VANGUARD EMERGING Competition
| VMMSX Fund | USD 29.51 -0.91 -2.99% |
Pair Correlation for VANGUARD EMERGING and SPDR SAMPP Overview
Almost no diversification
The correlation between VMMSX and EDIV is 0.96, which Macroaxis classifies as Almost no diversification for the selected horizon. Used correctly, the chart helps investors judge whether adding the second position genuinely diversifies the first.
Moving together with VANGUARD Mutual Fund
Mean reversion in VANGUARD EMERGING is more reliable over longer time horizons. Short-term deviations can persist and even widen before correcting, making position sizing and risk management critical.
VANGUARD EMERGING Competition Correlation Matrix
Correlation analysis between Vanguard Emerging Markets and its competitors helps investors understand whether diversification is real or only superficial inside the same peer group. This matrix is most informative when investors want to know whether adding another peer would improve diversification, increase crowding, or leave total risk largely unchanged.
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
There is a big difference between VANGUARD Mutual Fund performing well and VANGUARD EMERGING Mutual Fund doing well as a business compared to the competition. There are so many exceptions to the norm that investors cannot definitively determine what's good or bad unless they analyze VANGUARD EMERGING's multiple risk-adjusted performance indicators across the competitive landscape. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YINN | 2.72 | -0.29 | 0.00 | -0.15 | 0.00 | 5.46 | 20.56 | |||
| PEY | 0.67 | 0.07 | 0.09 | 0.08 | 0.69 | 1.86 | 3.56 | |||
| IWC | 1.14 | 0.07 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 1.54 | 1.69 | 6.82 | |||
| OUSM | 0.62 | 0.05 | 0.07 | 0.03 | 0.67 | 1.70 | 3.40 | |||
| SYLD | 0.79 | 0.11 | 0.12 | 0.09 | 0.77 | 2.44 | 4.52 | |||
| DLS | 0.56 | 0.10 | 0.11 | 0.15 | 0.77 | 1.21 | 4.58 | |||
| SDIV | 0.50 | 0.10 | 0.14 | 0.18 | 0.68 | 1.14 | 3.63 | |||
| AIA | 1.17 | 0.28 | 0.17 | 0.24 | 1.42 | 2.52 | 10.03 | |||
| DVYE | 0.70 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.32 | 0.95 | 1.44 | 4.52 | |||
| EDIV | 0.55 | 0.06 | 0.09 | -0.82 | 0.78 | 1.16 | 4.26 |
VANGUARD EMERGING Competitive Analysis
Competitive analysis of VANGUARD EMERGING helps investors understand the drivers behind VANGUARD EMERGING's financial results. Benchmarking VANGUARD EMERGING's performance against peers helps reveal whether its growth and profitability are sustainable.| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
VANGUARD EMERGING Peer Performance Charts
How to Analyze VANGUARD EMERGING Against Peers
VANGUARD EMERGING's peer analysis compares VANGUARD EMERGING with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This helps determine whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:- Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
- Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
- Check valuation dispersion: Review whether VANGUARD EMERGING trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
- Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
- Document the thesis: Record where VANGUARD EMERGING leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.