Franklin FTSE Competition
| FLAX Etf | USD 30.56 -0.62 -1.99% |
Pair Correlation for Franklin FTSE and Day HaganNed Overview
Very poor diversification
Across the chosen horizon, Franklin FTSE and Day HaganNed show a correlation of 0.89 and fall into the Very poor diversification bucket. The overlap area shows the portion of risk that can be diversified away by holding both instruments together.
Moving together with Franklin Etf
| 0.86 | BBAX | JPMorgan BetaBuilders | PairCorr |
| 1.0 | AAXJ | iShares MSCI All | PairCorr |
| 0.92 | EPP | iShares MSCI Pacific | PairCorr |
| 0.97 | AIA | iShares Asia 50 | PairCorr |
| 0.85 | GMF | SPDR SAMPP Emerging | PairCorr |
Moving against Franklin Etf
Experienced market participants anticipate that Franklin FTSE's price will even out over time. Periods when Franklin FTSE's deviates significantly from its historical mean may warrant further fundamental analysis.
Franklin FTSE Competition Correlation Matrix
Competition correlation for Franklin FTSE Asia matters because related securities often respond to the same industry, factor, or macro drivers even when their business stories differ. The useful question is whether competitors are behaving like true alternatives or simply tracking the same sector move with different volatility.
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Franklin FTSE Constituents Risk-Adjusted Indicators
Strong recent returns in Franklin Etf do not always mean Franklin FTSE ETF is outperforming peers on business quality. Risk-adjusted metrics help compare Franklin FTSE's efficiency and downside exposure against peers on a like-for-like basis. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors evaluate volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across different positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PTEU | 0.84 | 0.02 | 0.00 | -0.05 | 0.00 | 1.71 | 5.32 | |||
| NBJP | 1.06 | 0.13 | 0.08 | 0.06 | 1.48 | 2.40 | 7.00 | |||
| KEMQ | 1.39 | 0.01 | 0.00 | -0.05 | 0.00 | 3.24 | 10.05 | |||
| OZEM | 1.09 | -0.09 | 0.00 | -0.15 | 0.00 | 2.14 | 7.52 | |||
| XUDV | 0.59 | 0.11 | 0.19 | 0.11 | 0.60 | 1.08 | 3.34 | |||
| HOMZ | 0.94 | -0.13 | 0.00 | 0.53 | 0.00 | 2.35 | 5.67 | |||
| NIXT | 0.98 | 0.13 | 0.09 | 0.04 | 1.18 | 2.10 | 6.58 | |||
| CEFZ | 0.46 | 0.01 | 0.00 | -0.04 | 0.00 | 0.75 | 2.57 | |||
| NTSE | 1.10 | 0.23 | 0.12 | 0.12 | 1.55 | 2.83 | 7.70 | |||
| SSXU | 0.75 | 0.05 | 0.04 | -0.01 | 1.23 | 1.59 | 5.26 |
Franklin FTSE Competitive Analysis
| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
Franklin FTSE Competition Peer Performance Charts
How to Analyze Franklin FTSE Against Peers
Franklin FTSE's peer analysis compares Franklin FTSE with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This helps determine whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:- Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
- Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
- Check valuation dispersion: Review whether Franklin FTSE trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
- Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
- Document the thesis: Record where Franklin FTSE leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.
Peer Comparison Metrics & Methodology
Franklin FTSE generates higher gross margins than most of its direct competitors, which points to pricing power or a leaner cost base. Relative comparison helps show where Franklin FTSE is stronger or weaker against peers.
Data shown for Franklin FTSE Asia is aggregated from fund disclosures and market reference feeds and normalized across reporting formats. Source publication timing can introduce delays.