Dominos Pizza Number Of Shares Shorted vs. Current Valuation
| DPZ Stock | USD 376.92 -19.26 -4.86% |
| Current Value | Last Year | Change From Last Year | 10 Year Trend | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Profit Margin | 0.25 | 0.3856 |
|
| |||||
| Net Profit Margin | 0.0606 | 0.1159 |
|
| |||||
| Operating Profit Margin | 0.13 | 0.183 |
|
| |||||
| Pretax Profit Margin | 0.088 | 0.1457 |
|
| |||||
| Return On Assets | 0.18 | 0.3099 |
|
|
Profitability context for Dominos Pizza is derived from margins and returns tied to revenue, assets, and operating expenses.
Dominos Pizza's Revenue by Operating Segment
Investing Opportunities.
Macro event markers
Dominos Pizza Revenue Breakdown by Earning Segment View
Earnings estimates provide context for forward-looking performance discussion. The estimates are presented as context for broader analysis and timeframe comparison.
Quarterly Earnings Growth 0.301 | Dividend Share 6.96 | Earnings Share 17.57 | Revenue Per Share | Quarterly Revenue Growth 0.031 |
Investors evaluate Dominos Pizza Common using market value and book value, each describing different facets of the business. Dominos Pizza's market capitalization is 13.19 B. Enterprise value stands at 18.43 B. Value and price for Dominos Pizza are related but not identical, and they can diverge across cycles. Trading price represents the transaction level agreed by market participants.
It is useful to distinguish Dominos Pizza's value from its trading price, which are computed with different methods. For Dominos Pizza, key inputs include a P/E ratio of 31.79, a profit margin of 12.18%, and revenue of 4.94 B. Dominos Pizza's market quotation reflects the latest level where a willing buyer met a willing seller.
Dominos Pizza Common Current Valuation vs. Number Of Shares Shorted Fundamental Analysis
Cross-company financial ratios help determine Dominos Pizza's valuation standing. Dominos Pizza Common is rated below average in number of shares shorted among leading competitors. It is rated third in current valuation among leading competitors reporting about 9,340 of Current Valuation per Number Of Shares Shorted. Multiples-driven valuation aligns Dominos Pizza with peer performance.Dominos Current Valuation vs. Number Of Shares Shorted
Number of Shares Shorted is the total amount of shares that are currently sold short by investors. When a stock is sold short, the short seller assumes the responsibility of repurchasing the stock at a lower price. The speculator will make money if the stock goes down in price or will experience a loss if the stock price goes up.
Dominos Pizza |
| = | 1.97 M |
If a large number of investors decide to short sell an equity instrument within a small period of time, their combined action can significantly affect the price of the stock.
Enterprise Value is a firm valuation proxy that approximates the current market value of a company. It is typically used to determine the takeover or merger price of a firm. Unlike Market Cap, this measure takes into account all liquid assets, outstanding debt, and exotic equity instruments that the company has on its balance sheet. When a takeover occurs, the parent company will have to assume the target company's liabilities but will take possession of all cash and cash equivalents.
Dominos Pizza |
| = | 18.43 B |
Enterprise Value can be a useful tool to compare companies with different capital structures. Long term liability and current cash or cash equivalents can have a huge impact on market valuation of a given company.
Dominos Current Valuation vs Competition
Dominos Pizza Common is rated third in current valuation among leading competitors. After adjusting for long-term liabilities, total market size of Consumer Discretionary industry is currently estimated at about 190.23 Billion. Dominos Pizza holds roughly 18.43 Billion in current valuation claiming about 10% of market share in Consumer Discretionary space.
Dominos Pizza Profitability Projections
The most important aspect of a successful company is its ability to generate a profit. For investors in Dominos Pizza, profitability is also one of the essential criteria for including it into their portfolios because, without profit, Dominos Pizza will eventually generate negative long term returns. The profitability progress is the general direction of Dominos Pizza's change in net profit over the period of time. It can combine multiple indicators of Dominos Pizza, where stable trends show no significant progress. An accelerating trend is seen as positive, while a decreasing one is unfavorable. A rising trend means that profits are rising, and operational efficiency may be rising as well. A decreasing trend is a sign of poor performance and may indicate upcoming losses.
| Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
| Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income | -4.8 M | -4.5 M | |
| Operating Income | 954 M | 1 B | |
| Income Before Tax | 770.3 M | 808.9 M | |
| Total Other Income Expense Net | -183.6 M | -174.5 M | |
| Net Income | 601.7 M | 631.8 M | |
| Income Tax Expense | 168.6 M | 177.1 M | |
| Net Income Applicable To Common Shares | 520.1 M | 546.1 M | |
| Net Income From Continuing Ops | 601.7 M | 376.3 M | |
| Non Operating Income Net Other | 3.6 M | 3.8 M | |
| Interest Income | 14.9 M | 11.3 M | |
| Net Interest Income | -181.1 M | -190.1 M | |
| Change To Netincome | 11.8 M | 12.4 M | |
| Net Income Per Share | 14.80 | 15.54 | |
| Income Quality | 1.14 | 1.55 | |
| Net Income Per E B T | 0.80 | 0.55 |
Dominos Profitability Driver Comparison
The profitability drivers of Dominos Pizza are among the most important inputs for investors evaluating its long-term potential. A wide range of unpredictable external events can affect earnings and create sudden volatility in Dominos Pizza's market value and investment attractiveness.
Earnings Estimation Breakdown
Analyst consensus for Dominos Pizza Common places the projected EPS at 4.3157 for the upcoming period. This estimate is bounded by a low of 4.2 and a high of 4.4952 across all analyst models covering Dominos Pizza. Trailing twelve-month reporting data forms the basis of this projection, with non-recurring items excluded from the calculation.Last Reported EPS
4.20 Lowest | Expected EPS | 4.50 Highest |
Earnings Projection Consensus
Valuation signals derived from Dominos Pizza's consensus EPS estimate versus market price offer a directional view of relative attractiveness. A positive gap may indicate room for repricing toward the estimate; a negative gap may suggest the market has already priced in growth fully. These scenarios should be reviewed within the context of earnings quality, sector dynamics, and macroeconomic conditions.
| Number of Analysts | Historical Accuracy | Last Reported EPS | Estimated EPS for 31st of March 2026 | Current EPS (TTM) | |
| 34 | 94.56% | 5.35 | 4.3157 | 17.57 |
Earnings per Share Projection vs Actual
Actual EPS for Dominos Pizza is reported directly from its income statement at each quarterly disclosure event. Analyst-projected EPS for Dominos Pizza Common represents the consensus expectation for what Dominos Pizza will earn in future quarters. A rising EPS trend generally signals improving profitability; the weighted average adjusts for changes in share count through the period.Estimated Months Earnings per Share
EPS is a cornerstone metric for income-focused investors in Dominos Pizza, offering a direct read on per-share profitability and dividend coverage capacity. A growing EPS trajectory suggests the company is better positioned to sustain and increase distributions over time. Investors should always evaluate Dominos Pizza's EPS relative to peers and in combination with cash flow and balance sheet data.Quarterly Analyst Estimates and Surprise Metrics
Analysts spend considerable effort projecting Dominos Pizza's quarterly EPS using management guidance, industry data, and financial models. When results deviate materially from these projections, markets reprice quickly and decisively. Understanding the surprise history gives investors a data-driven framework for setting expectations around upcoming reporting events.
| Reported | Fiscal Date | Estimated EPS | Reported EPS | Surprise | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2026-02-23 | 2025-12-31 | 5.3866 | 5.35 | -0.0366 | 0 | ||
2025-10-14 | 2025-09-30 | 3.95 | 4.08 | 0.13 | 3 | ||
2025-07-21 | 2025-06-30 | 3.94 | 3.81 | -0.13 | 3 | ||
2025-04-28 | 2025-03-31 | 4.0737 | 4.33 | 0.2563 | 6 | ||
2025-02-24 | 2024-12-31 | 4.8951 | 4.89 | -0.0051 | 0 | ||
2024-10-10 | 2024-09-30 | 3.65 | 4.19 | 0.54 | 14 | ||
2024-07-18 | 2024-06-30 | 3.68 | 4.03 | 0.35 | 9 | ||
2024-04-29 | 2024-03-31 | 3.39 | 3.58 | 0.19 | 5 | ||
2024-02-26 | 2023-12-31 | 4.38 | 4.48 | 0.1 | 2 | ||
2023-10-12 | 2023-09-30 | 3.3 | 4.18 | 0.88 | 26 | ||
2023-07-24 | 2023-06-30 | 3.05 | 3.08 | 0.03 | 0 | ||
2023-04-27 | 2023-03-31 | 2.73 | 2.93 | 0.2 | 7 | ||
2023-02-23 | 2022-12-31 | 3.94 | 3.97 | 0.03 | 0 | ||
2022-10-13 | 2022-09-30 | 2.97 | 2.79 | -0.18 | 6 | ||
2022-07-21 | 2022-06-30 | 2.91 | 2.82 | -0.09 | 3 | ||
2022-04-28 | 2022-03-31 | 3.06 | 2.5 | -0.56 | 18 | ||
2022-03-01 | 2021-12-31 | 4.28 | 4.25 | -0.03 | 0 | ||
2021-10-14 | 2021-09-30 | 3.11 | 3.24 | 0.13 | 4 | ||
2021-07-22 | 2021-06-30 | 2.87 | 3.12 | 0.25 | 8 | ||
2021-04-29 | 2021-03-31 | 2.94 | 3.0 | 0.06 | 2 | ||
2021-02-25 | 2020-12-31 | 3.89 | 3.85 | -0.04 | 1 | ||
2020-10-08 | 2020-09-30 | 2.79 | 2.49 | -0.3 | 10 | ||
2020-07-16 | 2020-06-30 | 2.24 | 2.99 | 0.75 | 33 | ||
2020-04-23 | 2020-03-31 | 2.32 | 3.07 | 0.75 | 32 | ||
2020-02-20 | 2019-12-31 | 2.98 | 3.13 | 0.15 | 5 | ||
2019-10-08 | 2019-09-30 | 2.07 | 2.05 | -0.02 | 0 | ||
2019-07-16 | 2019-06-30 | 2.02 | 2.19 | 0.17 | 8 | ||
2019-04-24 | 2019-03-31 | 2.09 | 2.2 | 0.11 | 5 | ||
2019-02-21 | 2018-12-31 | 2.69 | 2.62 | -0.07 | 2 | ||
2018-10-16 | 2018-09-30 | 1.75 | 1.95 | 0.2 | 11 | ||
2018-07-19 | 2018-06-30 | 1.75 | 1.84 | 0.09 | 5 | ||
2018-04-26 | 2018-03-31 | 1.77 | 2.0 | 0.23 | 12 | ||
2018-02-20 | 2017-12-31 | 1.96 | 2.09 | 0.13 | 6 | ||
2017-10-12 | 2017-09-30 | 1.22 | 1.27 | 0.05 | 4 | ||
2017-07-25 | 2017-06-30 | 1.23 | 1.32 | 0.09 | 7 | ||
2017-04-27 | 2017-03-31 | 1.16 | 1.26 | 0.1 | 8 | ||
2017-02-28 | 2016-12-31 | 1.44 | 1.48 | 0.04 | 2 | ||
2016-10-18 | 2016-09-30 | 0.9 | 0.96 | 0.06 | 6 | ||
2016-07-21 | 2016-06-30 | 0.94 | 0.98 | 0.04 | 4 | ||
2016-04-28 | 2016-03-31 | 0.98 | 0.89 | -0.09 | 9 | ||
2016-02-25 | 2015-12-31 | 1.1 | 1.15 | 0.05 | 4 | ||
2015-10-08 | 2015-09-30 | 0.74 | 0.67 | -0.07 | 9 | ||
2015-07-16 | 2015-06-30 | 0.79 | 0.81 | 0.02 | 2 | ||
2015-04-23 | 2015-03-31 | 0.8 | 0.81 | 0.01 | 1 | ||
2015-02-24 | 2014-12-31 | 0.93 | 0.91 | -0.02 | 2 | ||
2014-10-14 | 2014-09-30 | 0.61 | 0.63 | 0.02 | 3 | ||
2014-07-22 | 2014-06-30 | 0.66 | 0.67 | 0.01 | 1 | ||
2014-05-01 | 2014-03-31 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2014-02-25 | 2013-12-31 | 0.76 | 0.78 | 0.02 | 2 | ||
2013-10-15 | 2013-09-30 | 0.52 | 0.51 | -0.01 | 1 | ||
2013-07-23 | 2013-06-30 | 0.56 | 0.57 | 0.01 | 1 | ||
2013-04-30 | 2013-03-31 | 0.55 | 0.59 | 0.04 | 7 | ||
2013-02-28 | 2012-12-31 | 0.6 | 0.64 | 0.04 | 6 | ||
2012-10-16 | 2012-09-30 | 0.41 | 0.43 | 0.02 | 4 | ||
2012-07-24 | 2012-06-30 | 0.46 | 0.47 | 0.01 | 2 | ||
2012-05-01 | 2012-03-31 | 0.49 | 0.47 | -0.02 | 4 | ||
2012-02-28 | 2011-12-31 | 0.49 | 0.52 | 0.03 | 6 | ||
2011-10-18 | 2011-09-30 | 0.33 | 0.35 | 0.02 | 6 | ||
2011-07-26 | 2011-06-30 | 0.36 | 0.4 | 0.04 | 11 | ||
2011-05-05 | 2011-03-31 | 0.34 | 0.42 | 0.08 | 23 | ||
2011-03-01 | 2010-12-31 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2010-10-19 | 2010-09-30 | 0.25 | 0.27 | 0.02 | 8 | ||
2010-07-27 | 2010-06-30 | 0.28 | 0.33 | 0.05 | 17 | ||
2010-05-04 | 2010-03-31 | 0.33 | 0.35 | 0.02 | 6 | ||
2010-03-02 | 2009-12-31 | 0.25 | 0.3 | 0.05 | 20 | ||
2009-10-13 | 2009-09-30 | 0.15 | 0.17 | 0.02 | 13 | ||
2009-07-22 | 2009-06-30 | 0.2 | 0.21 | 0.01 | 5 | ||
2009-04-30 | 2009-03-31 | 0.17 | 0.2 | 0.03 | 17 | ||
2009-02-24 | 2008-12-31 | 0.17 | 0.19 | 0.02 | 11 | ||
2008-10-14 | 2008-09-30 | 0.21 | 0.13 | -0.08 | 38 | ||
2008-07-22 | 2008-06-30 | 0.23 | 0.22 | -0.01 | 4 | ||
2008-04-29 | 2008-03-31 | 0.24 | 0.21 | -0.03 | 12 | ||
2008-02-26 | 2007-12-31 | 0.26 | 0.21 | -0.05 | 19 | ||
2007-10-16 | 2007-09-30 | 0.23 | 0.17 | -0.06 | 26 | ||
2007-07-24 | 2007-06-30 | 0.24 | 0.28 | 0.04 | 16 | ||
2007-05-02 | 2007-03-31 | 0.43 | 0.38 | -0.05 | 11 | ||
2007-02-23 | 2006-12-31 | 0.48 | 0.49 | 0.01 | 2 | ||
2006-10-12 | 2006-09-30 | 0.35 | 0.35 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2006-07-20 | 2006-06-30 | 0.37 | 0.39 | 0.02 | 5 | ||
2006-04-27 | 2006-03-31 | 0.37 | 0.39 | 0.02 | 5 | ||
2006-02-21 | 2005-12-31 | 0.42 | 0.45 | 0.03 | 7 | ||
2005-10-25 | 2005-09-30 | 0.27 | 0.3 | 0.03 | 11 | ||
2005-08-03 | 2005-06-30 | 0.32 | 0.35 | 0.03 | 9 | ||
2005-05-10 | 2005-03-31 | 0.3 | 0.35 | 0.05 | 16 | ||
2005-02-22 | 2004-12-31 | 0.39 | 0.38 | -0.01 | 2 | ||
2004-10-19 | 2004-09-30 | 0.22 | 0.23 | 0.01 | 4 |
Use Dominos Pizza in pair-trading
A pair strategy built around Dominos Pizza Common is useful when investors want to reduce directional market exposure while still expressing a relative-value idea. A disciplined pair strategy still requires monitoring because correlation can weaken when market regimes change.
Dominos Pizza Pair Trading
Dominos Pizza Common Pair Trading Analysis
Understanding the correlation structure around Dominos Pizza Common helps portfolio managers make better tax-loss harvesting decisions. A highly correlated substitute for Dominos Pizza ensures that the portfolio's expected return and risk profile remain largely intact through the wash-sale.
Investors use the correlation of Dominos Pizza to identify pairs-trading opportunities. When two historically correlated assets diverge temporarily, a long/short position combining Dominos Pizza Common with the diverging counterpart can generate returns with minimal net market exposure.
Use Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Dominos Pizza to review hedging context. The context can be applied within sectors, industries, or broader universes.Use Investing Themes to Complement your Dominos Pizza position
At 13.19 Billion in the Restaurants space, Dominos Pizza Common mid-cap profile gives investors a structured starting point for building sector-aligned themes. Building a Consumer Cyclical theme from Dominos Pizza Common 13.19 Billion position turns a single Restaurants conviction into a risk-managed basket.
Did You Try This Idea?
Run Macroaxis Index Thematic Idea Now
Macroaxis Index
An experimental equal-weighted index theme of selected equities generated based on Macroaxis rating and scoring system. The Macroaxis Index theme has 52 constituents at this time.
Explore the Macroaxis Index Theme as a thematic allocation that can be optimized for return targets or risk constraints.
| View All Next | Launch |