FEDERATED GLOBAL Competition
| FSTBX Fund | USD 21.88 -0.16 -0.73% |
Correlation: FEDERATED GLOBAL vs Polen Global Overview
Very good diversification
The correlation between FSTBX and PGIRX is -0.48, which Macroaxis classifies as Very good diversification for the selected horizon. The cleaner interpretation is to review correlation beside volatility, expected return, and the role each holding plays in the portfolio.
Moving together with FEDERATED Mutual Fund
| 0.95 | EMDIX | Federated Emerging Market | PairCorr |
| 0.82 | STISX | Federated Strategic | PairCorr |
| 1.0 | FSBCX | Federated Global | PairCorr |
Moving against FEDERATED Mutual Fund
Mean reversion is the tendency of FEDERATED GLOBAL's price to return to its historical average after periods of extreme deviation. Investors who identify when FEDERATED GLOBAL's is significantly above or below its mean may find compelling entry or exit opportunities.
FEDERATED GLOBAL Competition Correlation Matrix
Reviewing how Federated Global Allocation moves relative to competing funds can show whether peer exposure is reducing portfolio risk or simply repeating the same market bet. This matrix is most informative when investors want to know whether adding another peer would improve diversification, increase crowding, or leave total risk largely unchanged.
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
Strong stock returns do not always mean FEDERATED GLOBAL Mutual Fund is outperforming its peers on a fundamental level. Risk-adjusted metrics allow investors to compare FEDERATED GLOBAL's efficiency and downside exposure against peers in a more meaningful way. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AGD | 0.97 | 0.12 | 0.11 | 0.20 | 1.09 | 1.91 | 7.32 | |||
| BGH | 0.36 | -0.10 | 0.00 | -0.91 | 0.00 | 0.63 | 2.59 | |||
| TLGAX | 0.90 | 0.02 | 0.00 | -0.03 | 0.00 | 1.54 | 5.46 | |||
| FSCCX | 0.77 | 0.01 | 0.00 | -0.03 | 0.00 | 1.49 | 4.97 | |||
| MMD | 0.36 | 0.05 | 0.19 | 0.39 | 0.36 | 0.65 | 2.87 | |||
| EDIIX | 0.47 | 0.01 | 0.00 | -0.02 | 0.00 | 0.91 | 2.61 | |||
| TDF | 0.75 | 0.01 | 0.00 | -0.03 | 0.00 | 1.56 | 5.83 | |||
| JOF | 1.07 | 0.08 | 0.06 | 0.10 | 1.61 | 2.51 | 8.70 | |||
| SAISX | 0.64 | 0.07 | 0.08 | 0.07 | 1.02 | 1.44 | 5.04 | |||
| PGIRX | 0.72 | -0.17 | 0.00 | -0.27 | 0.00 | 1.15 | 4.24 |
FEDERATED GLOBAL Competitive Analysis
| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
FEDERATED GLOBAL Competition Peer Performance Charts
How to Analyze FEDERATED GLOBAL Against Peers
FEDERATED GLOBAL's peer analysis compares FEDERATED GLOBAL with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This helps determine whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:- Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
- Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
- Check valuation dispersion: Review whether FEDERATED GLOBAL trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
- Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
- Document the thesis: Record where FEDERATED GLOBAL leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.
Peer Comparison Metrics & Methodology
The competition view for FEDERATED GLOBAL includes correlation data, so you can see not only which peers are financially similar but also which ones move together in the market. Competition analysis is most useful when price, margins, leverage, and growth are read together.
Data shown for Federated Global Allocation is aggregated from fund disclosures and market reference feeds and normalized across reporting formats. Source publication cadence can introduce delays.