SPDR Barclays Competition
| SPTL Etf | USD 26.06 -0.11 -0.42% |
Pair Correlation for SPDR Barclays and IShares 10 Details
No diversification benefit
SPDR Barclays currently posts a 1.0 correlation with IShares 10, indicating a No diversification benefit relationship for the active sample. The overlap area shows the portion of risk that can be diversified away by holding both instruments together.
Moving together with SPDR Etf
| 0.89 | TLT | iShares 20 Year | PairCorr |
| 0.88 | IEF | iShares 7 10 | PairCorr |
| 1.0 | TLH | iShares 10 20 | PairCorr |
| 0.88 | EDV | Vanguard Extended | PairCorr |
Moving against SPDR Etf
The concept of mean reversion suggests that SPDR Barclays' price will eventually return toward its long-run average. Positions sized too aggressively against the trend can suffer sustained losses before reversion occurs in SPDR Barclays. The mean reversion framework for SPDR Barclays is built on the premise that markets are not perfectly efficient.
SPDR Barclays Competition Correlation Matrix
Competition correlation for SPDR Barclays Long matters because related securities often respond to the same industry, factor, or macro drivers even when their business stories differ. This matrix is most informative when investors want to know whether adding another peer would improve diversification, increase crowding, or leave total risk largely unchanged.
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
SPDR Barclays Constituents Risk-Adjusted Indicators
Evaluating SPDR Etf requires separating price momentum from underlying operating strength versus competitors. Risk-adjusted metrics help compare SPDR Barclays' efficiency and downside exposure against peers on a like-for-like basis. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors evaluate volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across different positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPIB | 0.13 | -0.01 | 0.00 | -0.19 | 0.00 | 0.27 | 0.92 | |||
| ITA | 1.17 | 0.18 | 0.13 | 0.14 | 1.32 | 2.72 | 6.44 | |||
| SPTI | 0.15 | -0.01 | 0.00 | -0.50 | 0.00 | 0.31 | 1.08 | |||
| SCHR | 0.16 | -0.01 | 0.00 | -0.56 | 0.00 | 0.32 | 1.08 | |||
| SPTM | 0.58 | -0.05 | 0.00 | 0.16 | 0.00 | 0.88 | 3.60 | |||
| HDV | 0.50 | 0.15 | 0.31 | 2.49 | 0.35 | 1.34 | 3.33 | |||
| STIP | 0.07 | 0.00 | 0.66 | -0.03 | 0.00 | 0.13 | 0.44 | |||
| PFF | 0.34 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -0.05 | 0.00 | 0.67 | 2.43 | |||
| VFSAX | 0.71 | 0.10 | 0.09 | 0.08 | 1.11 | 1.46 | 5.57 | |||
| TLH | 0.38 | -0.02 | 0.00 | -0.35 | 0.00 | 0.70 | 2.86 |
SPDR Barclays Competitive Analysis
| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
SPDR Barclays Competition Peer Performance Charts
How to Analyze SPDR Barclays Against Peers
SPDR Barclays' peer analysis compares SPDR Barclays with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This helps determine whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:- Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
- Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
- Check valuation dispersion: Review whether SPDR Barclays trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
- Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
- Document the thesis: Record where SPDR Barclays leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.
Peer Comparison Metrics & Methodology
Operating expenses at SPDR Barclays as a share of revenue sit below the peer group midpoint, signaling tighter cost control. Competition analysis adds context to price action by grounding it in relative fundamentals.
Data shown for SPDR Barclays Long is aggregated from fund disclosures and market reference feeds and normalized across reporting formats. Source publication timing can introduce delays.