Oppenheimer International Competition
| OIDAX Fund | USD 12.97 -0.30 -2.26% |
Pair Correlation for Oppenheimer International and AB SMALL Details
Poor diversification
For the present investment horizon, the measured correlation between Oppenheimer International and AB SMALL stands at 0.77, or Poor diversification. Lower overlap tends to improve diversification, while higher overlap means both positions carry similar risk.
Moving together with Oppenheimer Mutual Fund
Experienced market participants anticipate that Oppenheimer International's price will even out over time. Periods when Oppenheimer International's deviates significantly from its historical mean may warrant further fundamental analysis.
Oppenheimer International Competition Correlation Matrix
Competition correlation for Oppenheimer International Diversified matters because related securities often respond to the same industry, factor, or macro drivers even when their business stories differ. Used correctly, correlation analysis helps separate broad industry exposure from company-specific behavior before additional capital is allocated across the peer group.
| 0.98 | 0.93 | 0.91 | 0.83 | 0.92 | VVSCX | ||
| 0.98 | 0.95 | 0.93 | 0.88 | 0.94 | VISVX | ||
| 0.93 | 0.95 | 0.99 | 0.96 | 0.99 | AVPAX | ||
| 0.91 | 0.93 | 0.99 | 0.97 | 0.99 | AVCNX | ||
| 0.83 | 0.88 | 0.96 | 0.97 | 0.97 | QRSAX | ||
| 0.92 | 0.94 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.97 | SCYVX | ||
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
Strong recent returns in Oppenheimer Mutual Fund do not always mean Oppenheimer International Mutual Fund is outperforming peers on business quality. Risk-adjusted metrics help compare Oppenheimer International's efficiency and downside exposure against peers on a like-for-like basis. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors evaluate volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across different positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VVSCX | 0.91 | 0.11 | 0.08 | 0.02 | 1.21 | 1.41 | 5.32 | |||
| VISVX | 0.76 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.02 | 0.96 | 1.38 | 4.40 | |||
| AVPAX | 0.88 | 0.17 | 0.13 | 0.07 | 1.11 | 1.74 | 5.39 | |||
| AVCNX | 0.88 | 0.17 | 0.15 | 0.08 | 1.00 | 1.79 | 5.40 | |||
| QRSAX | 0.70 | 0.12 | 0.14 | 0.06 | 0.82 | 1.42 | 4.18 | |||
| SCYVX | 0.82 | 0.16 | 0.15 | 0.07 | 0.98 | 2.06 | 5.30 |
Oppenheimer International Competitive Analysis
| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
Oppenheimer International Competition Peer Performance Charts
How to Analyze Oppenheimer International Against Peers
Oppenheimer International's peer analysis compares Oppenheimer International with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This helps determine whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:- Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
- Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
- Check valuation dispersion: Review whether Oppenheimer International trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
- Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
- Document the thesis: Record where Oppenheimer International leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.
Peer Comparison Metrics & Methodology
Oppenheimer International has a wider economic moat score than the average competitor, based on return spread and reinvestment patterns. The dataset reflects available inputs without directional implication. Relative comparison helps show where Oppenheimer International is stronger or weaker against peers.
Data shown for Oppenheimer International Diversified is aggregated from fund disclosures and market reference feeds and normalized across reporting formats. Source publication timing can introduce delays.