Mountain Province Competitors

MPVDF Stock  USD 0.04  -0.01  -20.00%   
The company classifies itself in the Other Precious Metals & Mining industry (Basic Materials sector). Comparable companies for Mountain Province Diamonds include Clifton Mining, X-Terra Resources, Tsodilo Resources, and Magellan Gold and related peers. This context supports benchmarking against similarly positioned firms. The figures reflect publicly disclosed earnings, balance sheet, and cash flow data. The information is analytical in nature and is not intended as a specific recommendation. This module contrasts Mountain Province with competitors to reveal risk-adjusted gaps. This screen separates narrative from data by ranking Mountain Province against peer metrics. The peer view highlights how Mountain Province measures up across multiple dimensions. This view summarizes available data without implying outcomes.

Pair Correlation for Mountain Province and GGL Resources Summary

Moving together with Mountain Pink Sheet

  0.83BVN Compania de MinasPairCorr

Moving against Mountain Pink Sheet

  0.64PBCRF PT Bank CentralPairCorr
  0.54PBCRY Bank Central AsiaPairCorr
Specify up to 10 symbols:
The concept of mean reversion suggests that Mountain Province's price will eventually return toward its long-run average. High prices may deter value investors, while unusually low prices often attract buyers who anticipate a recovery.
Hype
Prediction
LowEstimatedHigh
0.000.047.18
Details
Intrinsic
Valuation
LowRealHigh
0.000.037.17
Details
Naive
Forecast
LowNextHigh
0.00080.047.18
Details
Bollinger
Band Projection (param)
LowerMiddle BandUpper
0.040.050.07
Details
Competitive analysis for Mountain Province compares its financial performance, valuation multiples, and growth trajectory against sector peers. This peer-relative view often uncovers mispricing that single-company analysis would miss.

Mountain Province Competition Correlation Matrix

Studying peer correlation around Mountain Province Diamonds gives investors a cleaner read on how much independent price behavior still exists across the competitive set. The business currently sits in the Basic Materials sector and the Other Precious Metals & Mining industry. In practical terms, lower correlation may offer better diversification while higher correlation may leave the portfolio more exposed to one shared driver.

High positive correlations

TSDRFCFTN
XTRRFCFTN
TSDRFXTRRF
XTRRFNBRI
MAGETSDRF
CFTNNBRI
  

High negative correlations

GGLXFHWKDF
TSDRFCOSRF
COSRFCFTN
MAGECOSRF
COSRFNBRI
COSRFXTRRF

Risk-Adjusted Indicators

Evaluating Mountain Pink Sheet requires separating price momentum from underlying business quality relative to competitors. Without reviewing risk-adjusted indicators, investors may overweight recent returns and underweight the volatility required to achieve them. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.

Mountain Province Competitive Analysis

Mountain Province's competitive standing becomes clearer when measured alongside Hawkeye Gold, North Bay, and Clifton Mining. With 308.7 M in revenue and a 84.4 M market value, Mountain Province anchors one end of the peer spectrum. Shareholders see a 109.89% return on equity, supported by a 73.45% profit margin. Market capitalization diverges sharply here: 84.4 M versus 957,325, giving Mountain Province a clear size advantage. Mountain Province dwarfs North Bay on market cap at 84.4 M versus 318,618. Revenue tilts toward Mountain Province at 308.7 M compared with 60,407.
    
 Better Than Average     
    
 Worse Than Peers    View Performance Chart
MPVDF HWKDF NBRI CFTN XTRRF COSRF TSDRF MAGE GGLXF
 20.00 
0.04
Mountain
 0.00 
0.03
Hawkeye
 20.00 
0.0004
North
 6.67 
0.16
Clifton
 9.68 
0.28
X-Terra
 0.56 
0.05
Cosigo
 7.14 
0.13
Tsodilo
 30.00 
0.26
Magellan
 0.00 
0.04
GGL
Market Volatility
(90 Days Market Risk)
Market Performance
(90 Days Performance)
Odds of Financial Distress
(Probability Of Bankruptcy)
Current Valuation
(Equity Enterprise Value)
Buy or Sell Analysis
(Average Analysts Consensus)
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Trade Advice
(90 Days Macroaxis Advice)
Current Ratio
Net Asset
Profit Margin
EBITDA
Operating Margin
Current Valuation
Price To Book
Retained Earnings
Current Asset
Beta
Number Of Employees
Shares Outstanding
Cash Flow From Operations
Total Debt
Return On Equity
Z Score
Return On Asset
Number Of Shares Shorted
Book Value Per Share
Current Liabilities
Total Asset
Debt To Equity
Short Ratio
Shares Owned By Institutions
Market Capitalization
Price To Earning
Price To Sales
Net Income
Earnings Per Share
Shares Owned By Insiders
Revenue
Working Capital
Cash And Equivalents
Cash Per Share
Gross Profit
Day Typical Price
Accumulation Distribution
Market Facilitation Index
Daily Balance Of Power
Period Momentum Indicator
Rate Of Daily Change
Day Median Price
Price Action Indicator
Relative Strength Index
Coefficient Of Variation
Mean Deviation
Jensen Alpha
Total Risk Alpha
Sortino Ratio
Downside Variance
Standard Deviation
Kurtosis
Potential Upside
Treynor Ratio
Maximum Drawdown
Variance
Market Risk Adjusted Performance
Risk Adjusted Performance
Skewness
Semi Deviation
Information Ratio
Value At Risk
Expected Short fall
Downside Deviation
Semi Variance

Mountain Province Competition Peer Performance Charts

How to Analyze Mountain Province Against Peers

Mountain Province's peer analysis compares Mountain Province with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This helps determine whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:
  • Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
  • Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
  • Check valuation dispersion: Review whether Mountain Province trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
  • Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
  • Document the thesis: Record where Mountain Province leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.
Use this as an educational baseline, then validate conclusions with current filings, market conditions, and portfolio objectives.

Peer Comparison Metrics & Methodology

The competition view for Mountain Province includes both market-cap-weighted peers and natural business competitors, which are not always the same companies. Momentum comparison for Mountain Province across peers can signal rotation when peers accelerate while Mountain Province lags or vice versa. Peer benchmarking can improve context for valuation without relying only on standalone multiples. For peer comparison, Mountain Province has a market cap of 84.36 M, P/E of 0.4, profit margin of 73.45%.

For Mountain Province Diamonds, this section uses periodic company reporting and market reference feeds with Macroaxis normalization rules applied to keep cross-asset comparisons consistent. Intraday timing differences may exist.

This content is curated and reviewed by:

Raphi Shpitalnik - Junior Member of Macroaxis Editorial Board
Last reviewed on February 27th, 2026