Ford Revenue vs. Net Income
| F Stock | USD 13.69 0.13 0.94% |
Total Revenue | First Reported 1985-09-30 | Previous Quarter 50.2 B | Current Value 50.5 B | Quarterly Volatility 8.4 B |
| Current Value | Last Year | Change From Last Year | 10 Year Trend | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Profit Margin | 0.18 | 0.0964 |
|
|
For Ford profitability analysis, we use financial ratios and fundamental drivers that measure the ability of Ford to generate income relative to revenue, assets, operating costs, and current equity. These fundamental indicators attest to how well Ford Motor utilizes its assets to generate profit and value for its shareholders. The profitability module also shows relationships between Ford's most relevant fundamental drivers. It provides multiple suggestions of what could affect the performance of Ford Motor over time as well as its relative position and ranking within its peers.
Ford's Revenue Breakdown by Earning Segment
Check out Investing Opportunities.
Ford Revenue Breakdown by Earning Segment
By analyzing Ford's earnings estimates, investors can diagnose different trends across Ford's analyst sentiment over time as well as compare current estimates against different timeframes.
Can Automobile Manufacturers industry sustain growth momentum? Does Ford have expansion opportunities? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Ford. Market participants price Ford higher when confident in its future expansion prospects. Determining accurate worth demands scrutiny of both present operating results and projected expansion capacity. Evaluating Ford demands reviewing these metrics collectively while recognizing certain factors exert disproportionate influence.
Quarterly Earnings Growth 1.727 | Dividend Share 0.6 | Earnings Share 1.17 | Revenue Per Share | Quarterly Revenue Growth 0.094 |
Investors evaluate Ford Motor using market value (trading price) and book value (balance sheet equity), each telling a different story. Calculating Ford's intrinsic value - the estimated true worth - helps identify when the stock trades at a discount or premium to fair value. Market participants employ diverse analytical approaches to determine fair value and identify buying opportunities when prices dip below calculated worth. External factors like market trends, sector rotation, and investor psychology can cause Ford's market price to deviate significantly from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Ford's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Ford is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. Conversely, Ford's market price signifies the transaction level at which participants voluntarily complete trades.
Ford Motor Net Income vs. Revenue Fundamental Analysis
Comparative valuation techniques use various fundamental indicators to help in determining Ford's current stock value. Our valuation model uses many indicators to compare Ford value to that of its competitors to determine the firm's financial worth. Ford Motor is rated # 4 in revenue category among its peers. It also is rated # 4 in net income category among its peers making up about 0.03 of Net Income per Revenue. The ratio of Revenue to Net Income for Ford Motor is roughly 31.39 . At this time, Ford's Total Revenue is most likely to increase significantly in the upcoming years. Comparative valuation analysis is a catch-all technique that is used if you cannot value Ford by discounting back its dividends or cash flows. It compares the stock's price multiples to nearest competition to determine if the stock is relatively undervalued or overvalued.Ford Revenue vs. Competition
Ford Motor is rated # 4 in revenue category among its peers. Market size based on revenue of Consumer Discretionary industry is currently estimated at about 1.82 Trillion. Ford retains roughly 184.99 Billion in revenue claiming about 10% of stocks in Consumer Discretionary industry.
Ford Net Income vs. Revenue
Revenue is income that a firm generates from business activities such us rendering services or selling goods to customers. It is a crucial part of a business and an essential item when evaluating a company's financial statements. Revenues from a firm's primary business operations can be reported on the income statement as sales revenue, net sales, or simply sales, depending on the industry in which a given company operates.
Ford |
| = | 184.99 B |
Revenue is typically recorded when cash or cash equivalents are exchanged for services or goods and can include products or services discounts, promotions, as well as early payments on invoices or services rendered in advance.
Net income is the profit of a company for the reporting period, which is derived after taking revenues and gains and subtracting all expenses and losses. Net income is one of the most-watched numbers by money managers as well as individual investors.
Ford |
| = | 5.89 B |
Because income is reported on the Income Statement of a company and is measured in dollars some investors prefer to use Profit Margin, which measures income as a percentage of sales.
Ford Net Income Comparison
Ford is currently under evaluation in net income category among its peers.
Ford Profitability Projections
The most important aspect of a successful company is its ability to generate a profit. For investors in Ford, profitability is also one of the essential criteria for including it into their portfolios because, without profit, Ford will eventually generate negative long term returns. The profitability progress is the general direction of Ford's change in net profit over the period of time. It can combine multiple indicators of Ford, where stable trends show no significant progress. An accelerating trend is seen as positive, while a decreasing one is unfavorable. A rising trend means that profits are rising, and operational efficiency may be rising as well. A decreasing trend is a sign of poor performance and may indicate upcoming losses.
| Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
| Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income | -8.7 B | -9.1 B | |
| Operating Income | 4.7 B | 6 B | |
| Income Before Tax | 6.5 B | 3.4 B | |
| Total Other Income Expense Net | 2.3 B | 2.4 B | |
| Net Income | 6.8 B | 3.9 B | |
| Income Tax Expense | 1.2 B | 1.3 B | |
| Net Income Applicable To Common Shares | 6.8 B | 5.5 B | |
| Net Income From Continuing Ops | 5.3 B | 4.8 B | |
| Non Operating Income Net Other | -9.2 B | -8.8 B | |
| Interest Income | 1.8 B | 1.3 B | |
| Net Interest Income | 363.6 M | 381.8 M | |
| Change To Netincome | 8.9 B | 9.4 B | |
| Net Income Per Share | 1.70 | 1.74 | |
| Income Quality | 2.36 | 2.24 | |
| Net Income Per E B T | 0.93 | 0.89 |
Ford Profitability Driver Comparison
Profitability drivers are factors that can directly affect your investment outlook on Ford. Investors often realize that things won't turn out the way they predict. There are maybe way too many unforeseen events and contingencies during the holding period of Ford position where the market behavior may be hard to predict, tax policy changes, gold or oil price hikes, calamities change, and many others. The question is, are you prepared for these unexpected events? Although some of these situations are obviously beyond your control, you can still follow the important profit indicators to know where you should focus on when things like this occur. Below are some of the Ford's important profitability drivers and their relationship over time.
Ford Earnings Estimation Breakdown
The calculation of Ford's earning per share is based on the data from the past 12 consecutive months, used for reporting the company's financial figures. The next projected EPS of Ford is estimated to be 0.1155 with the future projection ranging from a low of 0.2475 to a high of 0.3125. Please be aware that this consensus of annual earnings estimates for Ford Motor is based on EPS before non-recurring items and includes expenses related to employee stock options.Last Reported EPS
0.25 Lowest | Expected EPS | 0.31 Highest |
Ford Earnings Projection Consensus
Suppose the current estimates of Ford's value are higher than the current market price of the Ford stock. In this case, investors may conclude that Ford is overpriced and will exhibit bullish sentiment. On the other hand, if the present value is lower than the stock price, analysts may conclude that the market undervalues the equity. These scenarios may suggest that the market is not as efficient as it should be at the estimation time, and Ford's stock will quickly adjusts to the new information provided by the consensus estimate.
| Number of Analysts | Historical Accuracy | Last Reported EPS | Estimated EPS for 31st of December 2025 | Current EPS (TTM) | |
| 21 | 72.4% | 0.45 | 0.1155 | 1.17 |
Ford Earnings per Share Projection vs Actual
Actual Earning per Share of Ford refers to what the company shows during its earnings calls or quarterly reports. The Expected EPS is what analysts covering Ford Motor predict the company's earnings will be in the future. The higher the earnings per share of Ford, the better is its profitability. While calculating the Earning per Share, we use the weighted ratio, as the number of shares outstanding can change over time.Ford Estimated Months Earnings per Share
For an investor who is primarily interested in generating an income out of investing in entities such as Ford, the EPS ratio can tell if the company is intending to increase its current dividend. Although EPS is an essential tool for investors, it should not be used in isolation. EPS of Ford should always be considered in relation to other companies to make a more educated investment decision.Ford Quarterly Analyst Estimates and Surprise Metrics
Earnings surprises can significantly impact Ford's stock price both in the short term and over time. Negative earnings surprises usually result in a price decline. However, it has been seen that positive earnings surprises lead to an immediate rise in a stock's price and a gradual increase over time. This is why we often hear news about some companies beating earning projections. Financial analysts spend a large amount of time predicting earnings per share (EPS) along with other important future indicators. Many analysts use forecasting models, management guidance, and additional fundamental information to derive an EPS estimate.
| Reported | Fiscal Date | Estimated EPS | Reported EPS | Surprise | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2025-10-23 | 2025-09-30 | 0.35 | 0.45 | 0.1 | 28 | ||
2025-07-30 | 2025-06-30 | 0.32 | 0.37 | 0.05 | 15 | ||
2025-05-05 | 2025-03-31 | 0.03 | 0.14 | 0.11 | 366 | ||
2025-02-05 | 2024-12-31 | 0.32 | 0.39 | 0.07 | 21 | ||
2024-10-28 | 2024-09-30 | 0.47 | 0.49 | 0.02 | 4 | ||
2024-07-24 | 2024-06-30 | 0.68 | 0.47 | -0.21 | 30 | ||
2024-04-24 | 2024-03-31 | 0.42 | 0.49 | 0.07 | 16 | ||
2024-02-06 | 2023-12-31 | 0.14 | 0.29 | 0.15 | 107 | ||
2023-10-26 | 2023-09-30 | 0.45 | 0.39 | -0.06 | 13 | ||
2023-07-27 | 2023-06-30 | 0.55 | 0.72 | 0.17 | 30 | ||
2023-05-02 | 2023-03-31 | 0.41 | 0.63 | 0.22 | 53 | ||
2023-02-02 | 2022-12-31 | 0.62 | 0.51 | -0.11 | 17 | ||
2022-10-26 | 2022-09-30 | 0.27 | 0.3 | 0.03 | 11 | ||
2022-07-27 | 2022-06-30 | 0.45 | 0.68 | 0.23 | 51 | ||
2022-04-27 | 2022-03-31 | 0.37 | 0.38 | 0.01 | 2 | ||
2022-02-03 | 2021-12-31 | 0.45 | 0.26 | -0.19 | 42 | ||
2021-10-27 | 2021-09-30 | 0.27 | 0.51 | 0.24 | 88 | ||
2021-07-28 | 2021-06-30 | -0.03 | 0.13 | 0.16 | 533 | ||
2021-04-28 | 2021-03-31 | 0.21 | 0.89 | 0.68 | 323 | ||
2021-02-04 | 2020-12-31 | -0.07 | 0.34 | 0.41 | 585 | ||
2020-10-28 | 2020-09-30 | 0.19 | 0.65 | 0.46 | 242 | ||
2020-07-30 | 2020-06-30 | -1.17 | -0.35 | 0.82 | 70 | ||
2020-04-28 | 2020-03-31 | -0.12 | -0.23 | -0.11 | 91 | ||
2020-02-04 | 2019-12-31 | 0.15 | 0.12 | -0.03 | 20 | ||
2019-10-23 | 2019-09-30 | 0.26 | 0.34 | 0.08 | 30 | ||
2019-07-24 | 2019-06-30 | 0.31 | 0.28 | -0.03 | 9 | ||
2019-04-25 | 2019-03-31 | 0.27 | 0.44 | 0.17 | 62 | ||
2019-01-23 | 2018-12-31 | 0.32 | 0.3 | -0.02 | 6 | ||
2018-10-24 | 2018-09-30 | 0.28 | 0.29 | 0.01 | 3 | ||
2018-07-25 | 2018-06-30 | 0.31 | 0.27 | -0.04 | 12 | ||
2018-04-25 | 2018-03-31 | 0.41 | 0.43 | 0.02 | 4 | ||
2018-01-24 | 2017-12-31 | 0.42 | 0.39 | -0.03 | 7 | ||
2017-10-26 | 2017-09-30 | 0.32 | 0.43 | 0.11 | 34 | ||
2017-07-26 | 2017-06-30 | 0.43 | 0.56 | 0.13 | 30 | ||
2017-04-27 | 2017-03-31 | 0.35 | 0.39 | 0.04 | 11 | ||
2017-01-26 | 2016-12-31 | 0.31 | 0.3 | -0.01 | 3 | ||
2016-10-27 | 2016-09-30 | 0.2 | 0.26 | 0.06 | 30 | ||
2016-07-28 | 2016-06-30 | 0.6 | 0.52 | -0.08 | 13 | ||
2016-04-28 | 2016-03-31 | 0.48 | 0.68 | 0.2 | 41 | ||
2016-01-28 | 2015-12-31 | 0.51 | 0.58 | 0.07 | 13 | ||
2015-10-27 | 2015-09-30 | 0.46 | 0.45 | -0.01 | 2 | ||
2015-07-28 | 2015-06-30 | 0.37 | 0.47 | 0.1 | 27 | ||
2015-04-28 | 2015-03-31 | 0.26 | 0.23 | -0.03 | 11 | ||
2015-01-29 | 2014-12-31 | 0.23 | 0.26 | 0.03 | 13 | ||
2014-10-24 | 2014-09-30 | 0.19 | 0.24 | 0.05 | 26 | ||
2014-07-24 | 2014-06-30 | 0.36 | 0.4 | 0.04 | 11 | ||
2014-04-25 | 2014-03-31 | 0.31 | 0.25 | -0.06 | 19 | ||
2014-01-28 | 2013-12-31 | 0.28 | 0.31 | 0.03 | 10 | ||
2013-10-24 | 2013-09-30 | 0.38 | 0.45 | 0.07 | 18 | ||
2013-07-24 | 2013-06-30 | 0.37 | 0.45 | 0.08 | 21 | ||
2013-04-24 | 2013-03-31 | 0.37 | 0.41 | 0.04 | 10 | ||
2013-01-29 | 2012-12-31 | 0.25 | 0.31 | 0.06 | 24 | ||
2012-10-30 | 2012-09-30 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 33 | ||
2012-07-25 | 2012-06-30 | 0.28 | 0.3 | 0.02 | 7 | ||
2012-04-27 | 2012-03-31 | 0.35 | 0.39 | 0.04 | 11 | ||
2012-01-27 | 2011-12-31 | 0.25 | 0.2 | -0.05 | 20 | ||
2011-10-26 | 2011-09-30 | 0.44 | 0.46 | 0.02 | 4 | ||
2011-07-26 | 2011-06-30 | 0.6 | 0.65 | 0.05 | 8 | ||
2011-04-26 | 2011-03-31 | 0.5 | 0.62 | 0.12 | 24 | ||
2011-01-28 | 2010-12-31 | 0.48 | 0.3 | -0.18 | 37 | ||
2010-10-26 | 2010-09-30 | 0.38 | 0.48 | 0.1 | 26 | ||
2010-07-23 | 2010-06-30 | 0.4 | 0.68 | 0.28 | 70 | ||
2010-04-27 | 2010-03-31 | 0.31 | 0.46 | 0.15 | 48 | ||
2010-01-28 | 2009-12-31 | 0.26 | 0.43 | 0.17 | 65 | ||
2009-11-02 | 2009-09-30 | -0.12 | 0.26 | 0.38 | 316 | ||
2009-07-23 | 2009-06-30 | -0.48 | -0.21 | 0.27 | 56 | ||
2009-04-24 | 2009-03-31 | -1.23 | -0.75 | 0.48 | 39 | ||
2009-01-29 | 2008-12-31 | -1.3 | -1.37 | -0.07 | 5 | ||
2008-11-07 | 2008-09-30 | -0.94 | -1.31 | -0.37 | 39 | ||
2008-07-24 | 2008-06-30 | -0.27 | -0.62 | -0.35 | 129 | ||
2008-04-24 | 2008-03-31 | -0.16 | 0.2 | 0.36 | 225 | ||
2008-01-24 | 2007-12-31 | -0.19 | -0.2 | -0.01 | 5 | ||
2007-11-08 | 2007-09-30 | -0.46 | -0.01 | 0.45 | 97 | ||
2007-07-26 | 2007-06-30 | -0.35 | 0.13 | 0.48 | 137 | ||
2007-04-26 | 2007-03-31 | -0.6 | -0.09 | 0.51 | 85 | ||
2007-01-25 | 2006-12-31 | -1.01 | -1.1 | -0.09 | 8 | ||
2006-10-23 | 2006-09-30 | -0.61 | -0.62 | -0.01 | 1 | ||
2006-07-20 | 2006-06-30 | 0.12 | -0.03 | -0.15 | 125 | ||
2006-04-21 | 2006-03-31 | 0.25 | 0.24 | -0.01 | 4 | ||
2006-01-23 | 2005-12-31 | 0.01 | 0.26 | 0.25 | 2500 | ||
2005-10-20 | 2005-09-30 | -0.1 | -0.1 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2005-07-19 | 2005-06-30 | 0.33 | 0.47 | 0.14 | 42 | ||
2005-04-20 | 2005-03-31 | 0.39 | 0.62 | 0.23 | 58 | ||
2005-01-20 | 2004-12-31 | 0.27 | 0.28 | 0.01 | 3 | ||
2004-10-19 | 2004-09-30 | 0.14 | 0.28 | 0.14 | 100 | ||
2004-07-20 | 2004-06-30 | 0.5 | 0.61 | 0.11 | 22 | ||
2004-04-21 | 2004-03-31 | 0.44 | 0.96 | 0.52 | 118 | ||
2004-01-22 | 2003-12-31 | 0.28 | 0.31 | 0.03 | 10 | ||
2003-10-16 | 2003-09-30 | -0.11 | 0.15 | 0.26 | 236 | ||
2003-07-16 | 2003-06-30 | 0.18 | 0.22 | 0.04 | 22 | ||
2003-04-16 | 2003-03-31 | 0.22 | 0.45 | 0.23 | 104 | ||
2003-01-21 | 2002-12-31 | 0.06 | 0.08 | 0.02 | 33 | ||
2002-10-16 | 2002-09-30 | 0.04 | 0.12 | 0.08 | 200 | ||
2002-07-17 | 2002-06-30 | 0.26 | 0.31 | 0.05 | 19 | ||
2002-04-17 | 2002-03-31 | -0.15 | -0.06 | 0.09 | 60 | ||
2002-01-17 | 2001-12-31 | -0.5 | -0.48 | 0.02 | 4 | ||
2001-10-17 | 2001-09-30 | -0.27 | -0.28 | -0.01 | 3 | ||
2001-07-18 | 2001-06-30 | -0.34 | -0.3 | 0.04 | 11 | ||
2001-04-19 | 2001-03-31 | 0.53 | 0.6 | 0.07 | 13 | ||
2001-01-18 | 2000-12-31 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2000-10-18 | 2000-09-30 | 0.49 | 0.5 | 0.01 | 2 | ||
2000-07-19 | 2000-06-30 | 2 | 2.07 | 0.07 | 3 | ||
2000-04-17 | 2000-03-31 | 1.57 | 1.7 | 0.13 | 8 | ||
2000-01-26 | 1999-12-31 | 1.45 | 1.47 | 0.02 | 1 | ||
1999-10-18 | 1999-09-30 | 0.84 | 0.9 | 0.06 | 7 | ||
1999-07-14 | 1999-06-30 | 1.95 | 2.0 | 0.05 | 2 | ||
1999-04-15 | 1999-03-31 | 1.41 | 1.46 | 0.05 | 3 | ||
1999-01-21 | 1998-12-31 | 1.26 | 1.35 | 0.09 | 7 | ||
1998-10-14 | 1998-09-30 | 0.79 | 0.8 | 0.01 | 1 | ||
1998-07-15 | 1998-06-30 | 1.8 | 1.91 | 0.11 | 6 | ||
1998-04-16 | 1998-03-31 | 1.34 | 1.22 | -0.12 | 8 | ||
1998-01-27 | 1997-12-31 | 1.21 | 1.45 | 0.24 | 19 | ||
1997-10-15 | 1997-09-30 | 0.84 | 0.9 | 0.06 | 7 | ||
1997-07-16 | 1997-06-30 | 1.83 | 1.98 | 0.15 | 8 | ||
1997-04-16 | 1997-03-31 | 0.86 | 1.2 | 0.34 | 39 | ||
1997-01-29 | 1996-12-31 | 0.98 | 1.1 | 0.12 | 12 | ||
1996-10-16 | 1996-09-30 | 0.52 | 0.53 | 0.01 | 1 | ||
1996-07-17 | 1996-06-30 | 1.21 | 1.38 | 0.17 | 14 | ||
1996-04-17 | 1996-03-31 | 0.34 | 0.53 | 0.19 | 55 |
Use Ford in pair-trading
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Ford position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Ford will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.Ford Pair Trading
Ford Motor Pair Trading Analysis
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Ford could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Ford when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Ford - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Ford Motor to buy it.
The correlation of Ford is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Ford moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Ford Motor moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Ford can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Use Investing Themes to Complement your Ford position
In addition to having Ford in your portfolios, you can quickly add positions using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your very unique investing style. A single investing idea is a collection of funds, stocks, ETFs, or cryptocurrencies that are programmatically selected from a pull of investment themes. After you determine your investment opportunity, you can then find an optimal portfolio that will maximize potential returns on the chosen idea or minimize its exposure to market volatility.Did You Try This Idea?
Run Banks Thematic Idea Now
Banks
Large and small money and credit banks and credit services. The Banks theme has 39 constituents at this time.
You can either use a buy-and-hold strategy to lock in the entire theme or actively trade it to take advantage of the short-term price volatility of individual constituents. Macroaxis can help you discover thousands of investment opportunities in different asset classes. In addition, you can partner with us for reliable portfolio optimization as you plan to utilize Banks Theme or any other thematic opportunities.
| View All Next | Launch |
Check out Investing Opportunities. You can also try the Content Syndication module to quickly integrate customizable finance content to your own investment portal.
To fully project Ford's future profitability, investors should examine all historical financial statements. These statements provide investors with a comprehensive snapshot of the financial position of Ford Motor at a specified time, usually calculated after every quarter, six months, or one year. Three primary documents fall into the category of financial statements. These documents include Ford's income statement, its balance sheet, and the statement of cash flows.