NGEx Competitors
| NGEX Stock | 24.87 -0.80 -3.12% |
NGEx Minerals and Torex Gold Correlation Snapshot
Weak diversification
The correlation between NGEX and TXG is 0.36, which Macroaxis classifies as Weak diversification for the selected horizon. The overlap area represents the portion of risk that may be diversified away when both instruments are held together and nothing else in the portfolio changes.
Moving together with NGEx Stock
| 0.9 | TECK-B | Teck Resources | PairCorr |
| 0.7 | SKE | Skeena Resources | PairCorr |
| 0.83 | FOM | Foran Mining Earnings Call This Week | PairCorr |
Moving against NGEx Stock
Investors who believe in mean reversion view NGEx Minerals' price extremes not as permanent states but as temporary dislocations that create opportunities for disciplined, contrarian capital allocation.
NGEx Minerals Competition Correlation Matrix
Correlation analysis between NGEx Minerals and its competitors helps investors understand whether diversification is real or only superficial inside the same peer group. This matrix is most informative when investors want to know whether adding another peer would improve diversification, increase crowding, or leave total risk largely unchanged.
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
There is a big difference between NGEx Stock performing well and NGEx Minerals Company doing well as a business compared to the competition. There are so many exceptions to the norm that investors cannot definitively determine what's good or bad unless they analyze NGEx Minerals' multiple risk-adjusted performance indicators across the competitive landscape. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NG | 3.93 | 0.36 | 0.06 | 0.13 | 5.54 | 7.96 | 31.36 | |||
| USA | 4.68 | 1.00 | 0.15 | 0.28 | 5.46 | 8.70 | 32.50 | |||
| ERD | 2.97 | 0.09 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 3.84 | 6.02 | 25.72 | |||
| KNT | 2.20 | 0.35 | 0.10 | -1.00 | 3.61 | 4.61 | 16.04 | |||
| OLA | 3.18 | 0.61 | 0.12 | 0.40 | 4.54 | 6.38 | 24.24 | |||
| WGX | 2.64 | 0.26 | 0.06 | 0.14 | 3.53 | 4.86 | 15.62 | |||
| SJ | 1.16 | 0.23 | 0.18 | 0.33 | 1.16 | 3.10 | 7.82 | |||
| DSV | 3.73 | 0.32 | 0.08 | -0.23 | 5.14 | 7.98 | 26.75 | |||
| TXG | 3.11 | 0.32 | 0.05 | 0.14 | 4.97 | 5.94 | 18.98 |
NGEx Minerals Competitive Analysis
Sizing up NGEx Minerals against NovaGold Resources, Americas Silver, and Erdene Resource reveals meaningful differences in scale and efficiency. At a 5.38 B valuation, NGEx Minerals is a significant player in the space. NGEx Minerals posts a -124.43% return on equity, reflecting current earnings headwinds. NGEx Minerals leads with -124.43% return on equity versus -162.68% for NovaGold Resources. Market capitalization diverges sharply here: 5.38 B versus 3.26 B, giving NGEx Minerals a clear size advantage. Market capitalization diverges sharply here: 5.38 B versus 454.7 M, giving NGEx Minerals a clear size advantage.| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
Peer Performance Charts
How to Analyze NGEx Minerals Against Peers
NGEx Minerals' peer analysis compares NGEx Minerals with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This helps determine whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:- Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
- Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
- Check valuation dispersion: Review whether NGEx Minerals trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
- Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
- Document the thesis: Record where NGEx Minerals leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.