AIM ETF Competition
| SIXD Etf | USD 28.19 -0.26 -0.91% |
AIM ETF and Horizon Funds Correlation Details
Very good diversification
AIM ETF currently posts a 0.05 correlation with Horizon Funds, indicating a Very good diversification relationship for the active sample. A 0.05 reading means AIM ETF and Horizon Funds have very little price overlap, which supports diversification.
Moving together with AIM Etf
| 0.63 | INOV | Innovator ETFs Trust | PairCorr |
| 0.98 | BUFR | First Trust Cboe | PairCorr |
| 0.77 | BUFD | FT Cboe Vest | PairCorr |
| 0.99 | PSEP | Innovator SAMPP 500 | PairCorr |
| 0.85 | PJAN | Innovator SAMPP 500 | PairCorr |
Moving against AIM Etf
Experienced market participants anticipate that AIM ETF's price will even out over time. Periods when AIM ETF's deviates significantly from its historical mean may warrant further fundamental analysis.
AIM ETF Competition Correlation Matrix
Studying peer correlation around AIM ETF Products gives investors a cleaner read on how much independent price behavior still exists across the competitive set. The useful question is whether competitors are behaving like true alternatives or simply tracking the same sector move with different volatility.
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
AIM ETF Competition Risk-Adjusted Indicators
Strong recent returns in AIM Etf do not always mean AIM ETF ETF is outperforming peers on business quality. Risk-adjusted metrics help compare AIM ETF's efficiency and downside exposure against peers on a like-for-like basis. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors evaluate volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across different positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| META | 1.49 | -0.10 | 0.00 | -0.16 | 0.00 | 2.33 | 14.24 | |||
| MSFT | 1.29 | -0.36 | 0.00 | -0.76 | 0.00 | 2.19 | 13.28 | |||
| UBER | 1.55 | -0.09 | 0.00 | -0.21 | 0.00 | 3.18 | 11.09 | |||
| F | 1.37 | -0.12 | 0.00 | -0.16 | 0.00 | 3.61 | 10.01 | |||
| T | 1.11 | 0.27 | 0.23 | -1.67 | 1.13 | 3.87 | 8.53 | |||
| A | 1.23 | -0.23 | 0.00 | -0.31 | 0.00 | 2.48 | 7.20 | |||
| CRM | 1.87 | -0.47 | 0.00 | -0.80 | 0.00 | 3.41 | 10.53 | |||
| JPM | 1.13 | -0.01 | 0.00 | -0.06 | 0.00 | 2.02 | 8.17 | |||
| MRK | 1.12 | 0.30 | 0.24 | 0.53 | 1.15 | 2.58 | 7.29 | |||
| XOM | 1.28 | 0.53 | 0.38 | 33.64 | 1.06 | 2.90 | 6.83 |
AIM ETF Competitive Analysis
| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
AIM ETF Competition Peer Performance Charts
How to Analyze AIM ETF Against Peers
AIM ETF's peer analysis compares AIM ETF with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This helps determine whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:- Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
- Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
- Check valuation dispersion: Review whether AIM ETF trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
- Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
- Document the thesis: Record where AIM ETF leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.
Peer Comparison Metrics & Methodology
AIM ETF has a wider economic moat score than the average competitor, based on return spread and reinvestment patterns. When AIM ETF and a peer diverge sharply on valuation, the earnings and cash flow data usually explain why. Relative comparison helps show where AIM ETF is stronger or weaker against peers.
Data shown for AIM ETF Products is aggregated from fund disclosures and market reference feeds and normalized across reporting formats. Source publication timing can introduce delays.