Frasers Competitors
| FSRPF Stock | USD 0.90 0.15 20.00% |
Frasers Property and First Capital Correlation Summary
Very poor diversification
For the present investment horizon, the measured correlation between FSRPF and FCXXF stands at 0.88, or Very poor diversification. The cleaner interpretation is to review correlation beside volatility, expected return, and the role each holding plays in the portfolio.
Moving together with Frasers Pink Sheet
Moving against Frasers Pink Sheet
The mean reversion framework for Frasers Property is built on the premise that markets are not perfectly efficient and that prices periodically overshoot their intrinsic value in both directions.
Frasers Property Competition Correlation Matrix
Correlation analysis between Frasers Property Limited and its competitors helps investors understand whether diversification is real or only superficial inside the same peer group. This matrix is most informative when investors want to know whether adding another peer would improve diversification, increase crowding, or leave total risk largely unchanged.
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
There is a big difference between Frasers Pink Sheet performing well and Frasers Property Company doing well as a business compared to the competition. There are so many exceptions to the norm that investors cannot definitively determine what's good or bad unless they analyze Frasers Property's multiple risk-adjusted performance indicators across the competitive landscape. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HNLGF | 0.23 | 0.12 | 0.00 | 0.90 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 7.87 | |||
| HNLGY | 0.49 | 0.09 | 0.00 | -0.49 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 10.73 | |||
| LLESF | 0.13 | -0.08 | 0.00 | 1.13 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.48 | |||
| LLESY | 2.13 | -0.30 | 0.00 | 0.75 | 0.00 | 4.36 | 27.37 | |||
| FRZCF | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||
| CTRGF | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||
| UILCY | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||
| FRLOF | 0.58 | -0.09 | 0.00 | -0.19 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 29.03 | |||
| HUFAF | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||
| FCXXF | 0.45 | 0.21 | 0.00 | 1.54 | 0.00 | 1.75 | 4.76 |
Frasers Property Competitive Analysis
Frasers Property's competitive standing becomes clearer when measured alongside Hang Lung, Hang Lung, and Lend Lease. With 3.88 B in revenue and a 2.69 B market value, Frasers Property anchors one end of the peer spectrum. Profitability stands at a 23.94% net margin with return on equity reaching 9.39%. The market prices Frasers Property more richly at 24.29x earnings, while Hang Lung trades at 6.42x. Frasers Property converts shareholder equity more efficiently at 9.39% versus Hang Lung at 3.00%. Profit margins tilt toward Frasers Property at 23.94% against Lend Lease at -1.10%.| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
Peer Performance Charts
How to Analyze Frasers Property Against Peers
Frasers Property's peer analysis compares Frasers Property with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This helps determine whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:- Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
- Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
- Check valuation dispersion: Review whether Frasers Property trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
- Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
- Document the thesis: Record where Frasers Property leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.