Affiliated Managers Net Income vs. Price To Sales
| AMG Stock | USD 271.95 1.52 0.56% |
Net Income | First Reported 1997-03-31 | Previous Quarter 212.4 M | Current Value 347.6 M | Quarterly Volatility 99.1 M |
Macro event markers
| Current Value | Last Year | Change From Last Year | 10 Year Trend | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Profit Margin | 0.74 | 0.8604 |
|
| |||||
| Operating Profit Margin | 0.27 | 0.3176 |
|
|
This module outlines profitability drivers for Affiliated Managers, highlighting margins, returns, and income efficiency.
Affiliated | Build AI portfolio with Affiliated Stock |
Macro event markers
Quarterly Earnings Growth 1.221 | Dividend Share 0.04 | Earnings Share 22.74 | Revenue Per Share | Quarterly Revenue Growth 0.062 |
Understanding Affiliated Managers includes distinguishing between market value and book value, where book value reflects Affiliated's accounting equity. Affiliated Managers' market capitalization is 7.61 B. A P/B ratio of 2.32 indicates the market values Affiliated Managers above its accounting book value. Enterprise value stands at 9.55 B. Intrinsic value reflects what Affiliated Managers' fundamentals imply about worth, which may differ from both the trading price and the book figure. Analytical frameworks help reconcile those views.
It is useful to distinguish Affiliated Managers' value from its trading price, which are computed with different methods. For Affiliated Managers, key inputs include a P/E ratio of 19.39, a P/B ratio of 2.32, a profit margin of 34.54%, and ROE of 19.93%. The quoted price is simply the exchange level where supply meets demand.
Affiliated Managers Price To Sales vs. Net Income Fundamental Analysis
Comparative pricing analysis measures Affiliated Managers's value against industry norms. Affiliated Managers Group ranks second among stocks in net income across its competitive set. It is rated below average in price to sales across its competitive set . Affiliated Managers Group carries a 195,418,598 x Net Income-to-Price To Sales ratio. Financial indicators imply that Net Income is moving in a progressing direction. Previously, Net Income was valued at 716.6 Million. Comparative metrics assess Affiliated Managers's relative pricing efficiency.Affiliated Price To Sales vs. Net Income
Net income is the profit of a company for the reporting period, which is derived after taking revenues and gains and subtracting all expenses and losses. Net income is one of the most-watched numbers by money managers as well as individual investors.
Affiliated Managers |
| = | 716.6 M |
Because income is reported on the Income Statement of a company and is measured in dollars some investors prefer to use Profit Margin, which measures income as a percentage of sales.
Price to Sales ratio is typically used for valuing equity relative to its own past performance as well as to performance of other companies or market indexes. In most cases, the lower the ratio, the better it is for investors. However, it is advisable for investors to exercise caution when looking at price-to-sales ratios across different industries.
Affiliated Managers |
| = | 3.67 X |
The most critical factor to remember is that the price of equity takes a firm's debt into account, whereas the sales indicators do not consider financial leverage. Generally speaking, Price to Sales ratio shows how much market values every dollar of the company's sales.
Affiliated Price To Sales Comparison
Affiliated Managers is currently under evaluation in price to sales across its competitive set.
Affiliated Managers Profitability Projections
The most important aspect of a successful company is its ability to generate a profit. For investors in Affiliated Managers, profitability is also one of the essential criteria for including it into their portfolios because, without profit, Affiliated Managers will eventually generate negative long term returns. The profitability progress is the general direction of Affiliated Managers' change in net profit over the period of time. It can combine multiple indicators of Affiliated Managers, where stable trends show no significant progress. An accelerating trend is seen as positive, while a decreasing one is unfavorable. A rising trend means that profits are rising, and operational efficiency may be rising as well. A decreasing trend is a sign of poor performance and may indicate upcoming losses.
| Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
| Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income | -106.8 M | -101.5 M | |
| Operating Income | 776.8 M | 545 M | |
| Income Before Tax | 1.2 B | 1.2 B | |
| Total Other Income Expense Net | 409.5 M | 430 M | |
| Net Income | 716.6 M | 446.5 M | |
| Income Tax Expense | 282.3 M | 296.4 M | |
| Net Income Applicable To Common Shares | 716.6 M | 752.4 M | |
| Net Income From Continuing Ops | 904 M | 818.5 M | |
| Non Operating Income Net Other | 1.1 B | 1.2 B | |
| Interest Income | 409.5 M | 288.4 M | |
| Net Interest Income | -136.5 M | -143.3 M | |
| Change To Netincome | -380.6 M | -361.6 M | |
| Net Income Per Share | 25.14 | 26.40 | |
| Income Quality | 1.41 | 2.06 | |
| Net Income Per E B T | 0.60 | 0.63 |
Affiliated Profitability Driver Comparison
The profitability drivers of Affiliated Managers are the most direct determinants of its earnings and investment outlook. Investors face many external uncertainties - from tax policy changes to commodity price movements - that can affect Affiliated Managers' profitability during any given holding period.
Earnings Estimation Breakdown
Analyst consensus points to a next EPS of 6.57 for Affiliated Managers, supported by trailing twelve-month earnings data from Affiliated Managers Group. The full range of analyst projections spans 8.03 to 8.25, quantifying the uncertainty in the forward estimate. One-time items are stripped from this figure to reflect the ongoing earnings run rate.Last Reported EPS
8.03 Lowest | Expected EPS | 8.25 Highest |
Earnings Projection Consensus
When analyst consensus implies a fair value for Affiliated Managers above today's price, it creates a positive valuation gap that some investors associate with upside potential. A fair value below the current price does not automatically mean overvalued - growth-oriented stocks often trade above near-term earnings models. Use this signal as a starting point for deeper due diligence, not a standalone investment decision.
| Number of Analysts | Historical Accuracy | Last Reported EPS | Estimated EPS for 31st of March 2026 | Current EPS (TTM) | |
| 7 | 95.01% | 9.48 | 6.57 | 22.74 |
Earnings History
Analyst EPS consensus for Affiliated Managers' stock is widely tracked by institutional and individual investors as an earnings performance benchmark. The gap between consensus and actual results determines whether the stock is classified as a beat, miss, or in-line performer. Balance EPS consensus analysis with cash flow and margin trend evaluation for best results.Affiliated Managers Quarterly Gross Profit | 667 Million |
While mean reversion in Affiliated Managers is a statistically observable tendency, it operates on uncertain timelines. Positions sized too aggressively against the trend can suffer sustained losses before reversion occurs.
Earnings per Share Projection vs Actual
Actual Earnings per Share of Affiliated Managers refers to what the company shows during its earnings calls or quarterly reports. The Expected EPS is what analysts covering Affiliated Managers Group predict the company's earnings will be in the future. The higher the earnings per share of Affiliated Managers, the better its profitability. While calculating the Earnings per Share, we use the weighted ratio, as the number of shares outstanding can change over time.Estimated Months Earnings per Share
Investors seeking income from Affiliated Managers should treat EPS as a first-order signal of dividend sustainability, but not the only one. Cash flow from operations, capital expenditure requirements, and debt obligations all influence the effective dividend capacity beyond what EPS alone reveals. A peer-relative EPS comparison adds a sector-adjusted dimension to income risk analysis.Quarterly Analyst Estimates and Surprise Metrics
The earnings surprise mechanism works because analyst consensus sets the market's reference point before each Affiliated Managers report. Reported EPS that exceeds this reference triggers upward repricing; EPS below it triggers downward adjustment. Analyst consensus reflects the aggregated output of models that track guidance, comparables, and macro assumptions.
| Reported | Fiscal Date | Estimated EPS | Reported EPS | Surprise | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2026-02-04 | 2025-12-31 | 8.74 | 9.48 | 0.74 | 8 | ||
2025-11-03 | 2025-09-30 | 5.78 | 6.1 | 0.32 | 5 | ||
2025-07-31 | 2025-06-30 | 5.29 | 5.39 | 0.1 | 1 | ||
2025-05-08 | 2025-03-31 | 5.09 | 5.2 | 0.11 | 2 | ||
2025-02-06 | 2024-12-31 | 4.13 | 4.92 | 0.79 | 19 | ||
2024-11-04 | 2024-09-30 | 4.84 | 4.82 | -0.02 | 0 | ||
2024-07-29 | 2024-06-30 | 4.61 | 4.67 | 0.06 | 1 | ||
2024-05-06 | 2024-03-31 | 5.23 | 5.37 | 0.14 | 2 | ||
2024-02-05 | 2023-12-31 | 6.02 | 6.86 | 0.84 | 13 | ||
2023-11-06 | 2023-09-30 | 3.75 | 4.08 | 0.33 | 8 | ||
2023-07-26 | 2023-06-30 | 4.23 | 4.45 | 0.22 | 5 | ||
2023-05-01 | 2023-03-31 | 4.16 | 4.18 | 0.02 | 0 | ||
2023-02-06 | 2022-12-31 | 7.06 | 7.28 | 0.22 | 3 | ||
2022-11-07 | 2022-09-30 | 3.93 | 4.21 | 0.28 | 7 | ||
2022-08-01 | 2022-06-30 | 3.95 | 4.03 | 0.08 | 2 | ||
2022-05-02 | 2022-03-31 | 4.34 | 4.65 | 0.31 | 7 | ||
2022-02-07 | 2021-12-31 | 5.81 | 6.1 | 0.29 | 4 | ||
2021-11-01 | 2021-09-30 | 3.91 | 4.0 | 0.09 | 2 | ||
2021-07-28 | 2021-06-30 | 3.85 | 4.03 | 0.18 | 4 | ||
2021-05-03 | 2021-03-31 | 4.24 | 4.28 | 0.04 | 0 | ||
2021-02-08 | 2020-12-31 | 3.71 | 4.22 | 0.51 | 13 | ||
2020-10-26 | 2020-09-30 | 2.84 | 3.27 | 0.43 | 15 | ||
2020-07-27 | 2020-06-30 | 2.71 | 2.74 | 0.03 | 1 | ||
2020-04-27 | 2020-03-31 | 3.08 | 3.16 | 0.08 | 2 | ||
2020-02-03 | 2019-12-31 | 4.09 | 4.52 | 0.43 | 10 | ||
2019-10-28 | 2019-09-30 | 3.14 | 3.16 | 0.02 | 0 | ||
2019-07-29 | 2019-06-30 | 3.19 | 3.33 | 0.14 | 4 | ||
2019-05-06 | 2019-03-31 | 3.26 | 3.26 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2019-02-04 | 2018-12-31 | 3.51 | 3.53 | 0.02 | 0 | ||
2018-10-29 | 2018-09-30 | 3.42 | 3.45 | 0.03 | 0 | ||
2018-07-30 | 2018-06-30 | 3.59 | 3.61 | 0.02 | 0 | ||
2018-04-30 | 2018-03-31 | 3.89 | 3.92 | 0.03 | 0 | ||
2018-01-29 | 2017-12-31 | 4.53 | 4.68 | 0.15 | 3 | ||
2017-10-30 | 2017-09-30 | 3.36 | 3.41 | 0.05 | 1 | ||
2017-07-31 | 2017-06-30 | 3.24 | 3.33 | 0.09 | 2 | ||
2017-05-01 | 2017-03-31 | 3.18 | 3.21 | 0.03 | 0 | ||
2017-01-30 | 2016-12-31 | 3.71 | 3.8 | 0.09 | 2 | ||
2016-10-31 | 2016-09-30 | 3 | 3.02 | 0.02 | 0 | ||
2016-08-01 | 2016-06-30 | 3.01 | 3.06 | 0.05 | 1 | ||
2016-05-03 | 2016-03-31 | 2.92 | 2.94 | 0.02 | 0 | ||
2016-02-02 | 2015-12-31 | 3.6 | 3.61 | 0.01 | 0 | ||
2015-11-09 | 2015-09-30 | 2.87 | 2.93 | 0.06 | 2 | ||
2015-07-28 | 2015-06-30 | 3.02 | 3.08 | 0.06 | 1 | ||
2015-04-28 | 2015-03-31 | 2.9 | 2.91 | 0.01 | 0 | ||
2015-01-27 | 2014-12-31 | 3.45 | 3.55 | 0.1 | 2 | ||
2014-11-03 | 2014-09-30 | 2.71 | 2.76 | 0.05 | 1 | ||
2014-07-29 | 2014-06-30 | 2.6 | 2.65 | 0.05 | 1 | ||
2014-04-29 | 2014-03-31 | 2.38 | 2.48 | 0.1 | 4 | ||
2014-02-04 | 2013-12-31 | 3.09 | 3.66 | 0.57 | 18 | ||
2013-11-05 | 2013-09-30 | 2.15 | 2.19 | 0.04 | 1 | ||
2013-07-30 | 2013-06-30 | 2.1 | 2.18 | 0.08 | 3 | ||
2013-04-30 | 2013-03-31 | 2.03 | 2.27 | 0.24 | 11 | ||
2013-01-29 | 2012-12-31 | 2.43 | 2.55 | 0.12 | 4 | ||
2012-10-31 | 2012-09-30 | 1.88 | 1.91 | 0.03 | 1 | ||
2012-07-31 | 2012-06-30 | 1.64 | 1.66 | 0.02 | 1 | ||
2012-05-01 | 2012-03-31 | 1.56 | 1.58 | 0.02 | 1 | ||
2012-01-31 | 2011-12-31 | 1.73 | 1.76 | 0.03 | 1 | ||
2011-10-25 | 2011-09-30 | 1.52 | 1.55 | 0.03 | 1 | ||
2011-07-26 | 2011-06-30 | 1.64 | 1.71 | 0.07 | 4 | ||
2011-04-26 | 2011-03-31 | 1.59 | 1.6 | 0.01 | 0 | ||
2011-02-01 | 2010-12-31 | 1.93 | 2.02 | 0.09 | 4 | ||
2010-10-26 | 2010-09-30 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2010-07-27 | 2010-06-30 | 1.25 | 1.35 | 0.1 | 8 | ||
2010-04-27 | 2010-03-31 | 1.14 | 1.14 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2010-02-01 | 2009-12-31 | 1.31 | 1.36 | 0.05 | 3 | ||
2009-10-28 | 2009-09-30 | 1.04 | 1.05 | 0.01 | 0 | ||
2009-07-29 | 2009-06-30 | 0.96 | 1.0 | 0.04 | 4 | ||
2009-04-29 | 2009-03-31 | 0.92 | 0.94 | 0.02 | 2 | ||
2009-01-28 | 2008-12-31 | 1.21 | 1.3 | 0.09 | 7 | ||
2008-10-22 | 2008-09-30 | 1.24 | 1.31 | 0.07 | 5 | ||
2008-07-23 | 2008-06-30 | 1.41 | 1.43 | 0.02 | 1 | ||
2008-04-23 | 2008-03-31 | 1.46 | 1.46 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2008-01-30 | 2007-12-31 | 2.1 | 2.15 | 0.05 | 2 | ||
2007-10-24 | 2007-09-30 | 1.54 | 1.56 | 0.02 | 1 | ||
2007-07-25 | 2007-06-30 | 1.49 | 1.52 | 0.03 | 2 | ||
2007-04-25 | 2007-03-31 | 1.41 | 1.43 | 0.02 | 1 | ||
2007-01-24 | 2006-12-31 | 1.73 | 1.79 | 0.06 | 3 | ||
2006-10-25 | 2006-09-30 | 1.34 | 1.34 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2006-07-26 | 2006-06-30 | 1.28 | 1.3 | 0.02 | 1 | ||
2006-04-26 | 2006-03-31 | 1.26 | 1.27 | 0.01 | 0 | ||
2006-01-25 | 2005-12-31 | 1.29 | 1.42 | 0.13 | 10 | ||
2005-10-26 | 2005-09-30 | 1.18 | 1.18 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2005-07-27 | 2005-06-30 | 1.12 | 1.13 | 0.01 | 0 | ||
2005-04-27 | 2005-03-31 | 1.12 | 1.12 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2005-01-26 | 2004-12-31 | 1.07 | 1.08 | 0.01 | 0 | ||
2004-10-27 | 2004-09-30 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2004-07-28 | 2004-06-30 | 0.98 | 1.0 | 0.02 | 2 | ||
2004-04-28 | 2004-03-31 | 0.92 | 0.92 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2004-01-28 | 2003-12-31 | 0.86 | 0.86 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2003-10-22 | 2003-09-30 | 0.82 | 0.83 | 0.01 | 1 | ||
2003-07-23 | 2003-06-30 | 0.76 | 0.77 | 0.01 | 1 | ||
2003-04-23 | 2003-03-31 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2003-01-29 | 2002-12-31 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 0.02 | 2 | ||
2002-10-23 | 2002-09-30 | 0.7 | 0.72 | 0.02 | 2 | ||
2002-07-24 | 2002-06-30 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 0.02 | 2 | ||
2002-04-24 | 2002-03-31 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.01 | 1 | ||
2002-01-23 | 2001-12-31 | 0.61 | 0.63 | 0.02 | 3 | ||
2001-10-24 | 2001-09-30 | 0.61 | 0.61 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2001-07-25 | 2001-06-30 | 0.62 | 0.63 | 0.01 | 1 | ||
2001-04-25 | 2001-03-31 | 0.59 | 0.59 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2001-01-25 | 2000-12-31 | 0.65 | 0.67 | 0.02 | 3 | ||
2000-10-19 | 2000-09-30 | 0.43 | 0.66 | 0.23 | 53 | ||
2000-07-20 | 2000-06-30 | 0.4 | 0.63 | 0.23 | 57 | ||
2000-04-20 | 2000-03-31 | 0.38 | 0.61 | 0.23 | 60 | ||
2000-01-26 | 1999-12-31 | 0.47 | 1.28 | 0.81 | 172 | ||
1999-10-20 | 1999-09-30 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
1999-07-21 | 1999-06-30 | 0.24 | 0.27 | 0.03 | 12 | ||
1999-04-21 | 1999-03-31 | 0.23 | 0.27 | 0.04 | 17 | ||
1999-01-27 | 1998-12-31 | 0.26 | 0.32 | 0.06 | 23 | ||
1998-10-20 | 1998-09-30 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
1998-07-22 | 1998-06-30 | 0.2 | 0.23 | 0.03 | 15 | ||
1998-04-29 | 1998-03-31 | 0.16 | 0.17 | 0.01 | 6 | ||
1998-02-10 | 1997-12-31 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.02 | 66 |
Use Affiliated Managers in pair-trading
Pair trading with Affiliated Managers can help investors hedge some company-specific exposure by balancing a long view with an offsetting position. The key question is whether the second leg adds real hedge value instead of just creating a more complex version of the same risk.
Affiliated Managers Pair Trading
Affiliated Managers Group Pair Trading Analysis
Correlation matrices help investors optimize their Affiliated Managers tax-loss harvesting strategy by identifying the best available substitutes. The higher the correlation to Affiliated Managers Group, the less the portfolio's risk profile will shift during the wash-sale waiting period.
The pairwise correlation of Affiliated Managers measures the historical tendency for two assets to move in the same or opposite directions. High correlations between Affiliated Managers and another holding indicate concentrated risk that may amplify losses in adverse market conditions.
Use Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Affiliated Managers to review hedging context. The method can be applied across sectors and broader equity sets.Use Investing Themes to Complement your Affiliated Managers position
Using Affiliated Managers Group inside a theme workflow gives investors a structured way to compare related stocks, funds, ETFs, and crypto assets before allocating capital. The practical benefit is that the selected idea can be tuned either for higher upside or for tighter risk control.
Did You Try This Idea?
Run Target Risk ETFs Thematic Idea Now
Target Risk ETFs
ETF themes focus on helping investors to gain exposure to a broad range of assets, diversify, and lower overall costs. The Target Risk ETFs theme has 32 constituents at this time.
You can either use a buy-and-hold strategy to lock in the entire theme or actively trade it to take advantage of the short-term price volatility of individual constituents. Macroaxis can help you discover thousands of investment opportunities in different asset classes. In addition, you can partner with us for reliable portfolio optimization as you plan to utilize Target Risk ETFs Theme or any other thematic opportunities.
| View All Next | Launch |
More Resources for Affiliated Stock Analysis
A comprehensive view of Affiliated Managers starts with financial statements and ratio context. Ratio context helps frame profitability, efficiency, and growth trends for Affiliated Managers Group Stock. Selected reports below provide context for Affiliated Stock:Trending Equities. Analysis related to Affiliated Managers should be read together with other portfolio and risk tools before capital is reallocated. That is especially important when the goal is to improve the overall mix of instruments already held. You can also try the Transaction History module to view history of all your transactions and understand their impact on performance.
Projecting Affiliated Managers' profitability begins with historical financial statements. The core view includes income statement, balance sheet, and cash flow.