Loblaw Competitors
| L Stock | CAD 63.32 1.38 2.23% |
Pair Correlation for Loblaw Companies and Maple Leaf Snapshot
Poor diversification
The correlation between L and MFI is 0.6, which Macroaxis classifies as Poor diversification for the selected horizon. The overlap area represents the portion of risk that may be diversified away when both instruments are held together and nothing else in the portfolio changes.
Moving against Loblaw Stock
The degree to which Loblaw Companies' exhibits mean reversion depends on how efficiently the market prices new information. In highly covered equities, the mean reversion window tends to be shorter.
Loblaw Companies Competition Correlation Matrix
Correlation analysis between Loblaw Companies Limited and its competitors helps investors understand whether diversification is real or only superficial inside the same peer group. This matrix is most informative when investors want to know whether adding another peer would improve diversification, increase crowding, or leave total risk largely unchanged.
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
There is a big difference between Loblaw Stock performing well and Loblaw Companies Company doing well as a business compared to the competition. There are so many exceptions to the norm that investors cannot definitively determine what's good or bad unless they analyze Loblaw Companies' multiple risk-adjusted performance indicators across the competitive landscape. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WN | 0.92 | 0.04 | 0.07 | -0.27 | 1.26 | 2.27 | 7.20 | |||
| MRU | 0.79 | -0.08 | 0.00 | 0.72 | 0.00 | 1.77 | 7.09 | |||
| EMP-A | 1.24 | -0.07 | 0.00 | 0.14 | 0.00 | 3.16 | 9.73 | |||
| TPX-B | 1.66 | -0.04 | 0.00 | -0.18 | 0.00 | 3.38 | 8.26 | |||
| SAP | 0.98 | 0.12 | 0.16 | -0.34 | 1.01 | 2.37 | 6.42 | |||
| NWC | 0.91 | 0.17 | 0.19 | -1.71 | 1.02 | 2.30 | 6.04 | |||
| PESO | 2.86 | 0.77 | 0.13 | -6.34 | 3.27 | 7.14 | 27.99 | |||
| JWEL | 1.06 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 1.19 | 2.55 | 6.18 | |||
| MFI | 1.16 | 0.20 | 0.21 | -0.95 | 0.98 | 2.55 | 8.05 |
Loblaw Companies Competitive Analysis
Placing Loblaw Companies next to George Weston, Metro, and Empire Company puts raw numbers into competitive context. A 74.21 B valuation paired with 63.90 B in revenue sets the baseline. Profitability stands at a 4.17% net margin with return on equity reaching 23.17%. Earnings multiples split the pair: 43.59x for Loblaw Companies against 18.43x for George Weston. Loblaw Companies dwarfs Metro on market cap at 74.21 B versus 20.25 B. Profit margins tilt toward Loblaw Companies at 4.17% against Empire Company at 0.50%.| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
Peer Performance Charts
How to Analyze Loblaw Companies Against Peers
Loblaw Companies' peer analysis compares Loblaw Companies with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This helps determine whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:- Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
- Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
- Check valuation dispersion: Review whether Loblaw Companies trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
- Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
- Document the thesis: Record where Loblaw Companies leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.