Power Competitors
| PWM Stock | CAD 0.50 -0.02 -3.85% |
Power Metals and Bear Creek Correlation Overview
Pay attention - limited upside
For the present investment horizon, the measured correlation between PWM and BCM stands at -0.92, or Pay attention - limited upside. The cleaner interpretation is to review correlation beside volatility, expected return, and the role each holding plays in the portfolio.
Moving against Power Stock
Mean reversion opportunities in Power Metals' arise when market prices disconnect from fundamental anchors such as earnings, book value, or historical price-to-earnings multiples.
Power Metals Competition Correlation Matrix
Correlation analysis between Power Metals Corp and its competitors helps investors understand whether diversification is real or only superficial inside the same peer group. This matrix is most informative when investors want to know whether adding another peer would improve diversification, increase crowding, or leave total risk largely unchanged.
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
There is a big difference between Power Stock performing well and Power Metals Company doing well as a business compared to the competition. There are so many exceptions to the norm that investors cannot definitively determine what's good or bad unless they analyze Power Metals' multiple risk-adjusted performance indicators across the competitive landscape. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIFT | 6.55 | 0.81 | 0.09 | 0.21 | 7.63 | 15.75 | 39.63 | |||
| CVW | 3.18 | 0.38 | 0.12 | -0.46 | 3.02 | 8.24 | 29.91 | |||
| LRA | 2.48 | 0.50 | 0.15 | 3.71 | 2.65 | 6.25 | 15.66 | |||
| FPX | 3.35 | 0.22 | 0.05 | -5.76 | 3.92 | 8.77 | 27.91 | |||
| FURY | 3.72 | 0.19 | 0.05 | -0.26 | 4.51 | 7.45 | 39.58 | |||
| BMM | 4.45 | 0.11 | 0.03 | 0.23 | 5.26 | 10.00 | 24.32 | |||
| LI | 4.00 | -0.11 | 0.00 | 0.72 | 0.00 | 8.54 | 25.17 | |||
| KLD | 3.19 | 0.40 | 0.11 | -0.34 | 4.06 | 7.54 | 19.45 | |||
| GENM | 4.02 | 0.29 | 0.04 | 0.10 | 5.01 | 9.38 | 25.04 | |||
| BCM | 5.68 | 2.39 | 0.40 | 0.89 | 4.33 | 13.33 | 46.46 |
Power Metals Competitive Analysis
Within its peer group that includes Li FT, CVW CleanTech, and Lara Exploration, Power Metals stands out in several ways. The company commands a 77.9 M market valuation. Power Metals posts a -14.06% return on equity, reflecting current earnings headwinds. Li FT converts shareholder equity more efficiently at -0.51% versus Power Metals at -14.06%. Power Metals is dwarfed by CVW CleanTech on market cap at 136.7 M versus 77.9 M. Return on equity favors Power Metals at -14.06%, well ahead of Lara Exploration at -50.95%.| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
Peer Performance Charts
How to Analyze Power Metals Against Peers
Power Metals' peer analysis compares Power Metals with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This helps determine whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:- Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
- Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
- Check valuation dispersion: Review whether Power Metals trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
- Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
- Document the thesis: Record where Power Metals leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.