FRANKLIN FEDERAL Competition
| FTFZX Fund | USD 10.45 -0.01 -0.1% |
FRANKLIN FEDERAL vs T ROWE Correlation Overview
Almost no diversification
For the present investment horizon, the measured correlation between FTFZX and PRFHX stands at 0.98, or Almost no diversification. The cleaner interpretation is to review correlation beside volatility, expected return, and the role each holding plays in the portfolio.
Moving together with FRANKLIN Mutual Fund
Sophisticated investors, who have witnessed many market ups and downs, anticipate that the market will even out over time. This tendency of FRANKLIN FEDERAL's price to converge to an average value over time is called mean reversion.
FRANKLIN FEDERAL Competition Correlation Matrix
Correlation analysis between Franklin Federal Limited Term and its competitors helps investors understand whether diversification is real or only superficial inside the same peer group. This matrix is most informative when investors want to know whether adding another peer would improve diversification, increase crowding, or leave total risk largely unchanged.
| 0.99 | 0.96 | 0.97 | 0.99 | 0.97 | PCMNX | ||
| 0.99 | 0.97 | 0.98 | 0.99 | 0.98 | TIMTX | ||
| 0.96 | 0.97 | 0.99 | 0.98 | 0.99 | MDMTX | ||
| 0.97 | 0.98 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 | PATFX | ||
| 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.98 | 0.99 | 0.99 | TWTIX | ||
| 0.97 | 0.98 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 | PRFHX | ||
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
There is a big difference between FRANKLIN Mutual Fund performing well and FRANKLIN FEDERAL Mutual Fund doing well as a business compared to the competition. There are so many exceptions to the norm that investors cannot definitively determine what's good or bad unless they analyze FRANKLIN FEDERAL's multiple risk-adjusted performance indicators across the competitive landscape. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCMNX | 0.06 | 0.01 | 0.10 | -1.58 | 0.00 | 0.16 | 0.72 | |||
| TIMTX | 0.08 | 0.01 | 0.12 | 1.50 | 0.00 | 0.19 | 0.83 | |||
| MDMTX | 0.08 | 0.01 | 0.08 | -3.81 | 0.00 | 0.19 | 0.96 | |||
| PATFX | 0.11 | 0.01 | 0.11 | -0.97 | 0.00 | 0.27 | 1.07 | |||
| TWTIX | 0.08 | 0.01 | 0.11 | 0.62 | 0.00 | 0.19 | 0.83 | |||
| PRFHX | 0.11 | 0.02 | 0.13 | -0.72 | 0.00 | 0.27 | 1.17 |
FRANKLIN FEDERAL Competitive Analysis
The better you understand FRANKLIN FEDERAL competitors, the better chance you have of utilizing it as a position in your portfolios. From an individual investor's perspective, FRANKLIN FEDERAL's competitive analysis can cover a whole range of metrics.| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
FRANKLIN FEDERAL Peer Performance Charts
How to Analyze FRANKLIN FEDERAL Against Peers
FRANKLIN FEDERAL's peer analysis compares FRANKLIN FEDERAL with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This helps determine whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:- Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
- Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
- Check valuation dispersion: Review whether FRANKLIN FEDERAL trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
- Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
- Document the thesis: Record where FRANKLIN FEDERAL leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.