Shanghai Fudan Competitors
| SFDMY Stock | USD 49.75 0.00 0.00% |
Correlation: Shanghai Fudan vs Sun Corp Overview
While mean reversion in Shanghai Fudan is a statistically observable tendency, it operates on uncertain timelines. Positions sized too aggressively against the trend can suffer sustained losses before reversion occurs.
Shanghai Fudan Competition Correlation Matrix
Competition correlation for Shanghai Fudan Microelectronics matters because related securities often respond to the same industry, factor, or macro drivers even when their business stories differ. The useful question is whether competitors are behaving like true alternatives or simply tracking the same sector move with different volatility.
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
Surface-level performance for Shanghai Pink Sheet can mask how the business actually stacks up against its competitive set. Risk-adjusted metrics allow investors to compare Shanghai Fudan's efficiency and downside exposure against peers in a more meaningful way. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MYBUF | 4.87 | -1.50 | 0.00 | -0.45 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 133.33 | |||
| TMVWY | 1.85 | -0.28 | 0.00 | -0.57 | 0.00 | 4.20 | 16.60 | |||
| AEXAF | 0.77 | 0.18 | 0.00 | 0.22 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 24.80 | |||
| JPAVF | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||
| KNNNF | 1.00 | -0.42 | 0.00 | -0.36 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 33.38 | |||
| JNPKF | 0.98 | 0.53 | 0.00 | -2.87 | 0.00 | 4.45 | 6.87 | |||
| UBSFF | 4.65 | -0.23 | 0.00 | 6.11 | 0.00 | 12.00 | 39.71 | |||
| SESMF | 1.90 | 0.74 | 0.19 | 9.90 | 1.08 | 8.19 | 16.98 | |||
| JVCZY | 0.25 | 0.12 | 0.00 | -11.18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 8.33 | |||
| SNCPF | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Shanghai Fudan Competitive Analysis
Shanghai Fudan competes directly with Meyer Burger, TeamViewer, and Atos SE, and the financial data points to clear areas of divergence. On scale alone, Shanghai Fudan's 1.27 B valuation and 2.58 B revenue define its weight class. The company converts revenue to profit at a 28.57% rate and delivers 25.56% on shareholder equity. Shanghai Fudan leads on revenue, 2.58 B to 39.9 M, a substantial gap. Net profitability gives Shanghai Fudan an edge at 28.57% versus TeamViewer at 11.95%. On equity returns, Shanghai Fudan earns 25.56% compared to -58.52% at Atos SE.| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
Shanghai Fudan Competition Peer Performance Charts
How to Analyze Shanghai Fudan Against Peers
Shanghai Fudan's peer analysis compares Shanghai Fudan with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This helps determine whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:- Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
- Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
- Check valuation dispersion: Review whether Shanghai Fudan trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
- Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
- Document the thesis: Record where Shanghai Fudan leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.
Peer Comparison Metrics & Methodology
Short interest comparison for Shanghai Fudan and its peers can highlight which companies in the group are attracting the most skepticism from market participants. Relative ranking may help frame which fundamentals deserve deeper follow-up. For peer comparison, Shanghai Fudan has a market cap of 1.27 B, profit margin of 28.57%.
Data shown for Shanghai Fudan Microelectronics is aggregated from periodic company reporting and market reference feeds and normalized across reporting formats. Source publication cadence can introduce delays.