Hamilton Enhanced Competition
| HUTS Etf | 15.50 0.03 0.19% |
Hamilton Enhanced and Global X Correlation Snapshot
Weak diversification
The correlation between HUTS and HURA is 0.37, which Macroaxis classifies as Weak diversification for the selected horizon. The cleaner interpretation is to review correlation beside volatility, expected return, and the role each holding plays in the portfolio.
Moving together with Hamilton Etf
Moving against Hamilton Etf
Investors who believe in mean reversion view Hamilton Enhanced's price extremes not as permanent states but as temporary dislocations that create opportunities for disciplined, contrarian capital allocation.
Hamilton Enhanced Competition Correlation Matrix
Correlation analysis between Hamilton Enhanced Utilities and its competitors helps investors understand whether diversification is real or only superficial inside the same peer group. This matrix is most informative when investors want to know whether adding another peer would improve diversification, increase crowding, or leave total risk largely unchanged.
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Hamilton Enhanced Competition Risk-Adjusted Indicators
There is a big difference between Hamilton Etf performing well and Hamilton Enhanced ETF doing well as a business compared to the competition. There are so many exceptions to the norm that investors cannot definitively determine what's good or bad unless they analyze Hamilton Enhanced's multiple risk-adjusted performance indicators across the competitive landscape. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| META | 1.42 | -0.03 | 0.00 | -0.09 | 0.00 | 2.30 | 13.69 | |||
| MSFT | 1.28 | -0.25 | 0.00 | -0.77 | 0.00 | 2.19 | 13.28 | |||
| UBER | 1.58 | -0.31 | 0.00 | -0.96 | 0.00 | 2.70 | 11.09 | |||
| F | 1.34 | -0.04 | 0.00 | -0.09 | 0.00 | 3.61 | 10.01 | |||
| T | 1.13 | 0.13 | 0.14 | -0.58 | 1.21 | 3.87 | 8.53 | |||
| A | 1.29 | -0.34 | 0.00 | -0.37 | 0.00 | 2.48 | 7.20 | |||
| CRM | 1.74 | -0.36 | 0.00 | -0.66 | 0.00 | 3.41 | 9.78 | |||
| JPM | 1.24 | -0.08 | 0.00 | -0.10 | 0.00 | 2.34 | 8.17 | |||
| MRK | 1.18 | 0.27 | 0.19 | 0.49 | 1.27 | 2.54 | 7.29 | |||
| XOM | 1.34 | 0.43 | 0.32 | 14.65 | 1.12 | 2.90 | 6.83 |
Hamilton Enhanced Competitive Analysis
| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
Peer Performance Charts
How to Analyze Hamilton Enhanced Against Peers
Hamilton Enhanced's peer analysis compares Hamilton Enhanced with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This helps determine whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:- Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
- Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
- Check valuation dispersion: Review whether Hamilton Enhanced trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
- Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
- Document the thesis: Record where Hamilton Enhanced leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.