Karolinska Competitors
| KDEV Stock | SEK 0.29 0.00 0.00% |
Pair Correlation for Karolinska Development and AlzeCure Pharma Snapshot
Weak diversification
The correlation between KDEV and ALZCUR is 0.3, which Macroaxis classifies as Weak diversification for the selected horizon. The overlap area represents the portion of risk that may be diversified away when both instruments are held together and nothing else in the portfolio changes.
Moving against Karolinska Stock
The degree to which Karolinska Development's exhibits mean reversion depends on how efficiently the market prices new information. In highly covered equities, the mean reversion window tends to be shorter.
Karolinska Development Competition Correlation Matrix
Correlation analysis between Karolinska Development AB and its competitors helps investors understand whether diversification is real or only superficial inside the same peer group. This matrix is most informative when investors want to know whether adding another peer would improve diversification, increase crowding, or leave total risk largely unchanged.
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
There is a big difference between Karolinska Stock performing well and Karolinska Development Company doing well as a business compared to the competition. There are so many exceptions to the norm that investors cannot definitively determine what's good or bad unless they analyze Karolinska Development's multiple risk-adjusted performance indicators across the competitive landscape. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IRLAB-A | 2.70 | -0.34 | 0.00 | 0.56 | 0.00 | 6.51 | 18.07 | |||
| LIPUM | 0.72 | -0.07 | 0.00 | -0.18 | 0.00 | 1.75 | 5.07 | |||
| ISOFOL | 2.77 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -0.01 | 3.13 | 2.99 | 50.92 | |||
| BIOWKS | 2.96 | 0.42 | 0.13 | -0.39 | 2.74 | 8.89 | 16.66 | |||
| ANNX | 4.18 | -0.57 | 0.00 | 3.02 | 0.00 | 9.04 | 44.62 | |||
| INIT | 2.30 | 0.16 | 0.06 | 0.62 | 2.58 | 6.47 | 19.49 | |||
| BOUL | 2.92 | -0.57 | 0.00 | 2.52 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 15.09 | |||
| MNTC | 2.22 | -0.08 | 0.00 | -0.20 | 0.00 | 5.24 | 13.16 | |||
| ALZCUR | 3.20 | -0.03 | 0.00 | -0.17 | 0.00 | 9.55 | 21.85 |
Karolinska Development Competitive Analysis
Karolinska Development competitive analysis is a powerful tool for investors seeking to contextualize Karolinska Development's financial performance. Comparing Karolinska Development's key ratios to peers highlights areas where the company excels or needs improvement.| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
Karolinska Development Peer Performance Charts
How to Analyze Karolinska Development Against Peers
Karolinska Development's peer analysis compares Karolinska Development with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This helps determine whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:- Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
- Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
- Check valuation dispersion: Review whether Karolinska Development trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
- Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
- Document the thesis: Record where Karolinska Development leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.