Labrador Competitors
| LBRMF Stock | USD 0.0003 0.0001 50.00% |
Correlation: Labrador Iron vs Jasper Mining Details
Modest diversification
For the present investment horizon, the measured correlation between LBRMF and JAMGF stands at 0.23, or Modest diversification. The cleaner interpretation is to review correlation beside volatility, expected return, and the role each holding plays in the portfolio.
While mean reversion in Labrador Iron's is a statistically observable tendency, it operates on uncertain timelines. Positions sized too aggressively against the trend can suffer sustained losses before reversion occurs.
Labrador Iron Competition Correlation Matrix
Correlation analysis between Labrador Iron Mines and its competitors helps investors understand whether diversification is real or only superficial inside the same peer group. This matrix is most informative when investors want to know whether adding another peer would improve diversification, increase crowding, or leave total risk largely unchanged.
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
There is a big difference between Labrador Pink Sheet performing well and Labrador Iron Company doing well as a business compared to the competition. There are so many exceptions to the norm that investors cannot definitively determine what's good or bad unless they analyze Labrador Iron's multiple risk-adjusted performance indicators across the competitive landscape. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GQMLF | 130.55 | 63.89 | 0.00 | -0.95 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1,594 | |||
| ORMNF | 5.84 | 0.75 | 0.07 | 0.25 | 6.65 | 13.33 | 47.34 | |||
| CRSTF | 0.42 | 0.20 | 0.00 | 0.76 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 14.12 | |||
| PRRSF | 6.95 | 0.63 | 0.06 | 0.66 | 8.15 | 15.47 | 60.54 | |||
| ALEEF | 4.73 | 1.76 | 0.16 | -0.96 | 2.93 | 19.41 | 55.81 | |||
| BKTPF | 10.30 | 1.14 | 0.07 | 5.53 | 11.00 | 33.83 | 102.08 | |||
| PXCLY | 1.31 | -0.39 | 0.00 | 0.94 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 62.27 | |||
| RECHF | 8.27 | 2.46 | 0.26 | -0.40 | 5.71 | 10.00 | 36.67 | |||
| HBKRF | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||
| JAMGF | 1.22 | 0.32 | 0.00 | -0.29 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 56.25 |
Labrador Iron Competitive Analysis
Examining Labrador Iron performance alongside its competitors is a fundamental step in evaluating any equity investment. Competitive benchmarking of Labrador Iron's key financial ratios reveals whether the company is a sector leader or laggard.| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
Labrador Iron Peer Performance Charts
How to Analyze Labrador Iron Against Peers
Labrador Iron's peer analysis compares Labrador Iron with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This helps determine whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:- Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
- Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
- Check valuation dispersion: Review whether Labrador Iron trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
- Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
- Document the thesis: Record where Labrador Iron leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.