Worthington Competitors

Z2J Stock   26.80  -0.91  -3.28%   
The company classifies itself in the Steel industry (Basic Materials sector). Worthington Steel, operates alongside AUST AGRICULTURAL, ALGOMA STEEL, BlueScope Steel, Beauty Farm, and CECO ENVIRONMENTAL and other firms in the same space. This provides context for comparative analysis. This peer module benchmarks Worthington Steel, across key technical and fundamental signals.

Worthington Steel, and Tokyu Construction Correlation Overview

Poor diversification

For the present investment horizon, the measured correlation between Z2J and TCW stands at 0.63, or Poor diversification. The cleaner interpretation is to review correlation beside volatility, expected return, and the role each holding plays in the portfolio.

Moving together with Worthington Stock

  0.89TO Toyota TsushoPairCorr
  0.83ARRJ ArcelorMittalPairCorr
  0.82ARRD ArcelorMittal SAPairCorr
  0.83NUO Nucor CorpPairCorr
  0.82SD5 Steel DynamicsPairCorr

Moving against Worthington Stock

  0.65BYRA BANK RAKYAT INDPairCorr
  0.39PQ9 BANK MANDIRIPairCorr
Specify up to 10 symbols:
Mean reversion opportunities in Worthington Steel,'s arise when market prices disconnect from fundamental anchors such as earnings, book value, or historical price-to-earnings multiples.
Hype
Prediction
LowEstimatedHigh
24.6027.6730.74
Details
Intrinsic
Valuation
LowRealHigh
20.4823.5530.48
Details
Naive
Forecast
LowNextHigh
23.4326.5029.58
Details
Bollinger
Band Projection (param)
LowerMiddle BandUpper
28.1534.7741.39
Details
Relative analysis of Worthington Steel, against direct competitors reveals whether Worthington Steel,'s current valuation reflects a genuine competitive advantage or simply market-wide multiple expansion that applies to all sector peers.

Worthington Steel, Competition Correlation Matrix

Correlation analysis between Worthington Steel and its competitors helps investors understand whether diversification is real or only superficial inside the same peer group. This matrix is most informative when investors want to know whether adding another peer would improve diversification, increase crowding, or leave total risk largely unchanged.

High positive correlations

TCWCQY
TCW9ZY
CQY9ZY
CQYBH5
WCEBH5
TCWBH5
  

High negative correlations

BH5AY5
WCEAY5
CQYXC5
XC5BH5
CQYAY5
TCWXC5

Risk-Adjusted Indicators

There is a big difference between Worthington Stock performing well and Worthington Steel, Company doing well as a business compared to the competition. There are so many exceptions to the norm that investors cannot definitively determine what's good or bad unless they analyze Worthington Steel,'s multiple risk-adjusted performance indicators across the competitive landscape. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.

Worthington Steel, Competitive Analysis

Within its peer group that includes ALGOMA STEEL, BlueScope Steel, and Beauty Farm, Worthington Steel, stands out in several ways. The company commands a 1.48 B market valuation built on 3.09 B in annual revenue. Shareholders see a 10.52% return on equity, supported by a 3.83% profit margin. Worthington Steel, keeps more of each revenue dollar with a 3.83% margin versus -47.22% at ALGOMA STEEL. Top-line revenue favors BlueScope Steel by a wide margin: 16.25 B to 3.09 B. On equity returns, Beauty Farm earns 33.02% compared to 10.52% at Worthington Steel,.
    
 Better Than Average     
    
 Worse Than Peers    View Performance Chart
Z2J AY5 9ZY BH5 XC5 WCE CQY 4KH TCW
 3.28 
26.80
Worthington
 1.27 
0.80
AUST
 7.47 
3.22
ALGOMA
 1.86 
15.80
BlueScope
 0.88 
2.28
Beauty
 0.77 
46.52
CECO
 3.43 
98.50
Construction
 0.00 
0.02
Khiron
 0.63 
7.90
Tokyu
Market Volatility
(90 Days Market Risk)
Market Performance
(90 Days Performance)
Odds of Financial Distress
(Probability Of Bankruptcy)
Current Valuation
(Equity Enterprise Value)
Buy or Sell Analysis
(Average Analysts Consensus)
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Trade Advice
(90 Days Macroaxis Advice)
Current Ratio
Net Asset
Profit Margin
EBITDA
Operating Margin
Current Valuation
Price To Book
Retained Earnings
Five Year Return
Beta
Number Of Employees
Shares Outstanding
Cash Flow From Operations
Annual Yield
Total Debt
Return On Equity
Return On Asset
Book Value Per Share
Total Asset
Last Dividend Paid
Debt To Equity
Target Price
Shares Owned By Institutions
Market Capitalization
Price To Earning
Price To Earnings To Growth
Price To Sales
Net Income
Earnings Per Share
Shares Owned By Insiders
Revenue
Working Capital
Cash And Equivalents
Cash Per Share
Gross Profit
Day Typical Price
Accumulation Distribution
Market Facilitation Index
Daily Balance Of Power
Period Momentum Indicator
Rate Of Daily Change
Day Median Price
Price Action Indicator
Coefficient Of Variation
Mean Deviation
Jensen Alpha
Total Risk Alpha
Sortino Ratio
Downside Variance
Standard Deviation
Kurtosis
Potential Upside
Treynor Ratio
Maximum Drawdown
Variance
Market Risk Adjusted Performance
Risk Adjusted Performance
Skewness
Semi Deviation
Information Ratio
Value At Risk
Expected Short fall
Downside Deviation
Semi Variance

Peer Performance Charts

How to Analyze Worthington Steel, Against Peers

Worthington Steel,'s peer analysis compares Worthington Steel, with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This helps determine whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:
  • Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
  • Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
  • Check valuation dispersion: Review whether Worthington Steel, trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
  • Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
  • Document the thesis: Record where Worthington Steel, leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.
Use this as an educational baseline, then validate conclusions with current filings, market conditions, and portfolio objectives.