Hub Competitors
| HUBCZ Stock | 0.01 0.0035 43.21% |
Hub Cyber vs Wellchange Holdings Correlation Summary
Good diversification
Across the chosen horizon, HUBCZ and WCT show a correlation of -0.04 and fall into the Good diversification bucket. The overlap area represents the portion of risk that may be diversified away when both instruments are held together and nothing else in the portfolio changes.
Moving against Hub Stock
The concept of mean reversion suggests that Hub Cyber's price will eventually return toward its long-run average. High prices may deter value investors, while unusually low prices often attract buyers who anticipate a recovery.
Hub Cyber Competition Correlation Matrix
Correlation analysis between Hub Cyber Security and its competitors helps investors understand whether diversification is real or only superficial inside the same peer group. This matrix is most informative when investors want to know whether adding another peer would improve diversification, increase crowding, or leave total risk largely unchanged.
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
There is a big difference between Hub Stock performing well and Hub Cyber Company doing well as a business compared to the competition. There are so many exceptions to the norm that investors cannot definitively determine what's good or bad unless they analyze Hub Cyber's multiple risk-adjusted performance indicators across the competitive landscape. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BNAI | 21.77 | 8.61 | 0.59 | 3.06 | 12.05 | 62.50 | 329.67 | |||
| MNDO | 1.20 | -0.04 | 0.00 | -0.08 | 0.00 | 2.54 | 9.37 | |||
| XBP | 5.07 | 0.01 | 0.00 | -0.01 | 0.00 | 11.53 | 42.58 | |||
| MSAI | 5.33 | -0.67 | 0.00 | -0.19 | 0.00 | 10.71 | 36.59 | |||
| NXPL | 3.53 | -0.29 | 0.00 | -0.15 | 0.00 | 8.33 | 20.81 | |||
| BLIN | 3.02 | -0.09 | 0.00 | -0.19 | 0.00 | 6.10 | 23.82 | |||
| SVREW | 13.57 | 0.02 | 0.01 | -0.02 | 16.01 | 51.32 | 104.01 | |||
| CXAI | 5.54 | -0.84 | 0.00 | -2.70 | 0.00 | 10.53 | 37.34 | |||
| WCT | 4.77 | -1.34 | 0.00 | 17.66 | 0.00 | 10.88 | 48.92 |
Peer Comparison: Net Income
Net income is one of the most important fundamental items in finance. It plays a large role in Hub Cyber Security financial statement analysis. It represents the amount of money remaining after all of Hub Cyber Security operating expenses, interest, taxes and preferred stock dividends have been deducted from a company total revenue.Compare Hub Cyber Security and related stocks such as Brand Engagement Network, MIND CTI, and XBP Europe Holdings Net Income Over Time
Select Fundamental| 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BNAI | -820.1 K | -820.1 K | -820.1 K | -820.1 K | -820.1 K | -820.1 K | -820.1 K | -820.1 K | -820.1 K | -820.1 K | -820.1 K | -820.1 K | -676 K | -11.7 M | -33.7 M | -30.3 M | -28.8 M |
| MNDO | 1.5 M | 4.3 M | 4.3 M | 2.2 M | 5.5 M | 5 M | 4.2 M | 5.6 M | 5.1 M | 5.1 M | 5.4 M | 5.9 M | 5.3 M | 5.2 M | 4.6 M | 2.6 M | 3.8 M |
| XBP | -7 M | -7 M | -7 M | -7 M | -7 M | -7 M | -7 M | -7 M | -7 M | -7 M | -28.4 M | -12.7 M | -7.9 M | -11 M | -12.4 M | -14.2 M | -14.9 M |
| MSAI | 2.3 M | 2.3 M | 2.3 M | 2.3 M | 2.3 M | 2.3 M | 2.3 M | 2.3 M | 2.3 M | 2.3 M | 2.3 M | 2.3 M | -13.3 M | -22.3 M | -21.5 M | -19.3 M | -20.3 M |
| NXPL | -716.3 K | -8.7 M | -4.8 M | 624.1 K | -411.2 K | -2.1 M | -2.6 M | -3.9 M | -1.2 M | -1.4 M | -2.8 M | -8.1 M | -9.2 M | -3.8 M | -14 M | -12.6 M | -12 M |
| BLIN | -178 K | -946 K | -3.6 M | -6.2 M | -16.8 M | -7.8 M | -1.6 M | -7.2 M | -9.5 M | 326 K | -6.7 M | 2.1 M | -9.4 M | -2 M | -2.5 M | -2.3 M | -2.4 M |
| SVREW | 33.3 M | 76.4 M | 108.5 M | 176.9 M | 225.5 M | 317.2 M | 264.9 M | -9.6 M | -11.6 M | -9.4 M | -13.6 M | -26.5 M | -25 M | -33.8 M | -34.9 M | -31.4 M | -29.9 M |
| CXAI | -9.8 M | -9.8 M | -9.8 M | -9.8 M | -9.8 M | -9.8 M | -9.8 M | -9.8 M | -9.8 M | -9.8 M | -9.8 M | 9.2 M | -29.2 M | -53.6 M | -19.4 M | -17.5 M | -18.3 M |
| WCT | 171.5 K | 171.5 K | 171.5 K | 171.5 K | 171.5 K | 171.5 K | 171.5 K | 171.5 K | 171.5 K | 171.5 K | 171.5 K | 171.5 K | 780.6 K | 937.6 K | -431.5 K | -388.4 K | -369 K |
Hub Cyber Competitive Analysis
Analyzing Hub Cyber alongside its competitors can reveal how well the company is executing relative to peers. For longer-term investors, tracking Hub Cyber's market share trends against competition is a key input for investment decisions. Hub Cyber's competitive standing becomes clearer when measured alongside Brand Engagement, MIND CTI, and XBP Europe. The -1500.96% return on equity and -187.97% profit margin point to near-term profitability challenges for Hub Cyber. Brand Engagement offers a useful contrast. Top-line revenue favors Hub Cyber by a wide margin: 29.6 M to 99,790. Against MIND CTI, Hub Cyber shows a different profile. Return on equity favors MIND CTI at 12.73%, well ahead of Hub Cyber at -1500.96%. XBP Europe offers a useful contrast. XBP Europe keeps more of each revenue dollar with a 1940.82% margin versus -187.97% at Hub Cyber. Ultimately, whether Hub Cyber represents the stronger opportunity depends on which metrics investors prioritize and how sustainable the current peer dynamics prove to be.| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
Hub Cyber Peer Performance Charts
How to Analyze Hub Cyber Against Peers
Hub Cyber's peer analysis compares Hub Cyber with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This helps determine whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:- Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
- Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
- Check valuation dispersion: Review whether Hub Cyber trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
- Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
- Document the thesis: Record where Hub Cyber leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.