Sif Competitors
| SIFG Stock | EUR 6.09 -0.32 -4.99% |
Pair Correlation for Sif Holding and Morefield Group Overview
Good diversification
Across the chosen horizon, SIFG and MORE show a correlation of -0.15 and fall into the Good diversification bucket. The cleaner interpretation is to review correlation beside volatility, expected return, and the role each holding plays in the portfolio.
Moving together with Sif Stock
Mean reversion in Sif Holding is more reliable over longer time horizons. Short-term deviations can persist and even widen before correcting, making position sizing and risk management critical.
Sif Holding Competition Correlation Matrix
Correlation analysis between Sif Holding NV and its competitors helps investors understand whether diversification is real or only superficial inside the same peer group. This matrix is most informative when investors want to know whether adding another peer would improve diversification, increase crowding, or leave total risk largely unchanged.
| -0.72 | 0.31 | 0.82 | -0.68 | ALFEN | ||
| -0.72 | -0.68 | -0.9 | 0.83 | HYDRA | ||
| 0.31 | -0.68 | 0.67 | -0.39 | ENVI | ||
| 0.82 | -0.9 | 0.67 | -0.71 | BRNL | ||
| -0.68 | 0.83 | -0.39 | -0.71 | MORE | ||
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
There is a big difference between Sif Stock performing well and Sif Holding Company doing well as a business compared to the competition. There are so many exceptions to the norm that investors cannot definitively determine what's good or bad unless they analyze Sif Holding's multiple risk-adjusted performance indicators across the competitive landscape. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALFEN | 1.78 | -0.21 | 0.00 | -2.99 | 0.00 | 3.44 | 14.68 | |||
| HYDRA | 1.11 | 0.28 | 0.18 | -1.32 | 0.83 | 3.00 | 9.76 | |||
| ENVI | 2.01 | -0.18 | 0.00 | -0.44 | 0.00 | 3.81 | 14.27 | |||
| BRNL | 1.26 | -0.21 | 0.00 | 1.26 | 0.00 | 2.26 | 9.93 | |||
| MORE | 0.48 | 0.11 | 0.00 | -1.38 | 0.00 | 1.30 | 8.82 |
Sif Holding Competitive Analysis
How does Sif Holding measure up against Alfen Beheer, Hydratec Industries, and Envipco Holding? The financials tell a nuanced story. Sif Holding operates at a 186.8 M scale with 429.0 M flowing through the income statement. With a -13.92% return on equity and -7.05% net margin, Sif Holding faces a more difficult earnings environment than some peers. Alfen Beheer keeps more of each revenue dollar with a -0.04% margin versus -7.05% at Sif Holding. Top-line revenue favors Sif Holding by a wide margin: 429.0 M to 263.1 M. The market prices Sif Holding more richly at 15.24x earnings, while Envipco Holding trades at 4.82x.| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
Peer Performance Charts
How to Analyze Sif Holding Against Peers
Sif Holding's peer analysis compares Sif Holding with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This helps determine whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:- Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
- Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
- Check valuation dispersion: Review whether Sif Holding trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
- Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
- Document the thesis: Record where Sif Holding leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.