Xtera Competitors
| XCOMQ Stock | USD 0.0001 0.00 0.00% |
Correlation: Xtera Communications vs Secured Services Details
No risk reduction
The correlation between XCOMQ and SSVC is 1.0, which Macroaxis classifies as No risk reduction for the selected horizon. Used correctly, the chart helps investors judge whether adding the second position genuinely diversifies the first.
While mean reversion in Xtera Communications is a statistically observable tendency, it operates on uncertain timelines. Positions sized too aggressively against the trend can suffer sustained losses before reversion occurs.
Xtera Communications Competition Correlation Matrix
Correlation analysis between Xtera Communications and its competitors helps investors understand whether diversification is real or only superficial inside the same peer group. This matrix is most informative when investors want to know whether adding another peer would improve diversification, increase crowding, or leave total risk largely unchanged.
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
There is a big difference between Xtera Pink Sheet performing well and Xtera Communications Company doing well as a business compared to the competition. There are so many exceptions to the norm that investors cannot definitively determine what's good or bad unless they analyze Xtera Communications' multiple risk-adjusted performance indicators across the competitive landscape. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RITT | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||
| RPDT | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||
| VOIS | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||
| ALFIQ | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||
| VIDE | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||
| TLDN | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||
| ZVTK | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||
| OTFT | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||
| EMBA | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||
| SSVC | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Xtera Communications Competitive Analysis
Xtera Communications competes directly with RIT Technologies, Rapidtron, and Mind Solutions, and the financial data points to clear areas of divergence. On scale alone, Xtera Communications' 125,740 valuation and 58.7 M revenue define its weight class. Xtera Communications reports a -87.88% net margin, indicating profitability pressure. Top-line revenue favors Xtera Communications by a wide margin: 58.7 M to 6.6 M. Xtera Communications commands the larger valuation at 125,740 versus 108,481. Xtera Communications pulls in 58.7 M in revenue while the other reports 19,898.| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
Peer Performance Charts
How to Analyze Xtera Communications Against Peers
Xtera Communications' peer analysis compares Xtera Communications with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This helps determine whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:- Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
- Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
- Check valuation dispersion: Review whether Xtera Communications trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
- Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
- Document the thesis: Record where Xtera Communications leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.