finance government spending or to facilitate Federal Reserve monetary policies. The Government Funds theme has 46 constituents at this time.
Explore the Government Funds Theme as a thematic allocation that can be optimized for return targets or risk constraints.
| View All Next | Launch |