Thor Competitors
| THXPF Stock | USD 1.08 -0.03 -2.70% |
Thor Explorations and St Barbara Correlation Summary
Very poor diversification
For the present investment horizon, the measured correlation between THXPF and STBMF stands at 0.84, or Very poor diversification. The cleaner interpretation is to review correlation beside volatility, expected return, and the role each holding plays in the portfolio.
Moving together with Thor Pink Sheet
| 0.89 | NEM | Newmont Goldcorp Corp | PairCorr |
| 0.82 | AEM | Agnico Eagle Mines | PairCorr |
| 0.89 | WPM | Wheaton Precious Metals | PairCorr |
| 0.84 | AU | AngloGold Ashanti plc | PairCorr |
| 0.84 | ZIJMY | Zijin Mining Group | PairCorr |
Moving against Thor Pink Sheet
The mean reversion framework for Thor Explorations is built on the premise that markets are not perfectly efficient and that prices periodically overshoot their intrinsic value in both directions.
Thor Explorations Competition Correlation Matrix
Correlation analysis between Thor Explorations and its competitors helps investors understand whether diversification is real or only superficial inside the same peer group. This matrix is most informative when investors want to know whether adding another peer would improve diversification, increase crowding, or leave total risk largely unchanged.
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
There is a big difference between Thor Pink Sheet performing well and Thor Explorations Company doing well as a business compared to the competition. There are so many exceptions to the norm that investors cannot definitively determine what's good or bad unless they analyze Thor Explorations' multiple risk-adjusted performance indicators across the competitive landscape. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RMLFF | 2.56 | 0.23 | 0.07 | 0.35 | 2.59 | 6.25 | 24.85 | |||
| ORZCF | 3.78 | 0.72 | 0.12 | 0.31 | 4.79 | 8.33 | 27.68 | |||
| PROBF | 1.41 | 0.47 | 0.26 | 2.03 | 1.02 | 1.54 | 40.87 | |||
| OMGGF | 3.11 | 0.87 | 0.20 | 0.38 | 2.93 | 9.35 | 19.31 | |||
| MAKOF | 2.27 | 0.48 | 0.15 | 0.27 | 2.66 | 5.28 | 13.16 | |||
| MLXEF | 2.92 | 0.73 | 0.17 | 0.67 | 3.31 | 7.06 | 18.27 | |||
| BLNMF | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||
| SGLFF | 2.32 | 0.67 | 0.00 | -1.12 | 0.00 | 9.76 | 33.12 | |||
| STPGF | 3.18 | -0.15 | 0.00 | 0.14 | 0.00 | 6.52 | 24.13 | |||
| STBMF | 3.56 | 0.80 | 0.12 | -1.01 | 3.31 | 12.00 | 27.84 |
Thor Explorations Competitive Analysis
Thor Explorations' competitive standing becomes clearer when measured alongside Rusoro Mining, Orezone Gold, and Probe Metals. With 7.8 M in revenue and a 143.9 M market value, Thor Explorations anchors one end of the peer spectrum. Profitability stands at a 10.38% net margin with return on equity reaching 21.36%. Thor Explorations dwarfs Rusoro Mining on market cap at 143.9 M versus 31.7 M. Return on equity favors Thor Explorations at 21.36%, well ahead of Orezone Gold at -11.74%. On equity returns, Thor Explorations earns 21.36% compared to -100.14% at Probe Metals.| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
Peer Performance Charts
How to Analyze Thor Explorations Against Peers
Thor Explorations' peer analysis compares Thor Explorations with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This helps determine whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:- Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
- Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
- Check valuation dispersion: Review whether Thor Explorations trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
- Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
- Document the thesis: Record where Thor Explorations leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.