Freemelt Holding Competitors
| FREEM Stock | 1.72 0.17 10.97% |
Freemelt Holding vs Realfiction Holding Correlation Summary
Very weak diversification
For the present investment horizon, the measured correlation between FREEM and REALFI stands at 0.52, or Very weak diversification. The cleaner interpretation is to review correlation beside volatility, expected return, and the role each holding plays in the portfolio.
Moving against Freemelt Stock
Mean reversion in Freemelt Holding is more reliable over longer time horizons. Short-term deviations can persist and even widen before correcting, making position sizing and risk management critical.
Freemelt Holding Competition Correlation Matrix
Competition correlation for Freemelt Holding AB matters because related securities often respond to the same industry, factor, or macro drivers even when their business stories differ. The business currently sits in the Technology sector and the Computer Hardware industry. In practical terms, lower correlation may offer better diversification while higher correlation may leave the portfolio more exposed to one shared driver.
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
There is a big difference between Freemelt Stock performing well and Freemelt Holding Company doing well as a business compared to the competition. A thorough review of Freemelt Holding's risk-adjusted indicators provides a clearer picture of whether returns are being earned efficiently. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOBII | 3.84 | -0.06 | 0.00 | -1.89 | 0.00 | 7.33 | 36.83 | |||
| AVEN | 1.62 | -0.20 | 0.00 | 0.78 | 0.00 | 2.98 | 9.66 | |||
| MAVEN | 3.21 | 0.02 | 0.00 | -0.07 | 0.00 | 6.67 | 28.41 | |||
| STAR-B | 1.74 | -0.27 | 0.00 | 0.65 | 0.00 | 4.37 | 19.09 | |||
| BINERO | 0.93 | -0.10 | 0.00 | -1.38 | 0.00 | 2.68 | 14.90 | |||
| B3 | 1.97 | -0.27 | 0.00 | -1.47 | 0.00 | 4.70 | 12.34 | |||
| GREAT | 3.78 | -0.50 | 0.00 | 1.85 | 0.00 | 18.79 | 40.30 | |||
| WAYS | 1.53 | 0.21 | 0.15 | -10.73 | 1.66 | 4.59 | 12.83 | |||
| MEAB-B | 1.81 | 0.35 | 0.17 | 0.59 | 1.86 | 4.66 | 14.61 | |||
| REALFI | 4.08 | -0.68 | 0.00 | 0.41 | 0.00 | 8.93 | 25.86 |
Freemelt Holding Competitive Analysis
How does Freemelt Holding measure up against Tobii AB, Avensia Publ, and Maven Wireless? The financials tell a nuanced story. Freemelt Holding operates at a 243.8 M scale with 6.4 M flowing through the income statement. With a -17.30% return on equity and -25.97% net margin, Freemelt Holding faces a more difficult earnings environment than some peers. Tobii AB pulls in 616.0 M in revenue while Freemelt Holding reports 6.4 M. Avensia Publ keeps more of each revenue dollar with a 3.59% margin versus -25.97% at Freemelt Holding. Freemelt Holding is dwarfed by Maven Wireless on market cap at 684.6 M versus 243.8 M.| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
Freemelt Holding Competition Peer Performance Charts
How to Analyze Freemelt Holding Against Peers
Freemelt Holding's peer analysis compares Freemelt Holding with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This helps determine whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:- Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
- Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
- Check valuation dispersion: Review whether Freemelt Holding trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
- Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
- Document the thesis: Record where Freemelt Holding leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.
Peer Comparison Metrics & Methodology
Peer analysis for Freemelt Holding rewards breadth of comparison over narrow single-company analysis - the more peer context incorporated, the sharper the relative assessment becomes. The peer set can help frame whether recent outperformance is broad-based or company-specific. For peer comparison, Freemelt Holding has a market cap of 243.76 M, profit margin of -25.97%.
The analytics block for Freemelt Holding AB relies on periodic company reporting and market reference feeds, with quality checks and normalization applied before rendering. Timing can vary by data vendor.