Frost Growth Competition
| FACEX Fund | USD 12.65 -0.01 -0.08% |
Pair Correlation for Frost Growth and Telecommunications Summary
Very good diversification
For the present investment horizon, the measured correlation between FACEX and FSTCX stands at -0.36, or Very good diversification. Used correctly, the chart helps investors judge whether adding the second position genuinely diversifies the first.
Moving together with Frost Mutual Fund
Mean reversion in Frost Growth's price occurs when temporary dislocations - caused by sentiment extremes, news events, or liquidity shocks - correct back toward the stock's historical fair value.
Frost Growth Competition Correlation Matrix
Reviewing how Frost Growth Equity moves relative to competing funds can show whether peer exposure is reducing portfolio risk or simply repeating the same market bet. The current classification points to the Large Growth category. In practical terms, lower correlation may offer better diversification while higher correlation may leave the portfolio more exposed to one shared driver.
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
Frost Growth Mutual Fund may look attractive on headline returns alone, but deeper analysis often tells a different story. A thorough review of Frost Growth's risk-adjusted indicators provides a clearer picture of whether returns are being earned efficiently. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DTLGX | 0.83 | -0.02 | 0.00 | -0.06 | 0.00 | 1.55 | 4.59 | |||
| WLCTX | 0.81 | 0.29 | 0.26 | 0.24 | 0.72 | 1.54 | 14.80 | |||
| BACAX | 0.87 | 0.44 | 0.47 | 5.44 | 0.45 | 1.99 | 4.45 | |||
| TWSCX | 0.29 | 0.01 | 0.00 | -0.03 | 0.00 | 0.53 | 1.93 | |||
| EGIIX | 0.74 | -0.16 | 0.00 | -0.43 | 0.00 | 1.24 | 4.49 | |||
| EXBAX | 0.35 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -0.03 | 0.00 | 0.69 | 1.74 | |||
| DFDPX | 0.71 | -0.11 | 0.00 | -0.17 | 0.00 | 1.27 | 5.05 | |||
| CILGX | 0.78 | -0.08 | 0.00 | -0.13 | 0.00 | 1.51 | 5.35 | |||
| FSTCX | 0.90 | 0.18 | 0.19 | 0.41 | 0.89 | 1.89 | 4.26 |
Frost Growth Competitive Analysis
| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
Frost Growth Competition Peer Performance Charts
How to Analyze Frost Growth Against Peers
Frost Growth's peer analysis compares Frost Growth with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This helps determine whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:- Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
- Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
- Check valuation dispersion: Review whether Frost Growth trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
- Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
- Document the thesis: Record where Frost Growth leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.
Peer Comparison Metrics & Methodology
Return on invested capital comparison for Frost Growth versus peers reveals which companies in the group are genuinely creating value versus just growing the top line. Comparing peers in Frost Funds, Large Growth Funds can help separate structural strengths from temporary momentum.
This section for Frost Growth Equity is built from fund disclosures and market reference feeds, with harmonization applied to align reporting definitions. Values may update on different source schedules.