Purecycle Competitors

PCT Stock  USD 5.76  0.08  1.41%   
The company is classified under the Chemicals sector. Purecycle Technologies competes with CECO Environmental, Triton International, Enovis Corp, CompoSecure, and DXP Enterprises and other related companies. The peer set adds context for comparison. Use this module to test if Purecycle Technologies has durable advantages versus sector peers.

Purecycle Technologies vs BW LPG Correlation Summary

Very good diversification

The correlation between PCT and BWLP is -0.36, which Macroaxis classifies as Very good diversification for the selected horizon. Used correctly, the chart helps investors judge whether adding the second position genuinely diversifies the first.

Moving together with Purecycle Stock

  0.69X2Z SKOTAN SA ZYPairCorr
  0.72BANB Bachem Holding AGPairCorr

Moving against Purecycle Stock

  0.55BRD BRASKEM PFD ADR2PairCorr
  0.54G3V Green PlainsPairCorr
  0.49DIK Denka LimitedPairCorr
  0.48NPX NIPPON SANSO HOLDINGSPairCorr
  0.34NP7 Nippon KayakuPairCorr
Specify up to 10 symbols:
The concept of mean reversion suggests that Purecycle Technologies' price will eventually return toward its long-run average. High prices may deter value investors, while unusually low prices often attract buyers who anticipate a recovery.
Hype
Prediction
LowEstimatedHigh
0.085.7611.44
Details
Intrinsic
Valuation
LowRealHigh
0.025.7011.38
Details
Naive
Forecast
LowNextHigh
0.105.1710.84
Details
Bollinger
Band Projection (param)
LowerMiddle BandUpper
4.607.5510.50
Details
Competitive analysis for Purecycle Technologies compares its financial performance, valuation multiples, and growth trajectory against sector peers. This peer-relative view often uncovers mispricing that single-company analysis would miss.

Purecycle Technologies Competition Correlation Matrix

Correlation analysis between Purecycle Technologies Holdings and its competitors helps investors understand whether diversification is real or only superficial inside the same peer group. This matrix is most informative when investors want to know whether adding another peer would improve diversification, increase crowding, or leave total risk largely unchanged.

High positive correlations

BWLPDXPE
PSIXCECO
BWLPZIM
CMPOCECO
DXPECMPO
ZIMDXPE
  

High negative correlations

BWLPUPWK
CMPOENOV
DXPEENOV
ARLOCECO
ARLOPSIX
ENOVCECO

Risk-Adjusted Indicators

There is a big difference between Purecycle Stock performing well and Purecycle Technologies Company doing well as a business compared to the competition. There are so many exceptions to the norm that investors cannot definitively determine what's good or bad unless they analyze Purecycle Technologies' multiple risk-adjusted performance indicators across the competitive landscape. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.

Purecycle Technologies Competitive Analysis

Purecycle Technologies' competitive standing becomes clearer when measured alongside CECO Environmental, Triton International, and Enovis Corp. With 8.4 M in revenue and a 1.01 B market value, Purecycle Technologies anchors one end of the peer spectrum. Purecycle Technologies posts a -68.76% return on equity, reflecting current earnings headwinds. Top-line revenue favors CECO Environmental by a wide margin: 774.4 M to 8.4 M. Purecycle Technologies commands the larger valuation at 1.01 B versus 195,050. Enovis Corp leads with -58.27% return on equity versus -68.76% for Purecycle Technologies.
    
 Better Than Average     
    
 Worse Than Peers    View Performance Chart
PCT CECO TRTN-PC ENOV CMPO DXPE ZIM PSIX UPWK ARLO
 1.41 
5.76
Purecycle
 0.39 
54.50
CECO
 0.16 
24.70
Triton
 1.71 
22.99
Enovis
 0.35 
19.74
CompoSecure
 0.37 
130.46
DXP
 0.77 
26.99
ZIM
 6.32 
56.74
Power
 2.95 
12.21
Upwork
 0.67 
13.60
Arlo
Market Volatility
(90 Days Market Risk)
Market Performance
(90 Days Performance)
Odds of Financial Distress
(Probability Of Bankruptcy)
Current Valuation
(Equity Enterprise Value)
Buy or Sell Analysis
(Average Analysts Consensus)
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Trade Advice
(90 Days Macroaxis Advice)
Current Ratio
Net Asset
Profit Margin
EBITDA
Operating Margin
Current Valuation
Price To Book
Retained Earnings
Current Asset
Beta
Number Of Employees
Shares Outstanding
Cash Flow From Operations
Annual Yield
Total Debt
Return On Equity
Return On Asset
Number Of Shares Shorted
Book Value Per Share
Current Liabilities
Total Asset
Debt To Equity
Short Ratio
Target Price
Last Dividend Paid
Shares Owned By Institutions
Market Capitalization
Price To Earning
Price To Earnings To Growth
Price To Sales
Net Income
Earnings Per Share
Shares Owned By Insiders
Revenue
Working Capital
Cash And Equivalents
Cash Per Share
Gross Profit
Day Typical Price
Accumulation Distribution
Market Facilitation Index
Daily Balance Of Power
Period Momentum Indicator
Rate Of Daily Change
Day Median Price
Price Action Indicator
Relative Strength Index
Coefficient Of Variation
Mean Deviation
Jensen Alpha
Total Risk Alpha
Sortino Ratio
Downside Variance
Standard Deviation
Kurtosis
Potential Upside
Treynor Ratio
Maximum Drawdown
Variance
Market Risk Adjusted Performance
Risk Adjusted Performance
Skewness
Semi Deviation
Information Ratio
Value At Risk
Expected Short fall
Downside Deviation
Semi Variance

Peer Performance Charts

How to Analyze Purecycle Technologies Against Peers

Purecycle Technologies' peer analysis compares Purecycle Technologies with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This helps determine whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:
  • Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
  • Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
  • Check valuation dispersion: Review whether Purecycle Technologies trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
  • Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
  • Document the thesis: Record where Purecycle Technologies leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.
Use this as an educational baseline, then validate conclusions with current filings, market conditions, and portfolio objectives.