Touchstone Dynamic Competition
| TDI Etf | USD 41.95 0.25 0.60% |
Touchstone Dynamic vs Vivid Seats Correlation Summary
Very good diversification
The correlation between TDI and SEAT is -0.41, which Macroaxis classifies as Very good diversification for the selected horizon. Used correctly, the chart helps investors judge whether adding the second position genuinely diversifies the first.
Moving together with Touchstone Etf
| 1.0 | VEA | Vanguard FTSE Developed | PairCorr |
| 0.99 | IEFA | iShares Core MSCI | PairCorr |
| 0.99 | VEU | Vanguard FTSE All | PairCorr |
| 0.98 | EFA | iShares MSCI EAFE | PairCorr |
| 0.98 | IXUS | iShares Core MSCI | PairCorr |
Moving against Touchstone Etf
The concept of mean reversion suggests that Touchstone Dynamic's price will eventually return toward its long-run average. High prices may deter value investors, while unusually low prices often attract buyers who anticipate a recovery.
Touchstone Dynamic Competition Correlation Matrix
Correlation analysis between Touchstone Dynamic International and its competitors helps investors understand whether diversification is real or only superficial inside the same peer group. This matrix is most informative when investors want to know whether adding another peer would improve diversification, increase crowding, or leave total risk largely unchanged.
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Touchstone Dynamic Constituents Risk-Adjusted Indicators
There is a big difference between Touchstone Etf performing well and Touchstone Dynamic ETF doing well as a business compared to the competition. There are so many exceptions to the norm that investors cannot definitively determine what's good or bad unless they analyze Touchstone Dynamic's multiple risk-adjusted performance indicators across the competitive landscape. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KORE | 3.38 | 1.53 | 0.65 | -0.97 | 1.30 | 5.45 | 78.98 | |||
| NAMI | 5.14 | -0.24 | 0.00 | 0.48 | 0.00 | 13.95 | 57.29 | |||
| BZFD | 2.81 | -0.18 | 0.00 | -0.08 | 0.00 | 6.67 | 20.40 | |||
| LVO | 3.53 | 0.22 | 0.05 | 0.12 | 3.83 | 6.78 | 30.11 | |||
| FNGR | 3.72 | 0.06 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 4.31 | 9.82 | 22.55 | |||
| KYIV | 2.17 | -0.23 | 0.00 | -0.23 | 0.00 | 3.72 | 16.50 | |||
| MDIA | 3.40 | -0.53 | 0.00 | 0.91 | 0.00 | 6.45 | 19.08 | |||
| MNY | 2.23 | 0.25 | 0.05 | 0.51 | 3.60 | 7.50 | 31.59 | |||
| PODC | 4.04 | 0.19 | 0.04 | 0.25 | 4.41 | 8.86 | 28.63 | |||
| SEAT | 3.99 | 0.07 | 0.01 | 0.06 | 5.66 | 6.86 | 29.57 |
Touchstone Dynamic Competitive Analysis
Analyzing Touchstone Dynamic alongside its competitors can reveal how well the company is executing relative to peers. For longer-term investors, tracking Touchstone Dynamic's market share trends against competition is a key input for investment decisions.| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
Touchstone Dynamic Peer Performance Charts
How to Analyze Touchstone Dynamic Against Peers
Touchstone Dynamic's peer analysis compares Touchstone Dynamic with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This helps determine whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:- Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
- Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
- Check valuation dispersion: Review whether Touchstone Dynamic trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
- Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
- Document the thesis: Record where Touchstone Dynamic leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.