FIDELITY ADVISOR Competition
| FACTX Fund | USD 46.56 -1.05 -2.21% |
Pair Correlation for FIDELITY ADVISOR and IShares Home Snapshot
Significant diversification
Across the chosen horizon, FACTX and ITB show a correlation of 0.03 and fall into the Significant diversification bucket. The overlap area represents the portion of risk that may be diversified away when both instruments are held together and nothing else in the portfolio changes.
Moving against FIDELITY Mutual Fund
The degree to which FIDELITY ADVISOR's exhibits mean reversion depends on how efficiently the market prices new information. In highly covered equities, the mean reversion window tends to be shorter.
FIDELITY ADVISOR Competition Correlation Matrix
Correlation analysis between Fidelity Advisor Health and its competitors helps investors understand whether diversification is real or only superficial inside the same peer group. This matrix is most informative when investors want to know whether adding another peer would improve diversification, increase crowding, or leave total risk largely unchanged.
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
There is a big difference between FIDELITY Mutual Fund performing well and FIDELITY ADVISOR Mutual Fund doing well as a business compared to the competition. There are so many exceptions to the norm that investors cannot definitively determine what's good or bad unless they analyze FIDELITY ADVISOR's multiple risk-adjusted performance indicators across the competitive landscape. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FACDX | 0.75 | -0.12 | 0.00 | -11.35 | 0.00 | 1.62 | 3.72 | |||
| FHCCX | 0.75 | -0.11 | 0.00 | -0.25 | 0.00 | 1.63 | 4.04 | |||
| FELIX | 1.56 | 0.14 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 2.06 | 3.18 | 10.54 | |||
| EAGL | 0.66 | -0.03 | 0.00 | -0.08 | 0.00 | 0.88 | 4.45 | |||
| FBMPX | 0.94 | -0.02 | 0.00 | -0.07 | 0.00 | 1.55 | 11.88 | |||
| SQQQ | 2.33 | 0.15 | 0.12 | -0.11 | 2.42 | 5.58 | 12.45 | |||
| KRE | 1.09 | 0.03 | 0.00 | -0.02 | 0.00 | 1.99 | 9.80 | |||
| GRID | 0.87 | 0.15 | 0.12 | 0.12 | 1.09 | 1.83 | 7.20 | |||
| ITB | 1.27 | -0.06 | 0.00 | -0.10 | 0.00 | 3.47 | 9.66 |
FIDELITY ADVISOR Competitive Analysis
| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
Peer Performance Charts
How to Analyze FIDELITY ADVISOR Against Peers
FIDELITY ADVISOR's peer analysis compares FIDELITY ADVISOR with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This helps determine whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:- Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
- Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
- Check valuation dispersion: Review whether FIDELITY ADVISOR trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
- Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
- Document the thesis: Record where FIDELITY ADVISOR leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.