Microvast Holdings Competitors
| MVSTW Stock | USD 0.02 -0.01 -34.29% |
Correlation: Microvast Holdings vs Eastern Summary
Very good diversification
For the present investment horizon, the measured correlation between MVSTW and EML stands at -0.35, or Very good diversification. In portfolio terms, the overlap visualization shows how much shared movement remains after both positions are combined.
Moving against Microvast Stock
The degree to which Microvast Holdings' exhibits mean reversion depends on how efficiently the market prices new information. In highly covered equities, the mean reversion window tends to be shorter.
Microvast Holdings Competition Correlation Matrix
Studying peer correlation around Microvast Holdings gives investors a cleaner read on how much independent price behavior still exists across the competitive set. The business currently sits in the Industrials sector and the Electrical Equipment & Parts industry. In practical terms, lower correlation may offer better diversification while higher correlation may leave the portfolio more exposed to one shared driver.
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
Strong stock returns do not always mean Microvast Holdings Company is outperforming its peers on a fundamental level. There are so many exceptions to the norm that investors cannot definitively determine what's good or bad unless they analyze Microvast Holdings' multiple risk-adjusted performance indicators across the competitive landscape. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SKYX | 3.95 | 0.04 | 0.00 | -0.09 | 0.00 | 9.09 | 33.38 | |||
| ULBI | 2.75 | 0.29 | 0.09 | 0.18 | 2.91 | 7.02 | 19.06 | |||
| DFLI | 6.15 | -1.21 | 0.00 | -0.58 | 0.00 | 8.73 | 47.98 | |||
| PEW | 2.31 | 0.12 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 3.10 | 4.61 | 29.97 | |||
| CBAT | 1.86 | -0.02 | 0.00 | -0.12 | 0.00 | 3.57 | 24.81 | |||
| RGP | 2.17 | -0.40 | 0.00 | -0.50 | 0.00 | 3.36 | 17.49 | |||
| SDST | 3.68 | -0.16 | 0.00 | -0.17 | 0.00 | 7.14 | 28.23 | |||
| VOLT | 1.06 | 0.31 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 1.06 | 2.34 | 6.68 | |||
| ESP | 2.86 | 0.41 | 0.11 | 0.50 | 3.68 | 6.71 | 19.23 | |||
| EML | 1.70 | 0.15 | 0.09 | 0.13 | 1.88 | 3.62 | 10.51 |
Microvast Holdings Competitive Analysis
Placing Microvast Holdings next to SKYX Platforms, Ultralife, and Dragonfly Energy puts raw numbers into competitive context. Profitability is a concern, with a -6.83% net margin and -7.32% return on equity signaling pressure on earnings. Microvast Holdings converts shareholder equity more efficiently at -7.32% versus SKYX Platforms at -1421.39%. Revenue tilts toward Microvast Holdings at 427.5 M compared with 191.2 M. On the bottom line, Microvast Holdings retains -6.83% while Dragonfly Energy manages -118.34%.| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
Microvast Holdings Competition Peer Performance Charts
How to Analyze Microvast Holdings Against Peers
Microvast Holdings' peer analysis compares Microvast Holdings with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This helps determine whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:- Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
- Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
- Check valuation dispersion: Review whether Microvast Holdings trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
- Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
- Document the thesis: Record where Microvast Holdings leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.
Peer Comparison Metrics & Methodology
Peer analysis for Microvast Holdings uses the most recent available fundamentals rather than static annual comparisons, improving relevance as conditions evolve. EPS growth trajectory comparison for Microvast Holdings versus peers focuses on structural earnings expansion rather than single-quarter surprises. Income sustainability for Microvast Holdings looks different when placed in context against peer group payout and retention trends. The data shown is informational and should not be interpreted as guidance. Competition analysis adds context to price action by grounding it in relative fundamentals. For peer comparison, Microvast Holdings has profit margin of -6.83%.
Unless otherwise specified, data for Microvast Holdings is compiled from periodic company reporting and market reference feeds and standardized for comparability. Updates may occur throughout the day.