Invesco NASDAQ Competition
| QQC Etf | CAD 40.33 0.05 0.12% |
Invesco NASDAQ vs Fidelity International Correlation Summary
Average diversification
The correlation between QQC and FCIQ is 0.19, which Macroaxis classifies as Average diversification for the selected horizon. Used correctly, the chart helps investors judge whether adding the second position genuinely diversifies the first.
Moving together with Invesco Etf
| 0.63 | XSP | iShares Core SAMPP | PairCorr |
| 0.84 | ZSP | BMO SAMPP 500 | PairCorr |
| 0.84 | VFV | Vanguard SAMPP 500 | PairCorr |
| 0.85 | HXS | Global X SAMPP | PairCorr |
| 0.84 | XUS | iShares Core SAMPP | PairCorr |
Moving against Invesco Etf
The concept of mean reversion suggests that Invesco NASDAQ's price will eventually return toward its long-run average. High prices may deter value investors, while unusually low prices often attract buyers who anticipate a recovery.
Invesco NASDAQ Competition Correlation Matrix
Correlation analysis between Invesco NASDAQ 100 and its competitors helps investors understand whether diversification is real or only superficial inside the same peer group. This matrix is most informative when investors want to know whether adding another peer would improve diversification, increase crowding, or leave total risk largely unchanged.
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Invesco NASDAQ Competition Risk-Adjusted Indicators
There is a big difference between Invesco Etf performing well and Invesco NASDAQ ETF doing well as a business compared to the competition. There are so many exceptions to the norm that investors cannot definitively determine what's good or bad unless they analyze Invesco NASDAQ's multiple risk-adjusted performance indicators across the competitive landscape. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| META | 1.41 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 1.67 | 2.30 | 13.69 | |||
| MSFT | 1.28 | -0.24 | 0.00 | -0.71 | 0.00 | 2.19 | 13.28 | |||
| UBER | 1.55 | -0.28 | 0.00 | -1.04 | 0.00 | 2.70 | 11.09 | |||
| F | 1.34 | -0.08 | 0.00 | -1.26 | 0.00 | 3.61 | 10.01 | |||
| T | 1.13 | 0.12 | 0.10 | -0.52 | 1.20 | 3.87 | 8.53 | |||
| A | 1.27 | -0.35 | 0.00 | -0.37 | 0.00 | 2.48 | 7.20 | |||
| CRM | 1.78 | -0.33 | 0.00 | -0.44 | 0.00 | 4.03 | 12.37 | |||
| JPM | 1.22 | -0.10 | 0.00 | -0.08 | 0.00 | 2.34 | 8.17 | |||
| MRK | 1.19 | 0.24 | 0.17 | 0.46 | 1.29 | 2.54 | 7.29 | |||
| XOM | 1.34 | 0.41 | 0.28 | 6.84 | 1.14 | 2.90 | 6.83 |
Invesco NASDAQ Competitive Analysis
Analyzing Invesco NASDAQ alongside its competitors can reveal how well the company is executing relative to peers. For longer-term investors, tracking Invesco NASDAQ's market share trends against competition is a key input for investment decisions.| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
Invesco NASDAQ Peer Performance Charts
How to Analyze Invesco NASDAQ Against Peers
Invesco NASDAQ's peer analysis compares Invesco NASDAQ with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This helps determine whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:- Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
- Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
- Check valuation dispersion: Review whether Invesco NASDAQ trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
- Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
- Document the thesis: Record where Invesco NASDAQ leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.