M3 Competitors
| MTHRF Stock | USD 11.00 1.10 11.11% |
M3 and Shanghai Fosun Correlation View
Moving together with M3 Pink Sheet
Moving against M3 Pink Sheet
Experienced M3's investors use mean reversion as a complement to momentum analysis: momentum identifies the trend; mean reversion identifies when that trend has extended beyond sustainable levels.
M3 Competition Correlation Matrix
Correlation analysis between M3 Inc and its competitors helps investors understand whether diversification is real or only superficial inside the same peer group. A reading near +1 usually means prices have moved in tandem, a reading near -1 suggests opposite movement, and a reading near zero points to weaker historical dependence.
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
Surface-level performance for M3 Pink Sheet can mask how the business actually stacks up against its competitive set. Without reviewing risk-adjusted indicators, investors may overweight recent returns and underweight the volatility required to achieve them. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BDUUF | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||
| GIFLF | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||
| BDULF | 0.40 | 0.13 | 0.00 | 1.07 | 0.00 | 1.59 | 7.99 | |||
| SSMXF | 0.78 | -0.19 | 0.00 | 0.35 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 17.33 | |||
| SHPMF | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||
| ESALF | 1.60 | 0.11 | 0.02 | 0.36 | 2.67 | 5.56 | 35.89 | |||
| RCDTF | 0.41 | -0.24 | 0.00 | 0.23 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 12.97 | |||
| ESAIY | 1.55 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 1.83 | 2.59 | 13.81 | |||
| WILLF | 0.95 | -0.16 | 0.00 | 34.30 | 0.00 | 2.50 | 21.03 | |||
| SFOSF | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
M3 Competitive Analysis
Among Bangkok Dusit, Grifols SA, and Bangkok Dusit and M3, each company brings a distinct financial profile to the table. M3 contributes 208.16 B in revenue from a 18.43 B base. Shareholders see a 17.97% return on equity, supported by a 20.49% profit margin. Top-line revenue favors M3 by a wide margin: 208.16 B to 74.45 B. Profit margins tilt toward M3 at 20.49% against Grifols SA at 1.15%. M3 dwarfs Bangkok Dusit on market cap at 18.43 B versus 13.53 B.| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
M3 Competition Peer Performance Charts
How to Analyze M3 Against Peers
M3's peer analysis compares M3 with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This helps determine whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:- Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
- Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
- Check valuation dispersion: Review whether M3 trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
- Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
- Document the thesis: Record where M3 leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.
Peer Comparison Metrics & Methodology
The competition view for M3 includes correlation data, so you can see not only which peers are financially similar but also which ones move together in the market. Comparing operational quality across peers can be more informative than reading one company in isolation. For peer comparison, M3 has a market cap of 18.43 B, P/E of 58.38, profit margin of 20.49%.
Macroaxis compiles M3 Inc metrics from periodic company reporting and market reference feeds and applies consistent transformation rules before display. Not all fields update in real time.