Safe Competition
| SAFE Crypto | USD 0.10 0.0009 0.91% |
Safe vs Wrapped Bitcoin Correlation Summary
Very poor diversification
For the present investment horizon, the measured correlation between SAFE and WBTC stands at 0.87, or Very poor diversification. Safe is a digital instrument, so correlation should still be reviewed with the higher venue and liquidity volatility typical of crypto markets.
Moving together with Safe Crypto Coin
Moving against Safe Crypto Coin
The concept of mean reversion suggests that Safe's price will eventually return toward its long-run average. High prices may deter value investors, while unusually low prices often attract buyers who anticipate a recovery.
Safe Competition Correlation Matrix
Correlation analysis between Safe and its competitors helps investors understand whether diversification is real or only superficial inside the same peer group. This matrix is most informative when investors want to know whether adding another peer would improve diversification, increase crowding, or leave total risk largely unchanged.
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
There is a big difference between Safe Crypto Coin performing well and Safe Cryptocurrency doing well as a business compared to the competition. There are so many exceptions to the norm that investors cannot definitively determine what's good or bad unless they analyze Safe's multiple risk-adjusted performance indicators across the competitive landscape. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XRP | 3.09 | -0.54 | 0.00 | 0.38 | 0.00 | 7.09 | 33.73 | |||
| SOL | 3.37 | -0.61 | 0.00 | 0.88 | 0.00 | 7.19 | 22.11 | |||
| HYPE | 5.05 | 0.37 | 0.06 | -3.12 | 5.72 | 11.58 | 42.72 | |||
| TRX | 1.55 | 0.08 | 0.02 | 0.16 | 1.87 | 3.57 | 9.95 | |||
| STETH | 3.11 | -0.64 | 0.00 | 1.16 | 0.00 | 7.32 | 22.83 | |||
| WBT | 1.97 | -0.15 | 0.00 | 0.16 | 0.00 | 5.75 | 16.74 | |||
| WLFI | 4.71 | -0.43 | 0.00 | 9.07 | 0.00 | 10.00 | 28.72 | |||
| SUI | 4.20 | -0.63 | 0.00 | 0.68 | 0.00 | 12.79 | 32.29 | |||
| LINK | 3.07 | -0.62 | 0.00 | 1.13 | 0.00 | 6.13 | 21.59 | |||
| LEO | 3.17 | 0.05 | 0.01 | -0.06 | 6.43 | 7.91 | 40.60 |
Safe Competitive Analysis
Analyzing Safe alongside its competitors can reveal how well the company is executing relative to peers. For longer-term investors, tracking Safe's market share trends against competition is a key input for investment decisions. Safe's competitive standing becomes clearer when measured alongside XRP, Solana, and Hyperliquid. A 156,510 market capitalization places Safe firmly within this peer set. XRP offers a useful contrast. Safe is dwarfed by XRP on market cap at 58.7 M versus 156,510. Solana offers a useful contrast. Solana holds the larger valuation at 88.76 B versus 156,510. Against Hyperliquid, Safe shows a different profile. Safe dwarfs Hyperliquid on market cap at 156,510 versus 1,004. Ultimately, whether Safe represents the stronger opportunity depends on which metrics investors prioritize and how sustainable the current peer dynamics prove to be.| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
Safe Peer Performance Charts
How to Analyze Safe Against Peers
Safe's peer analysis compares Safe with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This helps determine whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:- Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
- Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
- Check valuation dispersion: Review whether Safe trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
- Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
- Document the thesis: Record where Safe leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.