IShares Global Competition
| SHIR Etf | 4.28 -0.02 -0.47% |
Pair Correlation for IShares Global and IShares High Details
Significant diversification
The correlation between SHIR and DHYC is 0.05, which Macroaxis classifies as Significant diversification for the selected horizon. This matters because lower overlap can improve diversification, while higher overlap leaves more of the same risk inside the portfolio.
Moving against IShares Etf
The mean reversion tendency in IShares Global's price is a well-documented phenomenon that disciplined investors can exploit by identifying when price has diverged substantially from fundamental and historical anchors.
IShares Global Competition Correlation Matrix
Correlation analysis between iShares Global Aggregate and its competitors helps investors understand whether diversification is real or only superficial inside the same peer group. This matrix is most informative when investors want to know whether adding another peer would improve diversification, increase crowding, or leave total risk largely unchanged.
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
IShares Global Competition Risk-Adjusted Indicators
There is a big difference between IShares Etf performing well and IShares Global ETF doing well as a business compared to the competition. There are so many exceptions to the norm that investors cannot definitively determine what's good or bad unless they analyze IShares Global's multiple risk-adjusted performance indicators across the competitive landscape. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| META | 1.46 | 0.06 | 0.03 | 0.06 | 1.66 | 2.38 | 13.69 | |||
| MSFT | 1.29 | -0.23 | 0.00 | -0.67 | 0.00 | 2.19 | 13.28 | |||
| UBER | 1.50 | -0.33 | 0.00 | -1.00 | 0.00 | 2.46 | 11.09 | |||
| F | 1.34 | -0.06 | 0.00 | -0.07 | 0.00 | 3.61 | 10.01 | |||
| T | 1.10 | 0.15 | 0.12 | -0.58 | 1.14 | 3.87 | 8.53 | |||
| A | 1.27 | -0.37 | 0.00 | -0.37 | 0.00 | 2.48 | 7.20 | |||
| CRM | 1.83 | -0.27 | 0.00 | -0.37 | 0.00 | 4.03 | 12.37 | |||
| JPM | 1.24 | -0.09 | 0.00 | -0.07 | 0.00 | 2.34 | 8.17 | |||
| MRK | 1.20 | 0.23 | 0.15 | 0.45 | 1.31 | 2.54 | 7.29 | |||
| XOM | 1.32 | 0.36 | 0.25 | 3.95 | 1.16 | 2.90 | 6.83 |
IShares Global Competitive Analysis
The better you understand IShares Global competitors, the higher your chance of making an informed investment decision. From the perspective of an individual investor, IShares Global's competitive analysis can span a broad range of financial and operational metrics.| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
IShares Global Peer Performance Charts
How to Analyze IShares Global Against Peers
IShares Global's peer analysis compares IShares Global with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This helps determine whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:- Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
- Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
- Check valuation dispersion: Review whether IShares Global trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
- Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
- Document the thesis: Record where IShares Global leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.