Latin Competitors
| LMSQF Stock | USD 0.17 -0.01 -5.56% |
Latin Metals and Scandium Canada Correlation View
Poor diversification
For the present investment horizon, the measured correlation between LMSQF and SCDCF stands at 0.62, or Poor diversification. The cleaner interpretation is to review correlation beside volatility, expected return, and the role each holding plays in the portfolio.
Moving together with Latin OTC Stock
| 0.81 | BHPLF | BHP Group Limited | PairCorr |
| 0.84 | BHP | BHP Group Limited | PairCorr |
| 0.84 | RIO | Rio Tinto ADR | PairCorr |
| 0.8 | RTNTF | Rio Tinto Group | PairCorr |
| 0.83 | RTPPF | Rio Tinto Group | PairCorr |
Moving against Latin OTC Stock
Applying mean reversion analysis to Latin Metals' requires identifying the appropriate reference point - whether book value, historical earnings multiple, or sector median - against which current prices are measured.
Latin Metals Competition Correlation Matrix
Correlation analysis between Latin Metals and its competitors helps investors understand whether diversification is real or only superficial inside the same peer group. This matrix is most informative when investors want to know whether adding another peer would improve diversification, increase crowding, or leave total risk largely unchanged.
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
There is a big difference between Latin OTC Stock performing well and Latin Metals OTC Stock doing well as a business compared to the competition. There are so many exceptions to the norm that investors cannot definitively determine what's good or bad unless they analyze Latin Metals' multiple risk-adjusted performance indicators across the competitive landscape. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMDZF | 3.01 | 0.60 | 0.11 | -21.79 | 3.33 | 5.00 | 16.77 | |||
| BCMRF | 10.37 | 2.01 | 0.11 | 0.69 | 10.75 | 28.57 | 93.01 | |||
| GWRRF | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||
| LBNKF | 4.47 | 0.50 | 0.09 | 2.13 | 4.79 | 13.89 | 52.10 | |||
| TNREF | 7.54 | 0.99 | 0.05 | -0.89 | 9.83 | 18.18 | 125.77 | |||
| EMGDF | 5.97 | 1.63 | 0.28 | 1.90 | 4.80 | 17.86 | 44.44 | |||
| WMLLF | 5.74 | 0.48 | 0.03 | 3.70 | 6.88 | 20.00 | 53.33 | |||
| GPMTF | 1.34 | -0.67 | 0.00 | -5.06 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 24.34 | |||
| MSMGF | 3.84 | -0.31 | 0.00 | -1.80 | 0.00 | 10.00 | 20.09 | |||
| SCDCF | 6.56 | 0.95 | 0.10 | 1.59 | 6.41 | 15.38 | 57.21 |
Latin Metals Competitive Analysis
To gauge Latin Metals' financial strength, comparing it with Strategic Metals, BCM Resources, and EnGold Mines offers useful context. Latin Metals is valued at 12.8 M. Latin Metals posts a -22.10% return on equity, reflecting current earnings headwinds. Return on equity favors Strategic Metals at -1.98%, well ahead of Latin Metals at -22.10%. BCM Resources holds the larger valuation at 17.0 M versus 12.8 M. Latin Metals dwarfs EnGold Mines on market cap at 12.8 M versus 2.2 M.| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
Peer Performance Charts
How to Analyze Latin Metals Against Peers
Latin Metals' peer analysis compares Latin Metals with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This helps determine whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:- Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
- Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
- Check valuation dispersion: Review whether Latin Metals trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
- Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
- Document the thesis: Record where Latin Metals leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.