DBO Competitors
| DBO Stock | CAD 0.70 -0.02 -2.78% |
D Box Market Correlation Snapshot
Significant diversification
Across the chosen horizon, DBO and DJI show a correlation of 0.02 and fall into the Significant diversification bucket. In portfolio terms, the overlap visualization shows how much shared movement remains after both positions are combined.
Moving together with DBO Stock
Moving against DBO Stock
Investors who believe in mean reversion view D Box's price extremes not as permanent states but as temporary dislocations that create opportunities for disciplined, contrarian capital allocation.
D Box Competition Correlation Matrix
Correlation analysis between D Box Technologies and its competitors helps investors understand whether diversification is real or only superficial inside the same peer group. This matrix is most informative when investors want to know whether adding another peer would improve diversification, increase crowding, or leave total risk largely unchanged.
| 0.12 | 0.2 | 0.01 | -0.06 | -0.07 | MHUB | ||
| 0.12 | 0.72 | 0.68 | -0.66 | -0.48 | NCI | ||
| 0.2 | 0.72 | 0.78 | -0.48 | -0.66 | BRAG | ||
| 0.01 | 0.68 | 0.78 | -0.46 | -0.69 | ONE | ||
| -0.06 | -0.66 | -0.48 | -0.46 | 0.23 | BEW | ||
| -0.07 | -0.48 | -0.66 | -0.69 | 0.23 | QTRH | ||
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
There is a big difference between DBO Stock performing well and D Box Company doing well as a business compared to the competition. There are so many exceptions to the norm that investors cannot definitively determine what's good or bad unless they analyze D Box's multiple risk-adjusted performance indicators across the competitive landscape. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MHUB | 3.56 | -0.16 | 0.00 | -0.20 | 0.00 | 6.76 | 30.66 | |||
| NCI | 2.77 | -0.52 | 0.00 | -40.25 | 0.00 | 5.00 | 14.25 | |||
| BRAG | 2.35 | -0.51 | 0.00 | -0.76 | 0.00 | 3.45 | 24.27 | |||
| ONE | 5.08 | -0.47 | 0.00 | -2.45 | 0.00 | 13.33 | 27.82 | |||
| BEW | 1.64 | 0.10 | 0.05 | -0.97 | 2.17 | 3.45 | 8.26 | |||
| QTRH | 2.05 | 0.24 | 0.08 | 0.44 | 2.54 | 5.26 | 15.35 |
D Box Competitive Analysis
Sizing up D Box against Minehub Technologies, NTG Clarity, and Bragg Gaming reveals meaningful differences in scale and efficiency. At a 140.1 M valuation, D Box brings in 42.8 M on the top line. A 41.33% return on equity and 13.24% net margin underscore D Box's earnings capacity. Revenue tilts toward D Box at 42.8 M compared with 2.0 M. D Box commands the larger valuation at 140.1 M versus 47.8 M. D Box converts shareholder equity more efficiently at 41.33% versus Bragg Gaming at -11.07%.| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
Peer Performance Charts
How to Analyze D Box Against Peers
D Box's peer analysis compares D Box with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This helps determine whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:- Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
- Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
- Check valuation dispersion: Review whether D Box trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
- Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
- Document the thesis: Record where D Box leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.