Dimensional ETF Competition

DEXC Etf   65.64  0.00  0.00%   
Peers for Dimensional ETF Trust include American Century, IShares MSCI, Franklin FTSE, Invesco SAMPP, and Invesco SAMPP and others in the group. Peer context helps frame relative positioning. This module tests whether Dimensional ETF has durable advantages versus sector peers.

Dimensional ETF and Invesco Dynamic Correlation Summary

Good diversification
DEXC currently posts a -0.03 correlation with PBE, indicating a Good diversification relationship for the active sample. The overlap area represents the portion of risk that may be diversified away when both instruments are held together and nothing else in the portfolio changes.

Moving together with Dimensional Etf

  0.84VWO Vanguard FTSE EmergingPairCorr
  0.94IEMG iShares Core MSCIPairCorr
  0.89EMC Global X FundsPairCorr
  0.93EEM iShares MSCI EmergingPairCorr
  0.83SPEM SPDR Portfolio EmergingPairCorr

Moving against Dimensional Etf

  0.71MDBX Tradr 2X LongPairCorr
  0.62AVGG Leverage Shares 2XPairCorr
Specify up to 10 symbols:
Sophisticated investors, who have witnessed many market ups and downs, anticipate that the market will even out over time. This tendency of Dimensional ETF's price to converge to an average value over time is called mean reversion.
Hype
Prediction
LowEstimatedHigh
64.3565.6967.03
Details
Intrinsic
Valuation
LowRealHigh
64.2665.6066.94
Details
Naive
Forecast
LowNextHigh
64.3665.7067.03
Details
Bollinger
Band Projection (param)
LowerMiddle BandUpper
63.1167.7872.45
Details
Please note, it is not enough to conduct a financial or market analysis of a single entity such as Dimensional ETF. Your research has to be compared to or analyzed against Dimensional ETF's peers to derive any actionable benefits.

Dimensional ETF Competition Correlation Matrix

Competition correlation for Dimensional ETF Trust matters because related securities often respond to the same industry, factor, or macro drivers even when their business stories differ. The current classification points to the Diversified Emerging Mkts category. In practical terms, lower correlation may offer better diversification while higher correlation may leave the portfolio more exposed to one shared driver.

High positive correlations

ISMDRZV
ISMDDXUV
RZVDXUV
DXIVAVSD
DXIVFLKR
FLKRTHD
  

High negative correlations

PBEFLKR
PBETHD
PBERSPS
JSMLTHD
JSMLFLKR

Dimensional ETF Constituents Risk-Adjusted Indicators

There is a big difference between Dimensional Etf performing well and Dimensional ETF ETF doing well as a business compared to the competition. There are so many exceptions to the norm that investors cannot definitively determine what's good or bad unless they analyze Dimensional ETF's multiple risk-adjusted performance indicators across the competitive landscape. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.

Dimensional ETF Competitive Analysis

    
 Better Than Average     
    
 Worse Than Peers    View Performance Chart
DEXC DXUV AVSD THD FLKR RZV RSPS ISMD DXIV JSML
 0.00 
65.64
Dimensional
 1.33 
59.36
Dimensional
 0.04 
73.53
American
 0.86 
64.91
IShares
 0.26 
42.75
Franklin
 1.27 
120.89
Invesco
 0.70 
29.72
Invesco
 1.50 
39.34
Inspire
 1.38 
67.33
Dimensional
 0.99 
69.29
Janus
Market Volatility
(90 Days Market Risk)
Market Performance
(90 Days Performance)
Odds of Financial Distress
(Probability Of Bankruptcy)
Current Valuation
(Equity Enterprise Value)
Buy or Sell Analysis
(Average Analysts Consensus)
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Trade Advice
(90 Days Macroaxis Advice)
Price To Sales
Equity Positions Weight
Three Year Return
Net Asset
Price To Book
Five Year Return
One Year Return
Last Dividend Paid
Ten Year Return
Beta
Price To Earning
Day Typical Price
Accumulation Distribution
Market Facilitation Index
Daily Balance Of Power
Period Momentum Indicator
Rate Of Daily Change
Day Median Price
Price Action Indicator
Relative Strength Index
Coefficient Of Variation
Mean Deviation
Jensen Alpha
Total Risk Alpha
Sortino Ratio
Downside Variance
Standard Deviation
Kurtosis
Potential Upside
Treynor Ratio
Maximum Drawdown
Variance
Market Risk Adjusted Performance
Risk Adjusted Performance
Skewness
Semi Deviation
Information Ratio
Value At Risk
Expected Short fall
Downside Deviation
Semi Variance

Dimensional ETF Competition Peer Performance Charts

How to Analyze Dimensional ETF Against Peers

Dimensional ETF's peer analysis compares Dimensional ETF with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This helps determine whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:
  • Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
  • Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
  • Check valuation dispersion: Review whether Dimensional ETF trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
  • Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
  • Document the thesis: Record where Dimensional ETF leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.
Use this as an educational baseline, then validate conclusions with current filings, market conditions, and portfolio objectives.

Peer Comparison Metrics & Methodology

Momentum comparison for Dimensional ETF across peers can signal rotation - when peers accelerate while Dimensional ETF lags or vice versa, the divergence often has a fundamental explanation. Relative comparison helps show where Dimensional ETF is stronger or weaker against peers.

Unless otherwise specified, data for Dimensional ETF Trust is compiled from fund disclosures and market reference feeds and standardized for comparability. Updates may occur throughout the day.

This content is curated and reviewed by:

Ellen Johnson - Member of Macroaxis Editorial Board
Last reviewed on February 22nd, 2026