Latin Competitors

LMSQF Stock  USD 0.17  -0.01  -5.56%   
The company classifies itself in the Other Industrial Metals & Mining industry (Basic Materials sector). Latin Metals operates alongside Strategic Metals, BCM Resources, LithiumBank Resources, Taranis Resources, and Eminent Gold and other firms in the same space. This peer view supports relative benchmarking. This peer module benchmarks Latin Metals across key technical and fundamental signals.

Latin Metals and Scandium Canada Correlation View

Poor diversification

For the present investment horizon, the measured correlation between LMSQF and SCDCF stands at 0.62, or Poor diversification. The cleaner interpretation is to review correlation beside volatility, expected return, and the role each holding plays in the portfolio.

Moving together with Latin OTC Stock

  0.81BHPLF BHP Group LimitedPairCorr
  0.84BHP BHP Group LimitedPairCorr
  0.84RIO Rio Tinto ADRPairCorr
  0.8RTNTF Rio Tinto GroupPairCorr
  0.83RTPPF Rio Tinto GroupPairCorr

Moving against Latin OTC Stock

  0.7TRNR Interactive StrengthPairCorr
  0.58NIVF NewGenIvf GroupPairCorr
  0.55APVO Aptevo TherapeuticsPairCorr
  0.52VLCN Volcon Inc Symbol ChangePairCorr
  0.31SYTA Siyata Mobile Symbol ChangePairCorr
Specify up to 10 symbols:
Applying mean reversion analysis to Latin Metals' requires identifying the appropriate reference point - whether book value, historical earnings multiple, or sector median - against which current prices are measured.
Hype
Prediction
LowEstimatedHigh
0.010.175.79
Details
Intrinsic
Valuation
LowRealHigh
0.010.185.80
Details
Naive
Forecast
LowNextHigh
0.00310.165.78
Details
Bollinger
Band Projection (param)
LowerMiddle BandUpper
0.160.190.22
Details
Sector peer analysis for Latin Metals provides the reference frame needed to determine whether Latin Metals' current valuation is justified by relative performance or inflated by momentum or narrative.

Latin Metals Competition Correlation Matrix

Correlation analysis between Latin Metals and its competitors helps investors understand whether diversification is real or only superficial inside the same peer group. This matrix is most informative when investors want to know whether adding another peer would improve diversification, increase crowding, or leave total risk largely unchanged.

High positive correlations

EMGDFSMDZF
EMGDFBCMRF
SCDCFEMGDF
BCMRFSMDZF
GPMTFGWRRF
WMLLFTNREF
  

High negative correlations

SCDCFGPMTF
GPMTFEMGDF
GPMTFBCMRF
GPMTFSMDZF
MSMGFSMDZF
SCDCFGWRRF

Risk-Adjusted Indicators

There is a big difference between Latin OTC Stock performing well and Latin Metals OTC Stock doing well as a business compared to the competition. There are so many exceptions to the norm that investors cannot definitively determine what's good or bad unless they analyze Latin Metals' multiple risk-adjusted performance indicators across the competitive landscape. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.

Latin Metals Competitive Analysis

To gauge Latin Metals' financial strength, comparing it with Strategic Metals, BCM Resources, and EnGold Mines offers useful context. Latin Metals is valued at 12.8 M. Latin Metals posts a -22.10% return on equity, reflecting current earnings headwinds. Return on equity favors Strategic Metals at -1.98%, well ahead of Latin Metals at -22.10%. BCM Resources holds the larger valuation at 17.0 M versus 12.8 M. Latin Metals dwarfs EnGold Mines on market cap at 12.8 M versus 2.2 M.
    
 Better Than Average     
    
 Worse Than Peers    View Performance Chart
LMSQF SMDZF BCMRF GWRRF LBNKF TNREF EMGDF WMLLF GPMTF MSMGF
 5.56 
0.17
Latin
 6.45 
0.29
Strategic
 6.25 
0.15
BCM
 0.00 
0.0043
EnGold
 1.82 
0.54
LithiumBank
 7.69 
0.14
Taranis
 5.66 
0.50
Eminent
 0.00 
0.05
Wealth
 3.33 
0.06
GPM
 8.31 
0.08
Grid
Market Volatility
(90 Days Market Risk)
Market Performance
(90 Days Performance)
Odds of Financial Distress
(Probability Of Bankruptcy)
Current Valuation
(Equity Enterprise Value)
Buy or Sell Analysis
(Average Analysts Consensus)
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Trade Advice
(90 Days Macroaxis Advice)
Current Ratio
Net Asset
EBITDA
Current Valuation
Price To Book
Retained Earnings
Current Asset
Beta
Number Of Employees
Shares Outstanding
Cash Flow From Operations
Total Debt
Return On Equity
Z Score
Return On Asset
Book Value Per Share
Current Liabilities
Total Asset
Debt To Equity
Shares Owned By Institutions
Market Capitalization
Price To Earning
Net Income
Earnings Per Share
Shares Owned By Insiders
Working Capital
Cash And Equivalents
Cash Per Share
Gross Profit
Day Typical Price
Accumulation Distribution
Market Facilitation Index
Daily Balance Of Power
Period Momentum Indicator
Rate Of Daily Change
Day Median Price
Price Action Indicator
Coefficient Of Variation
Mean Deviation
Jensen Alpha
Total Risk Alpha
Sortino Ratio
Downside Variance
Standard Deviation
Kurtosis
Potential Upside
Treynor Ratio
Maximum Drawdown
Variance
Market Risk Adjusted Performance
Risk Adjusted Performance
Skewness
Semi Deviation
Information Ratio
Value At Risk
Expected Short fall
Downside Deviation
Semi Variance

Peer Performance Charts

How to Analyze Latin Metals Against Peers

Latin Metals' peer analysis compares Latin Metals with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This helps determine whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:
  • Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
  • Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
  • Check valuation dispersion: Review whether Latin Metals trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
  • Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
  • Document the thesis: Record where Latin Metals leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.
Use this as an educational baseline, then validate conclusions with current filings, market conditions, and portfolio objectives.