Fibra Competitors
| FBASF Stock | USD 1.60 0.05 3.23% |
Pair Correlation for Fibra UNO and Ayala Land Overview
Poor diversification
For the present investment horizon, the measured correlation between FBASF and AYAAF stands at 0.72, or Poor diversification. The cleaner interpretation is to review correlation beside volatility, expected return, and the role each holding plays in the portfolio.
Moving together with Fibra Pink Sheet
Moving against Fibra Pink Sheet
Mean reversion in Fibra UNO is more reliable over longer time horizons. Short-term deviations can persist and even widen before correcting, making position sizing and risk management critical.
Fibra UNO Competition Correlation Matrix
Correlation analysis between Fibra UNO and its competitors helps investors understand whether diversification is real or only superficial inside the same peer group. This matrix is most informative when investors want to know whether adding another peer would improve diversification, increase crowding, or leave total risk largely unchanged.
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
There is a big difference between Fibra Pink Sheet performing well and Fibra UNO Company doing well as a business compared to the competition. There are so many exceptions to the norm that investors cannot definitively determine what's good or bad unless they analyze Fibra UNO's multiple risk-adjusted performance indicators across the competitive landscape. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LNSPF | 0.96 | 0.26 | 0.14 | -0.70 | 0.62 | 3.73 | 15.42 | |||
| BRLAF | 1.76 | 0.20 | 0.00 | 0.28 | 0.00 | 9.44 | 35.32 | |||
| LDSCY | 1.32 | -0.03 | 0.00 | -0.04 | 0.00 | 2.05 | 10.89 | |||
| LSGOF | 0.49 | 0.18 | 0.00 | -3.97 | 0.00 | 2.40 | 8.97 | |||
| BTLCY | 1.17 | -0.11 | 0.00 | -0.37 | 0.00 | 2.16 | 6.98 | |||
| DEXSF | 0.81 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -0.02 | 1.63 | 2.99 | 13.84 | |||
| GPTGF | 0.75 | 0.04 | 0.01 | -0.16 | 1.46 | 2.30 | 15.03 | |||
| FBBPF | 3.22 | 0.28 | 0.07 | 1.64 | 3.82 | 6.58 | 17.03 | |||
| JREIF | 0.24 | 0.05 | 0.00 | -0.25 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 8.11 | |||
| AYAAF | 0.60 | 0.21 | 0.00 | -0.73 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 11.76 |
Fibra UNO Competitive Analysis
Competitive analysis of Fibra UNO helps investors understand the drivers behind Fibra UNO's financial results. Benchmarking Fibra UNO's performance against peers helps reveal whether its growth and profitability are sustainable.| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
Fibra UNO Peer Performance Charts
How to Analyze Fibra UNO Against Peers
Fibra UNO's peer analysis compares Fibra UNO with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This helps determine whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:- Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
- Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
- Check valuation dispersion: Review whether Fibra UNO trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
- Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
- Document the thesis: Record where Fibra UNO leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.