Priority Competitors
| PRTH Stock | USD 5.91 0.05 0.85% |
Priority Technology vs Bandwidth Correlation
Poor diversification
The correlation between Priority Technology Holdings and BAND is 0.65 (i.e., Poor diversification) for selected investment horizon. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Priority Technology Holdings and BAND in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed.
Moving together with Priority Stock
Moving against Priority Stock
| 0.61 | IMBBY | Imperial Brands PLC | PairCorr |
| 0.56 | PPERY | Bank Mandiri Persero Earnings Call This Week | PairCorr |
| 0.33 | KB | KB Financial Group | PairCorr |
Sophisticated investors, who have witnessed many market ups and downs, anticipate that the market will even out over time. This tendency of Priority Technology's price to converge to an average value over time is called mean reversion. However, historically, high market prices usually discourage investors that believe in mean reversion to invest, while low prices are viewed as an opportunity to buy.
Priority Technology Competition Correlation Matrix
Typically, diversification allows investors to combine positions across different asset classes to reduce overall portfolio risk. Correlation between Priority Technology and its competitors represents the degree of relationship between the price movements of corresponding stocks. A correlation of about +1.0 implies that the price of Priority and its corresponding peer move in tandem. A correlation of -1.0 means that prices move in opposite directions. A correlation of close to zero suggests that the price movements of assets are uncorrelated; in other words, the historical price movement of Priority Technology does not affect the price movement of the other competitor.
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
There is a big difference between Priority Stock performing well and Priority Technology Company doing well as a business compared to the competition. There are so many exceptions to the norm that investors cannot definitively determine what's good or bad unless they analyze Priority Technology's multiple risk-adjusted performance indicators across the competitive landscape. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCSI | 2.14 | (0.41) | 0.00 | (0.14) | 0.00 | 3.56 | 20.98 | |||
| DAVA | 2.79 | (0.28) | 0.00 | 1.34 | 0.00 | 5.08 | 34.91 | |||
| BLZE | 2.71 | (1.21) | 0.00 | (0.41) | 0.00 | 3.85 | 36.91 | |||
| CINT | 2.11 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.07 | 2.72 | 5.51 | 12.99 | |||
| DJCO | 2.83 | 0.44 | 0.11 | 0.36 | 3.80 | 7.60 | 21.24 | |||
| ARQQ | 4.50 | (0.87) | 0.00 | (0.18) | 0.00 | 9.43 | 24.25 | |||
| OSPN | 2.15 | (0.43) | 0.00 | (0.36) | 0.00 | 3.47 | 28.76 | |||
| CLMB | 1.98 | (0.17) | 0.00 | (0.08) | 0.00 | 4.28 | 13.98 | |||
| DOMO | 3.08 | (1.20) | 0.00 | (0.37) | 0.00 | 5.02 | 28.62 | |||
| BAND | 1.72 | (0.27) | 0.00 | (0.25) | 0.00 | 3.66 | 12.36 |
Cross Equities Net Income Analysis
Compare Priority Technology and related stocks such as Consensus Cloud Solutions, Endava, and Backblaze Net Income Over Time
Select Fundamental| 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCSI | 152.1 M | 152.1 M | 152.1 M | 152.1 M | 152.1 M | 152.1 M | 152.1 M | 152.1 M | 152.1 M | 213 M | 152.9 M | 109 M | 72.7 M | 77.2 M | 89.4 M | 80.5 M | 99 M |
| DAVA | 4.7 M | 4.7 M | 4.7 M | 8.1 M | 13.5 M | 16.7 M | 16.8 M | 19 M | 24 M | 20 M | 43.5 M | 83.1 M | 94.2 M | 17.1 M | 21.2 M | 24.4 M | 32.3 M |
| BLZE | (996 K) | (996 K) | (996 K) | (996 K) | (996 K) | (996 K) | (996 K) | (996 K) | (996 K) | (996 K) | (6.6 M) | (21.7 M) | (51.4 M) | (59.7 M) | (48.5 M) | (43.7 M) | (45.9 M) |
| CINT | 2.7 M | 2.7 M | 2.7 M | 4.6 M | 28.1 M | 28.1 M | 17.1 M | 28.9 M | 59.4 M | 56.5 M | 127.7 M | 22.6 M | 18.7 M | 132.6 M | 29.5 M | 33.9 M | 48.4 M |
| DJCO | 900 K | 5.5 M | 3.8 M | 631 K | 810 K | (1 M) | (918 K) | 8.2 M | (25.2 M) | 4 M | 112.9 M | (75.6 M) | 21.5 M | 78.1 M | 112.1 M | 129 M | 135.4 M |
| ARQQ | 1 M | 1 M | 1 M | 1 M | 1 M | 1 M | 1 M | 1 M | 1 M | (568 K) | (271.7 M) | 65.1 M | (70.4 M) | (54.6 M) | (35.3 M) | (31.8 M) | (33.4 M) |
| OSPN | (5.9 M) | 18.1 M | 15.6 M | 11.1 M | 33.5 M | 42.2 M | 10.5 M | (22.4 M) | 3.8 M | 7.9 M | (5.5 M) | (30.6 M) | (14.4 M) | (29.8 M) | 57.1 M | 65.6 M | 68.9 M |
| CLMB | 1.1 M | 5.5 M | 5.5 M | 6.4 M | 5.8 M | 5.8 M | 5.9 M | 5.1 M | 3.5 M | 6.8 M | 4.5 M | 9.2 M | 12.2 M | 12.3 M | 18.6 M | 21.4 M | 22.5 M |
| DOMO | (183.1 M) | (183.1 M) | (183.1 M) | (183.1 M) | (183.1 M) | (183.1 M) | (183.1 M) | (176.6 M) | (154.3 M) | (125.7 M) | (84.6 M) | (102.1 M) | (105.6 M) | (75.6 M) | (81.9 M) | (94.2 M) | (98.9 M) |
| BAND | (6.7 M) | (6.7 M) | (6.7 M) | (6.7 M) | (6.7 M) | (6.7 M) | 22.4 M | 6 M | 17.9 M | 2.5 M | (44 M) | (27.4 M) | 19.6 M | (16.3 M) | (6.5 M) | (5.9 M) | (5.6 M) |
Priority Technology and related stocks such as Consensus Cloud Solutions, Endava, and Backblaze Net Income description
Net income is one of the most important fundamental items in finance. It plays a large role in Priority Technology financial statement analysis. It represents the amount of money remaining after all of Priority Technology Holdings operating expenses, interest, taxes and preferred stock dividends have been deducted from a company total revenue.Priority Technology Competitive Analysis
The better you understand Priority Technology competitors, the better chance you have of utilizing it as a position in your portfolios. From an individual investor's perspective, Priority Technology's competitive analysis can cover a whole range of metrics. Some of these will be more critical depending on who you are as an investor and how you react to market volatility. However, if you are locking your investment sandscape to a long-term horizon, comparing the fundamental indicator across Priority Technology's competition over several years is one of the best ways to analyze its investment potential.| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
Priority Technology Competition Performance Charts
Five steps to successful analysis of Priority Technology Competition
Priority Technology's competitive analysis is the process of researching and evaluating its competitive landscape. It provides an understanding of the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) faced by Priority Technology in relation to its competition. Priority Technology's competition analysis typically involves several steps, including:- Identifying the key players in the market: This involves identifying the major competitors of Priority Technology in the market, both direct and indirect, as well as new entrants and disruptive technologies.
- Assessing the strengths and weaknesses of each competitor: This involves evaluating each competitor's strengths and weaknesses in areas such as product offerings, market share, brand recognition, financial performance, and distribution channels.
- Understanding the competitive environment: This involves evaluating the regulatory environment, economic conditions, and other factors that may impact Priority Technology's competitive landscape.
- Identifying opportunities and threats: This involves using the information gathered during the analysis to identify opportunities and threats to Priority Technology, and developing a strategy to address them.
- Evaluating the competitive landscape: This involves understanding the competitive dynamics of the market, such as pricing, marketing, and distribution strategies, as well as analyzing the competitive advantage of each competitor.
Complement your Priority Technology position
In addition to having Priority Technology in your portfolios, you can quickly add positions using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your very unique investing style. A single investing idea is a collection of funds, stocks, ETFs, or cryptocurrencies that are programmatically selected from a pull of investment themes. After you determine your investment opportunity, you can then find an optimal portfolio that will maximize potential returns on the chosen idea or minimize its exposure to market volatility.Did You Try This Idea?
Run Momentum Thematic Idea Now
Momentum
Large corporations operating in software, education, financial and car manufacturing industries. The Momentum theme has 31 constituents at this time.
You can either use a buy-and-hold strategy to lock in the entire theme or actively trade it to take advantage of the short-term price volatility of individual constituents. Macroaxis can help you discover thousands of investment opportunities in different asset classes. In addition, you can partner with us for reliable portfolio optimization as you plan to utilize Momentum Theme or any other thematic opportunities.
| View All Next | Launch |
Check out Priority Technology Correlation with its peers. You can also try the Bond Analysis module to evaluate and analyze corporate bonds as a potential investment for your portfolios..
Is there potential for Transaction & Payment Processing Services market expansion? Will Priority introduce new products? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Priority Technology. Anticipated expansion of Priority directly elevates investor willingness to pay premium valuations. Understanding fair value requires weighing current performance against future potential. All the valuation information about Priority Technology listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth 3.857 | Earnings Share 0.53 | Revenue Per Share | Quarterly Revenue Growth 0.063 | Return On Assets |
The market value of Priority Technology is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Priority that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Priority Technology's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Priority Technology's true underlying value. Analysts utilize numerous techniques to assess fundamental value, seeking to purchase shares when trading prices fall beneath estimated intrinsic worth. Because Priority Technology's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Priority Technology's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
It's important to distinguish between Priority Technology's intrinsic value and market price, which are calculated using different methodologies. Investment decisions regarding Priority Technology should consider multiple factors including financial performance, growth metrics, competitive position, and professional analysis. Meanwhile, Priority Technology's quoted price indicates the marketplace figure where supply meets demand through bilateral consent.