RiverSource Series Competition
| RCEAX Fund | USD 12.18 0.27 2.27% |
Pair Correlation for RiverSource Series and T ROWE Overview
Weak diversification
The correlation between RiverSource Series and T ROWE is 0.41, which Macroaxis classifies as Weak diversification for the selected horizon. A 0.41 reading means RiverSource Series and T ROWE have partial price overlap, offering some diversification benefit.
Moving together with RiverSource Mutual Fund
Experienced market participants anticipate that RiverSource Series' price will even out over time. Periods when RiverSource Series' deviates significantly from its historical mean may warrant further fundamental analysis.
RiverSource Series Competition Correlation Matrix
Correlation analysis between Riversource Series Trust and its competitors provides context for understanding whether diversification is real or only superficial inside the same peer group. Used correctly, correlation analysis helps separate broad industry exposure from company-specific behavior before additional capital is allocated across the peer group.
| 0.0 | 0.94 | 0.98 | 0.93 | 0.87 | 0.98 | GUIRX | ||
| 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | TIMXX | ||
| 0.94 | 0.0 | 0.94 | 0.92 | 0.83 | 0.95 | NEMUX | ||
| 0.98 | 0.0 | 0.94 | 0.95 | 0.84 | 0.98 | VMLTX | ||
| 0.93 | 0.0 | 0.92 | 0.95 | 0.88 | 0.96 | LCPMX | ||
| 0.87 | 0.0 | 0.83 | 0.84 | 0.88 | 0.88 | DUTMX | ||
| 0.98 | 0.0 | 0.95 | 0.98 | 0.96 | 0.88 | PRFHX | ||
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
Strong recent returns in RiverSource Mutual Fund do not always mean RiverSource Series Mutual Fund is outperforming peers on business quality. Risk-adjusted metrics help compare RiverSource Series' efficiency and downside exposure against peers on a like-for-like basis. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors evaluate volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across different positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GUIRX | 0.10 | -0.01 | 0.17 | -0.44 | 0.16 | 0.20 | 0.99 | |||
| TIMXX | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||
| NEMUX | 0.08 | -0.01 | 0.14 | 3.19 | 0.13 | 0.22 | 0.87 | |||
| VMLTX | 0.06 | 0.00 | 0.25 | -0.37 | 0.05 | 0.09 | 0.73 | |||
| LCPMX | 0.15 | 0.01 | 0.16 | 0.17 | 0.18 | 0.46 | 1.38 | |||
| DUTMX | 0.25 | 0.00 | 0.13 | -0.02 | 0.32 | 0.54 | 1.62 | |||
| PRFHX | 0.14 | 0.00 | 0.16 | -0.05 | 0.20 | 0.27 | 1.27 |
RiverSource Series Competitive Analysis
| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
RiverSource Series Competition Peer Performance Charts
How to Analyze RiverSource Series Against Peers
RiverSource Series' peer analysis compares RiverSource Series with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This helps determine whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:- Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
- Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
- Check valuation dispersion: Review whether RiverSource Series trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
- Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
- Document the thesis: Record where RiverSource Series leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.
Peer Comparison Metrics & Methodology
RiverSource Series has a wider economic moat score than the average competitor, based on return spread and reinvestment patterns. Two companies in the same sector can have very different risk profiles once you look past revenue size. Relative comparison helps show where RiverSource Series is stronger or weaker against peers.
Data shown for Riversource Series Trust is aggregated from fund disclosures and market reference feeds and normalized across reporting formats. Source publication timing can introduce delays.