LITMAN GREGORY Competition

MSILX Fund  USD 21.45  -0.20  -0.92%   
The fund is listed under the Foreign Large Blend category and is part of the iM Global Partner Fund Management family. Litman Gregory Masters is often compared with IMGP SBH, LITMAN GREGORY, LITMAN GREGORY, and IM Dolan and additional peers. This peer view supports relative benchmarking. Peer comparison for LITMAN GREGORY provides quick context before deeper valuation work.

Correlation: LITMAN GREGORY vs IM Dolan View

Poor diversification

For the present investment horizon, the measured correlation between MSILX and IDMIX stands at 0.62, or Poor diversification. The cleaner interpretation is to review correlation beside volatility, expected return, and the role each holding plays in the portfolio.

Moving together with LITMAN Mutual Fund

  0.9PFSVX Imgp Sbh FocusedPairCorr
  0.76MAHIX Litman Gregory MastersPairCorr
  0.62MSEFX Litman Gregory MastersPairCorr
  0.62IDMIX Im Dolan MceniryPairCorr
Specify up to 10 symbols:
The mean reversion effect in LITMAN GREGORY is stronger when the initial deviation was driven by sentiment rather than fundamental change. Identifying the root cause of LITMAN GREGORY's price dislocation is essential before acting.
Hype
Prediction
LowEstimatedHigh
20.5721.4622.35
Details
Intrinsic
Valuation
LowRealHigh
20.8321.7222.61
Details
Naive
Forecast
LowNextHigh
20.0820.9621.85
Details
Bollinger
Band Projection (param)
LowerMiddle BandUpper
21.8122.9424.07
Details
Competitive positioning is a critical dimension of LITMAN GREGORY analysis. Understanding where Litman Gregory Masters stands relative to its peers on returns, growth, and valuation helps investors assess whether its advantage is sustainable.

LITMAN GREGORY Competition Correlation Matrix

Correlation analysis between Litman Gregory Masters and its competitors helps investors understand whether diversification is real or only superficial inside the same peer group. This matrix is most informative when investors want to know whether adding another peer would improve diversification, increase crowding, or leave total risk largely unchanged.

Risk-Adjusted Indicators

There is a big difference between LITMAN Mutual Fund performing well and LITMAN GREGORY Mutual Fund doing well as a business compared to the competition. There are so many exceptions to the norm that investors cannot definitively determine what's good or bad unless they analyze LITMAN GREGORY's multiple risk-adjusted performance indicators across the competitive landscape. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.

LITMAN GREGORY Competitive Analysis

    
 Better Than Average     
    
 Worse Than Peers    View Performance Chart
MSILX PFSVX MAHIX MSEFX IDMIX
 0.92 
21.45
LITMAN
 0.30 
13.47
IMGP
 0.10 
9.79
LITMAN
 0.79 
11.35
LITMAN
 0.20 
9.91
IDMIX
Market Volatility
(90 Days Market Risk)
Market Performance
(90 Days Performance)
Odds of Financial Distress
(Probability Of Bankruptcy)
Current Valuation
(Equity Enterprise Value)
Buy or Sell Analysis
(Average Analysts Consensus)
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Trade Advice
(90 Days Macroaxis Advice)
Net Asset
Minimum Initial Investment
Price To Book
Five Year Return
One Year Return
Last Dividend Paid
Price To Earning
Price To Sales
Cash Position Weight
Equity Positions Weight
Three Year Return
Annual Yield
Year To Date Return
Bond Positions Weight
Ten Year Return
Day Typical Price
Period Momentum Indicator
Rate Of Daily Change
Day Median Price
Price Action Indicator
Coefficient Of Variation
Mean Deviation
Jensen Alpha
Total Risk Alpha
Sortino Ratio
Downside Variance
Standard Deviation
Kurtosis
Potential Upside
Treynor Ratio
Maximum Drawdown
Variance
Market Risk Adjusted Performance
Risk Adjusted Performance
Skewness
Semi Deviation
Information Ratio
Value At Risk
Expected Short fall
Downside Deviation
Semi Variance

Peer Performance Charts

How to Analyze LITMAN GREGORY Against Peers

LITMAN GREGORY's peer analysis compares LITMAN GREGORY with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This helps determine whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:
  • Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
  • Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
  • Check valuation dispersion: Review whether LITMAN GREGORY trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
  • Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
  • Document the thesis: Record where LITMAN GREGORY leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.
Use this as an educational baseline, then validate conclusions with current filings, market conditions, and portfolio objectives.