Financial Services Competition

SFPCXDelisted Fund  USD 0.0041  0.00  0.00%   
The fund is listed under Financial category and is part of Saratoga family. Financial Services competes with Qs Global, Ab Global, Ab Global, Legg Mason, and Artisan Global and other related companies. The peer set adds context for comparison. Peer comparison for Financial Services provides quick context before deeper valuation work.

Financial Services vs Franklin Mutual Correlation Summary

Significant diversification

For the present investment horizon, the measured correlation between SFPCX and TEDIX stands at 0.07, or Significant diversification. The cleaner interpretation is to review correlation beside volatility, expected return, and the role each holding plays in the portfolio.

Moving against Financial Mutual Fund

  0.61RYMEX Commodities Strategy Steady GrowthPairCorr
  0.61RYMJX Commodities Strategy Steady GrowthPairCorr
  0.61RYMBX Commodities Strategy Steady GrowthPairCorr
  0.33TPCIX Timothy Israel Mon Steady GrowthPairCorr
Specify up to 10 symbols:
The concept of mean reversion suggests that Financial Services' price will eventually return toward its long-run average. High prices may deter value investors, while unusually low prices often attract buyers who anticipate a recovery.
Hype
Prediction
LowEstimatedHigh
0.000.010.01
Details
Intrinsic
Valuation
LowRealHigh
0.000.000.00
Details
Bollinger
Band Projection (param)
LowerMiddle BandUpper
2.168.8615.56
Details
Competitive analysis for Financial Services compares its financial performance, valuation multiples, and growth trajectory against sector peers. This peer-relative view often uncovers mispricing that single-company analysis would miss.

Financial Services Competition Correlation Matrix

Correlation analysis between Financial Services Portfolio and its competitors helps investors understand whether diversification is real or only superficial inside the same peer group. This matrix is most informative when investors want to know whether adding another peer would improve diversification, increase crowding, or leave total risk largely unchanged.

Risk-Adjusted Indicators

There is a big difference between Financial Mutual Fund performing well and Financial Services Mutual Fund doing well as a business compared to the competition. There are so many exceptions to the norm that investors cannot definitively determine what's good or bad unless they analyze Financial Services' multiple risk-adjusted performance indicators across the competitive landscape. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.

Financial Services Competitive Analysis

Analyzing Financial Services alongside its competitors can reveal how well the company is executing relative to peers. For longer-term investors, tracking Financial Services' market share trends against competition is a key input for investment decisions.
    
 Better Than Average     
    
 Worse Than Peers    View Performance Chart
SFPCX SMYIX ANAGX CABIX LFLCX APDPX MSTGX TEDIX
 0.00 
0.0041
Financial
 0.60 
28.31
SMYIX
 0.29 
6.96
ANAGX
 0.56 
16.21
CABIX
 0.43 
9.30
Legg
 0.45 
11.11
Artisan
 0.19 
10.45
Morningstar
 1.06 
30.86
Franklin
Market Volatility
(90 Days Market Risk)
Market Performance
(90 Days Performance)
Odds of Financial Distress
(Probability Of Bankruptcy)
Current Valuation
(Equity Enterprise Value)
Buy or Sell Analysis
(Average Analysts Consensus)
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Trade Advice
(90 Days Macroaxis Advice)
Net Asset
Minimum Initial Investment
Price To Book
Five Year Return
One Year Return
Last Dividend Paid
Price To Earning
Price To Sales
Cash Position Weight
Equity Positions Weight
Three Year Return
Annual Yield
Year To Date Return
Bond Positions Weight
Ten Year Return
Day Typical Price
Daily Balance Of Power
Period Momentum Indicator
Rate Of Daily Change
Day Median Price
Price Action Indicator
Relative Strength Index
Coefficient Of Variation
Mean Deviation
Jensen Alpha
Total Risk Alpha
Sortino Ratio
Downside Variance
Standard Deviation
Kurtosis
Potential Upside
Treynor Ratio
Maximum Drawdown
Variance
Market Risk Adjusted Performance
Risk Adjusted Performance
Skewness
Semi Deviation
Information Ratio
Value At Risk
Expected Short fall
Downside Deviation
Semi Variance

Financial Services Peer Performance Charts

How to Analyze Financial Services Against Peers

Financial Services' peer analysis compares Financial Services with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This helps determine whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:
  • Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
  • Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
  • Check valuation dispersion: Review whether Financial Services trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
  • Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
  • Document the thesis: Record where Financial Services leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.
Use this as an educational baseline, then validate conclusions with current filings, market conditions, and portfolio objectives.