Exchange Competitors
| EIF Stock | CAD 101.04 -0.67 -0.66% |
Exchange Income vs Chorus Aviation Correlation View
Poor diversification
The correlation between EIF and CHR is 0.65, which Macroaxis classifies as Poor diversification for the selected horizon. The overlap area represents the portion of risk that may be diversified away when both instruments are held together and nothing else in the portfolio changes.
Moving together with Exchange Stock
Moving against Exchange Stock
Mean reversion in Exchange Income's price occurs when temporary dislocations - caused by sentiment extremes, news events, or liquidity shocks - correct back toward the stock's historical fair value.
Exchange Income Competition Correlation Matrix
Correlation analysis between Exchange Income and its competitors helps investors understand whether diversification is real or only superficial inside the same peer group. This matrix is most informative when investors want to know whether adding another peer would improve diversification, increase crowding, or leave total risk largely unchanged.
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
There is a big difference between Exchange Stock performing well and Exchange Income Company doing well as a business compared to the competition. There are so many exceptions to the norm that investors cannot definitively determine what's good or bad unless they analyze Exchange Income's multiple risk-adjusted performance indicators across the competitive landscape. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SES | 1.34 | 0.16 | 0.09 | -0.39 | 1.52 | 2.85 | 7.01 | |||
| MDA | 2.70 | 0.82 | 0.27 | -4.64 | 2.40 | 6.32 | 20.58 | |||
| AC | 1.59 | -0.10 | 0.00 | -0.11 | 0.00 | 3.74 | 12.26 | |||
| ATS | 1.75 | 0.16 | 0.07 | -0.27 | 2.08 | 4.09 | 11.33 | |||
| BBU-UN | 1.66 | -0.15 | 0.00 | 0.34 | 0.00 | 3.54 | 10.87 | |||
| HPS-A | 2.02 | 0.13 | 0.05 | -0.48 | 2.26 | 4.63 | 12.41 | |||
| BDGI | 1.66 | -0.24 | 0.00 | 2.57 | 0.00 | 3.09 | 10.89 | |||
| RUS | 1.01 | 0.23 | 0.11 | 3.92 | 1.75 | 2.15 | 12.24 | |||
| CHR | 1.23 | 0.07 | 0.04 | -1.64 | 1.40 | 2.53 | 11.42 |
Exchange Income Competitive Analysis
Competitive analysis for Exchange Income involves evaluating how the company stacks up against its peers on key financial metrics. Investors who understand Exchange Income's competitive dynamics are better equipped to forecast its long-term value.| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
Exchange Income Peer Performance Charts
How to Analyze Exchange Income Against Peers
Exchange Income's peer analysis compares Exchange Income with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This helps determine whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:- Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
- Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
- Check valuation dispersion: Review whether Exchange Income trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
- Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
- Document the thesis: Record where Exchange Income leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.