FEDERATED MDT Competition
| QISCX Fund | USD 27.86 -0.09 -0.32% |
FEDERATED MDT vs SCHWAB TARGET Correlation Summary
Poor diversification
For the present investment horizon, the measured correlation between QISCX and SWYEX stands at 0.75, or Poor diversification. The cleaner interpretation is to review correlation beside volatility, expected return, and the role each holding plays in the portfolio.
Moving together with FEDERATED Mutual Fund
The concept of mean reversion suggests that FEDERATED MDT's price will eventually return toward its long-run average. High prices may deter value investors, while unusually low prices often attract buyers who anticipate a recovery.
FEDERATED MDT Competition Correlation Matrix
Correlation analysis between Federated Mdt Small and its competitors helps investors understand whether diversification is real or only superficial inside the same peer group. This matrix is most informative when investors want to know whether adding another peer would improve diversification, increase crowding, or leave total risk largely unchanged.
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
There is a big difference between FEDERATED Mutual Fund performing well and FEDERATED MDT Mutual Fund doing well as a business compared to the competition. There are so many exceptions to the norm that investors cannot definitively determine what's good or bad unless they analyze FEDERATED MDT's multiple risk-adjusted performance indicators across the competitive landscape. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QLSCX | 0.82 | -0.01 | 0.00 | -0.05 | 0.00 | 1.33 | 6.06 | |||
| QASCX | 0.82 | -0.01 | 0.00 | -0.05 | 0.00 | 1.33 | 6.06 | |||
| FSTRX | 0.64 | 0.17 | 0.22 | 0.12 | 0.57 | 1.55 | 7.98 | |||
| FSTLX | 0.64 | 0.17 | 0.22 | 0.12 | 0.56 | 1.61 | 7.96 | |||
| FSTKX | 0.72 | 0.04 | 0.07 | 0.10 | 1.04 | 1.27 | 12.10 | |||
| SINYX | 0.08 | 0.01 | 0.20 | 0.59 | 0.00 | 0.18 | 0.80 | |||
| PXINX | 0.70 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.01 | 1.05 | 1.27 | 4.95 | |||
| RPFFX | 0.88 | 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.03 | 1.12 | 2.16 | 5.69 | |||
| FZAMX | 0.87 | 0.03 | 0.06 | -0.37 | 1.14 | 1.84 | 7.08 | |||
| SWYEX | 0.34 | 0.01 | 0.07 | -0.02 | 0.47 | 0.51 | 2.25 |
FEDERATED MDT Competitive Analysis
| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
Peer Performance Charts
How to Analyze FEDERATED MDT Against Peers
FEDERATED MDT's peer analysis compares FEDERATED MDT with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This helps determine whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:- Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
- Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
- Check valuation dispersion: Review whether FEDERATED MDT trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
- Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
- Document the thesis: Record where FEDERATED MDT leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.