Chesapeake Utilities Net Income vs. Price To Earning
| CPK Stock | USD 125.98 -0.63 -0.50% |
Net Income | First Reported 1985-09-30 | Previous Quarter 19.4 M | Current Value 31.7 M | Quarterly Volatility 10 M |
Macro event markers
| Current Value | Last Year | Change From Last Year | 10 Year Trend | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Profit Margin | 0.35 | 0.3162 |
|
| |||||
| Net Profit Margin | 0.16 | 0.1509 |
|
| |||||
| Operating Profit Margin | 0.29 | 0.277 |
|
| |||||
| Pretax Profit Margin | 0.22 | 0.2075 |
|
| |||||
| Return On Assets | 0.0415 | 0.0347 |
|
| |||||
| Return On Equity | 0.12 | 0.0878 |
|
|
This view for Chesapeake Utilities frames profitability through return on assets, equity, and margin metrics. Metrics reflect relationships across revenue, asset base, and capital structure.
Chesapeake | Build portfolio with Chesapeake Stock |
Revenue Segmentation Overview
Chesapeake Utilities' top line is composed of 2 product-level revenue streams. Regulated Energy leads at 190 Million, representing roughly 71.3% of the total, followed by Unregulated Energy at 76.6 Million (28.7%). With the top segment exceeding 60% of revenue, Chesapeake Utilities' earnings are heavily concentrated in a single product line.
Trending Equities.
Macro event markers
Earnings Segment Revenue Breakdown for Chesapeake Utilities Snapshot
The breakdown below shows how Chesapeake Utilities' revenue is split across product segments for the most recent reporting period. Unregulated Energy rounds out the mix at 28.7%, representing Chesapeake Utilities' smallest reported product line.
These estimates offer context for valuation and trend interpretation. The dataset draws on income statement, balance sheet, and cash flow disclosures.
Quarterly Earnings Growth 0.211 | Dividend Share 2.695 | Earnings Share 5.98 | Revenue Per Share | Quarterly Revenue Growth 0.204 |
Chesapeake Utilities's market price can diverge from book value, the accounting figure shown on Chesapeake's balance sheet. The three perspectives together offer a richer context than any single measure alone.
Distinguishing between Chesapeake Utilities' value and market price helps frame analytical expectations. All figures are based on reported data and are informational in nature.
Chesapeake Utilities Price To Earning vs. Net Income Fundamental Analysis
Comparative financial modeling measures Chesapeake Utilities's valuation against peer benchmarks. Chesapeake Utilities is rated below average for net income within its peer group. It carries a third ranking for price to earning within its peer group . Chesapeake Utilities's Net Income registers at 4,998,219 relative to Price To Earning. According to the latest estimates, Net Income is gaining momentum with a magnitude of about 4.76%. A year ago, Chesapeake Utilities reported Net Income at 140.3 Million. Multiples-driven valuation aligns Chesapeake Utilities with peer performance.Chesapeake Price To Earning vs. Net Income
Net income is the profit of a company for the reporting period, which is derived after taking revenues and gains and subtracting all expenses and losses. Net income is one of the most-watched numbers by money managers as well as individual investors.
Chesapeake Utilities |
| = | 140.3 M |
Because income is reported on the Income Statement of a company and is measured in dollars some investors prefer to use Profit Margin, which measures income as a percentage of sales.
Price to Earnings ratio is typically used for current valuation of a company and is one of the most popular ratios that investors monitor daily. Holding a low PE stock is less risky because when a company's profitability falls, it is likely that earnings will also go down. In other words, if you start from a lower position, your downside risk is limited. There are also some investors who believe that low Price to Earnings ratio reflects the low pricing because a given company is in trouble. On the other hand, a higher PE ratio means that investors are paying more for each unit of profit.
Chesapeake Utilities |
| = | 28.07 X |
Generally speaking, the Price to Earnings ratio gives investors an idea of what the market is willing to pay for the company's current earnings.
Chesapeake Price To Earning Comparison
Chesapeake Utilities is currently under evaluation for price to earning within its peer group.
Chesapeake Utilities Profitability Projections
Profits drive shareholder value, and Chesapeake Utilities' profit trends deserve careful review. Profit ratios for Chesapeake Utilities should be tracked across many periods to tell trends from noise. Chesapeake Utilities currently maintains a profit margin of 15.1%. A rising operating margin signals that Chesapeake Utilities' core business is getting more efficient. The operating margin stands at 28.5% while return on equity is 9.4%.
| Last Reported | End Of Year Estimate | ||
| Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income | 9.9 M | 10.4 M | |
| Operating Income | 257.6 M | 270.5 M | |
| Total Other Income Expense Net | -64.6 M | -61.4 M | |
| Net Income | 140.3 M | 147.3 M | |
| Income Tax Expense | 52.7 M | 55.3 M | |
| Income Before Tax | 193 M | 202.7 M | |
| Net Income Applicable To Common Shares | 136.4 M | 143.2 M | |
| Net Income From Continuing Ops | 140.3 M | 71.6 M | |
| Non Operating Income Net Other | 5.8 M | 6.1 M | |
| Interest Income | 78.7 M | 82.6 M | |
| Net Interest Income | -72.5 M | -68.9 M | |
| Change To Netincome | 26.8 M | 22.2 M | |
| Net Income Per Share | 6.00 | 6.30 | |
| Income Quality | 1.67 | 2.52 | |
| Net Income Per E B T | 0.73 | 0.52 |
Chesapeake Profitability Driver Comparison
The key profitability drivers of Chesapeake Utilities determine how much profit the company generates over time. External shocks can disrupt Chesapeake Utilities' financial results at any time, adding an inherent layer of unpredictability.
Earnings Estimation Breakdown
Analyst consensus for Chesapeake Utilities places the projected EPS at 1.1217 for the upcoming period. This estimate is bounded by a low of 1.06 and a high of 1.185 across all analyst models covering Chesapeake Utilities. Trailing twelve-month reporting data forms the basis of this projection, with non-recurring items excluded from the calculation.Last Reported EPS
1.06 Lowest | Expected EPS | 1.19 Highest |
Earnings Projection Consensus
Valuation signals derived from Chesapeake Utilities' consensus EPS estimate versus market price offer a directional view of relative attractiveness. A positive gap may indicate room for repricing toward the estimate; a negative gap may suggest the market has already priced in growth fully. These scenarios should be reviewed within the context of earnings quality, sector dynamics, and macroeconomic conditions.
| Number of Analysts | Historical Accuracy | Last Reported EPS | Estimated EPS for 30th of June 2026 | Current EPS (TTM) | |
| 5 | 87.06% | 0.0 | 1.1217 | 5.98 |
Earnings per Share Projection vs Actual
Actual EPS for Chesapeake Utilities is reported directly from its income statement at each quarterly disclosure event. Analyst-projected EPS for Chesapeake Utilities represents the consensus expectation for what Chesapeake Utilities will earn in future quarters. A rising EPS trend generally signals improving profitability; the weighted average adjusts for changes in share count through the period.Estimated Months Earnings per Share
EPS is a cornerstone metric for income-focused investors in Chesapeake Utilities, offering a direct read on per-share profitability and dividend coverage capacity. A growing EPS trajectory suggests the company is better positioned to sustain and increase distributions over time. Investors should always evaluate Chesapeake Utilities' EPS relative to peers and in combination with cash flow and balance sheet data.Quarterly Analyst Estimates and Surprise Metrics
Analysts spend considerable effort projecting Chesapeake Utilities' quarterly EPS using management guidance, industry data, and financial models. When results deviate materially from these projections, markets reprice quickly and decisively. Understanding the surprise history gives investors a data-driven framework for setting expectations around upcoming reporting events.
| Reported | Fiscal Date | Estimated EPS | Reported EPS | Surprise | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
null | null | null | null | null | 0 | ||
2026-02-25 | 2025-12-31 | 2.06 | 1.94 | -0.12 | 5 | ||
2025-11-06 | 2025-09-30 | 1.01 | 0.82 | -0.19 | 18 | ||
2025-08-07 | 2025-06-30 | 1.02 | 1.04 | 0.02 | 1 | ||
2025-05-06 | 2025-03-31 | 2.246 | 2.22 | -0.026 | 1 | ||
2025-02-19 | 2024-12-31 | 1.635 | 1.63 | -0.005 | 0 | ||
2024-11-07 | 2024-09-30 | 0.67 | 0.78 | 0.11 | 16 | ||
2024-08-08 | 2024-06-30 | 0.8 | 0.82 | 0.02 | 2 | ||
2024-05-08 | 2024-03-31 | 2.12 | 2.07 | -0.05 | 2 | ||
2024-02-21 | 2023-12-31 | 1.56 | 1.26 | -0.3 | 19 | ||
2023-11-02 | 2023-09-30 | 0.63 | 0.53 | -0.1 | 15 | ||
2023-08-03 | 2023-06-30 | 0.96 | 0.9 | -0.06 | 6 | ||
2023-05-03 | 2023-03-31 | 2.11 | 2.04 | -0.07 | 3 | ||
2023-02-22 | 2022-12-31 | 1.44 | 1.47 | 0.03 | 2 | ||
2022-11-02 | 2022-09-30 | 0.74 | 0.54 | -0.2 | 27 | ||
2022-08-03 | 2022-06-30 | 0.83 | 0.96 | 0.13 | 15 | ||
2022-05-03 | 2022-03-31 | 1.99 | 2.08 | 0.09 | 4 | ||
2022-02-23 | 2021-12-31 | 1.31 | 1.28 | -0.03 | 2 | ||
2021-11-03 | 2021-09-30 | 0.58 | 0.71 | 0.13 | 22 | ||
2021-08-04 | 2021-06-30 | 0.67 | 0.78 | 0.11 | 16 | ||
2021-05-04 | 2021-03-31 | 1.84 | 1.96 | 0.12 | 6 | ||
2021-02-24 | 2020-12-31 | 1.15 | 1.24 | 0.09 | 7 | ||
2020-11-04 | 2020-09-30 | 0.49 | 0.56 | 0.07 | 14 | ||
2020-08-05 | 2020-06-30 | 0.6 | 0.66 | 0.06 | 10 | ||
2020-05-06 | 2020-03-31 | 1.81 | 1.76 | -0.05 | 2 | ||
2020-02-26 | 2019-12-31 | 1.14 | 1.37 | 0.23 | 20 | ||
2019-11-07 | 2019-09-30 | 0.39 | 0.34 | -0.05 | 12 | ||
2019-08-08 | 2019-06-30 | 0.55 | 0.5 | -0.05 | 9 | ||
2019-05-08 | 2019-03-31 | 1.59 | 1.68 | 0.09 | 5 | ||
2019-02-26 | 2018-12-31 | 1.2 | 1.1 | -0.1 | 8 | ||
2018-11-08 | 2018-09-30 | 0.49 | 0.34 | -0.15 | 30 | ||
2018-08-09 | 2018-06-30 | 0.51 | 0.48 | -0.03 | 5 | ||
2018-05-08 | 2018-03-31 | 1.36 | 1.4 | 0.04 | 2 | ||
2018-02-28 | 2017-12-31 | 0.87 | 0.93 | 0.06 | 6 | ||
2017-11-09 | 2017-09-30 | 0.35 | 0.42 | 0.07 | 20 | ||
2017-08-03 | 2017-06-30 | 0.52 | 0.37 | -0.15 | 28 | ||
2017-05-03 | 2017-03-31 | 1.41 | 1.17 | -0.24 | 17 | ||
2017-02-27 | 2016-12-31 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2016-11-03 | 2016-09-30 | 0.4 | 0.29 | -0.11 | 27 | ||
2016-08-04 | 2016-06-30 | 0.49 | 0.52 | 0.03 | 6 | ||
2016-05-04 | 2016-03-31 | 1.5 | 1.6 | 0.1 | 6 | ||
2016-02-25 | 2015-12-31 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.02 | 2 | ||
2015-11-05 | 2015-09-30 | 0.24 | 0.33 | 0.09 | 37 | ||
2015-08-06 | 2015-06-30 | 0.4 | 0.41 | 0.01 | 2 | ||
2015-05-06 | 2015-03-31 | 1.16 | 1.44 | 0.28 | 24 | ||
2015-03-05 | 2014-12-31 | 0.68 | 0.97 | 0.29 | 42 | ||
2014-11-06 | 2014-09-30 | 0.25 | 0.22 | -0.03 | 12 | ||
2014-08-07 | 2014-06-30 | 0.32 | 0.35 | 0.03 | 9 | ||
2014-05-06 | 2014-03-31 | 1.04 | 1.21 | 0.17 | 16 | ||
2014-03-06 | 2013-12-31 | 0.66 | 0.67 | 0.01 | 1 | ||
2013-11-07 | 2013-09-30 | 0.25 | 0.27 | 0.02 | 8 | ||
2013-08-09 | 2013-06-30 | 0.38 | 0.3 | -0.08 | 21 | ||
2013-05-02 | 2013-03-31 | 0.9 | 1.03 | 0.13 | 14 | ||
2013-03-07 | 2012-12-31 | 0.58 | 0.68 | 0.1 | 17 | ||
2012-11-07 | 2012-09-30 | 0.16 | 0.22 | 0.06 | 37 | ||
2012-08-08 | 2012-06-30 | 0.26 | 0.35 | 0.09 | 34 | ||
2012-05-02 | 2012-03-31 | 0.94 | 0.74 | -0.2 | 21 | ||
2012-03-07 | 2011-12-31 | 0.5 | 0.55 | 0.05 | 10 | ||
2011-11-03 | 2011-09-30 | 0.15 | 0.12 | -0.03 | 20 | ||
2011-08-04 | 2011-06-30 | 0.27 | 0.25 | -0.02 | 7 | ||
2011-05-04 | 2011-03-31 | 1.01 | 0.95 | -0.06 | 5 | ||
2011-03-07 | 2010-12-31 | 0.38 | 0.49 | 0.11 | 28 | ||
2010-11-04 | 2010-09-30 | 0.01 | 0.11 | 0.1 | 1000 | ||
2010-08-05 | 2010-06-30 | 0.13 | 0.23 | 0.1 | 76 | ||
2010-05-05 | 2010-03-31 | 0.84 | 0.98 | 0.14 | 16 | ||
2010-03-05 | 2009-12-31 | 0.43 | 0.47 | 0.04 | 9 | ||
2009-11-05 | 2009-09-30 | -0.02 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 250 | ||
2009-08-06 | 2009-06-30 | 0.19 | 0.08 | -0.11 | 57 | ||
2009-05-04 | 2009-03-31 | 0.77 | 0.83 | 0.06 | 7 | ||
2009-03-09 | 2008-12-31 | 0.42 | 0.43 | 0.01 | 2 | ||
2008-11-07 | 2008-09-30 | -0.04 | -0.02 | 0.02 | 50 | ||
2008-08-11 | 2008-06-30 | 0.15 | 0.18 | 0.03 | 20 | ||
2008-05-05 | 2008-03-31 | 0.82 | 0.73 | -0.09 | 10 | ||
2008-03-05 | 2007-12-31 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2007-11-07 | 2007-09-30 | -0.07 | -0.03 | 0.04 | 57 | ||
2007-08-07 | 2007-06-30 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2007-05-01 | 2007-03-31 | 0.73 | 0.79 | 0.06 | 8 | ||
2007-03-01 | 2006-12-31 | 0.46 | 0.41 | -0.05 | 10 | ||
2006-11-09 | 2006-09-30 | -0.07 | -0.07 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2006-08-08 | 2006-06-30 | 0.1 | 0.13 | 0.03 | 30 | ||
2006-05-05 | 2006-03-31 | 0.72 | 0.67 | -0.05 | 6 | ||
2006-02-27 | 2005-12-31 | 0.43 | 0.46 | 0.03 | 6 | ||
2005-11-04 | 2005-09-30 | -0.06 | -0.08 | -0.02 | 33 | ||
2005-08-05 | 2005-06-30 | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2005-04-29 | 2005-03-31 | 0.68 | 0.7 | 0.02 | 2 | ||
2005-03-01 | 2004-12-31 | 0.41 | 0.43 | 0.02 | 4 | ||
2004-11-05 | 2004-09-30 | -0.07 | -0.08 | -0.01 | 14 | ||
2004-08-05 | 2004-06-30 | 0.13 | 0.07 | -0.06 | 46 | ||
2004-05-03 | 2004-03-31 | 0.71 | 0.66 | -0.05 | 7 | ||
2004-03-08 | 2003-12-31 | 0.15 | 0.37 | 0.22 | 146 | ||
2003-11-04 | 2003-09-30 | -0.13 | -0.08 | 0.05 | 38 | ||
2003-08-08 | 2003-06-30 | 0.03 | 0.14 | 0.11 | 366 | ||
2003-05-12 | 2003-03-31 | 0.67 | 0.77 | 0.1 | 14 | ||
2003-03-03 | 2002-12-31 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2002-10-30 | 2002-09-30 | -0.1 | -0.11 | -0.01 | 10 | ||
2002-07-31 | 2002-06-30 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2002-05-14 | 2002-03-31 | 0.73 | 0.6 | -0.13 | 17 | ||
2002-02-26 | 2001-12-31 | 0.21 | 0.17 | -0.04 | 19 | ||
2001-11-02 | 2001-09-30 | -0.13 | -0.09 | 0.04 | 30 | ||
2001-07-31 | 2001-06-30 | 0.04 | 0.08 | 0.04 | 100 | ||
2001-02-26 | 2000-12-31 | 0.37 | 0.31 | -0.06 | 16 | ||
2000-11-01 | 2000-09-30 | -0.1 | -0.13 | -0.03 | 30 | ||
2000-08-09 | 2000-06-30 | 0.13 | 0.04 | -0.09 | 69 | ||
2000-02-28 | 1999-12-31 | 0.37 | 0.31 | -0.06 | 16 | ||
1999-10-29 | 1999-09-30 | -0.13 | -0.1 | 0.03 | 23 | ||
1999-08-03 | 1999-06-30 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0 |
Use Chesapeake Utilities in pair-trading
Pair analysis around Chesapeake Utilities matters because it can turn one security idea into a more market-neutral structure. The key question is whether the second leg adds real hedge value instead of just creating a more complex version of the same risk.
Chesapeake Utilities Pair Trading
Chesapeake Utilities Pair Trading Analysis
Tax-loss harvesting on Chesapeake Utilities requires identifying a similar asset for the 30-day wash-sale period. Assets with high correlation to Chesapeake Utilities can serve as substitutes while preserving market exposure.
Correlation analysis for Chesapeake Utilities reveals which assets move together and which provide hedging benefits. Pairing Chesapeake Utilities with uncorrelated instruments can reduce portfolio volatility without reducing expected returns.
Chesapeake Utilities' hedging context can be framed through Correlation analysis and pair-based evaluation. Cross-sector pair evaluation can broaden the hedging context for Chesapeake Utilities.Use Investing Themes to Complement your Chesapeake Utilities position
With 3.03 Billion market cap in the Utilities—Regulated Gas industry, Chesapeake Utilities works well as a smaller-cap core holding around which broader thematic baskets can be built. For Chesapeake Utilities in Utilities—Regulated Gas, the theme workflow defines the investment thesis first, then optimizes which Utilities assets best express that view at the smaller-cap level.
Did You Try This Idea?
Run Gold ETFs Thematic Idea Now
Gold ETFs
ETF themes focus on helping investors to gain exposure to a broad range of assets, diversify, and lower overall costs. The Gold ETFs theme has 23 constituents at this time.
Investors can hold the Gold ETFs Theme as a long-term basket or actively trade individual constituents to capture short-term price movement.
| View All Next | Launch |