IShares MSCI Competition
| IMTM Etf | USD 49.51 0.05 0.10% |
Pair Correlation for IShares MSCI and 2023 ETF Snapshot
Good diversification
The correlation between IMTM and EAGL is -0.09, which Macroaxis classifies as Good diversification for the selected horizon. Used correctly, the chart helps investors judge whether adding the second position genuinely diversifies the first.
Moving together with IShares Etf
| 0.98 | VEA | Vanguard FTSE Developed | PairCorr |
| 0.99 | IEFA | iShares Core MSCI | PairCorr |
| 0.99 | VEU | Vanguard FTSE All | PairCorr |
| 0.99 | EFA | iShares MSCI EAFE | PairCorr |
| 0.99 | IXUS | iShares Core MSCI | PairCorr |
Moving against IShares Etf
The degree to which IShares MSCI's exhibits mean reversion depends on how efficiently the market prices new information. In highly covered equities, the mean reversion window tends to be shorter.
IShares MSCI Competition Correlation Matrix
Correlation analysis between iShares MSCI Intl and its competitors helps investors understand whether diversification is real or only superficial inside the same peer group. This matrix is most informative when investors want to know whether adding another peer would improve diversification, increase crowding, or leave total risk largely unchanged.
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
IShares MSCI Constituents Risk-Adjusted Indicators
There is a big difference between IShares Etf performing well and IShares MSCI ETF doing well as a business compared to the competition. There are so many exceptions to the norm that investors cannot definitively determine what's good or bad unless they analyze IShares MSCI's multiple risk-adjusted performance indicators across the competitive landscape. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EWC | 0.68 | 0.12 | 0.10 | 0.15 | 1.06 | 1.24 | 5.25 | |||
| IVLU | 0.69 | 0.12 | 0.14 | -0.95 | 0.89 | 1.30 | 5.43 | |||
| DON | 0.63 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.03 | 0.71 | 1.85 | 3.56 | |||
| AAXJ | 0.89 | 0.16 | 0.13 | 0.16 | 1.20 | 1.90 | 8.02 | |||
| CGDG | 0.52 | 0.05 | 0.07 | 0.05 | 0.66 | 0.82 | 4.00 | |||
| XT | 0.71 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.95 | 1.31 | 4.52 | |||
| ITB | 1.26 | -0.09 | 0.00 | -0.11 | 0.00 | 3.47 | 9.66 | |||
| EMLP | 0.51 | 0.18 | 0.38 | 2.70 | 0.17 | 0.99 | 3.01 | |||
| DEM | 0.59 | 0.11 | 0.15 | 0.18 | 0.70 | 1.25 | 4.58 | |||
| EAGL | 0.64 | -0.06 | 0.00 | 0.27 | 0.00 | 0.88 | 4.45 |
IShares MSCI Competitive Analysis
IShares MSCI competitive analysis is a powerful tool for investors seeking to contextualize IShares MSCI's financial performance. Comparing IShares MSCI's key ratios to peers highlights areas where the company excels or needs improvement.| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
IShares MSCI Peer Performance Charts
How to Analyze IShares MSCI Against Peers
IShares MSCI's peer analysis compares IShares MSCI with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This helps determine whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:- Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
- Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
- Check valuation dispersion: Review whether IShares MSCI trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
- Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
- Document the thesis: Record where IShares MSCI leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.