AdvisorShares Focused Competition
| CWS Etf | USD 65.14 0.41 0.63% |
Pair Correlation for AdvisorShares Focused and Invesco Bloomberg Summary
Poor diversification
For the present investment horizon, the measured correlation between AdvisorShares Focused and Invesco Bloomberg stands at 0.67, or Poor diversification. The overlap area shows the portion of risk that can be diversified away by holding both instruments together.
Moving together with AdvisorShares Etf
Moving against AdvisorShares Etf
Mean reversion in AdvisorShares Focused's price occurs when temporary dislocations correct back toward historical fair value. This tendency of AdvisorShares Focused's price to converge to an average value over time is called mean reversion. Whether book value, historical earnings multiple, or sector median, the reference point matters for AdvisorShares Focused's analysis.
AdvisorShares Focused Competition Correlation Matrix
Correlation analysis between AdvisorShares Focused Equity and its competitors provides context for understanding whether diversification is real or only superficial inside the same peer group. The useful question is whether competitors are behaving like true alternatives or simply tracking the same sector move with different volatility.
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
AdvisorShares Focused Constituents Risk-Adjusted Indicators
Return momentum in AdvisorShares Etf is more useful when tested against peer-relative fundamentals and risk. Peer-relative risk metrics add context on drawdown behavior, consistency, and return quality. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors evaluate volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across different positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 0.75 | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.05 | 0.87 | 1.30 | 4.70 | |||
| BVAL | 0.51 | 0.06 | 0.10 | 0.02 | 0.70 | 0.93 | 3.27 | |||
| NFTY | 0.78 | -0.12 | 0.00 | -0.23 | 0.00 | 1.85 | 5.58 | |||
| LFGY | 2.18 | -0.07 | 0.00 | 0.06 | 0.00 | 4.14 | 13.67 | |||
| CZA | 0.65 | 0.03 | 0.00 | -0.03 | 0.00 | 1.34 | 3.56 | |||
| OVL | 0.74 | 0.05 | 0.05 | -0.01 | 1.05 | 1.39 | 4.66 | |||
| NZAC | 0.68 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -0.07 | 0.00 | 0.98 | 4.05 | |||
| BKCI | 0.74 | -0.01 | 0.00 | -0.07 | 0.00 | 1.35 | 4.09 | |||
| BFOR | 0.77 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.01 | 0.98 | 1.69 | 4.66 | |||
| POWA | 0.62 | -0.02 | 0.00 | -0.09 | 0.00 | 1.05 | 4.06 |
AdvisorShares Focused Competitive Analysis
| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
AdvisorShares Focused Competition Peer Performance Charts
How to Analyze AdvisorShares Focused Against Peers
AdvisorShares Focused's peer analysis compares AdvisorShares Focused with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This helps determine whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:- Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
- Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
- Check valuation dispersion: Review whether AdvisorShares Focused trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
- Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
- Document the thesis: Record where AdvisorShares Focused leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.
Peer Comparison Metrics & Methodology
AdvisorShares Focused's capital allocation track record stands out when measured by cumulative returns on acquisitions versus peers. Geographic revenue mix for AdvisorShares Focused versus peers affects currency exposure and growth opportunity differently. This section is designed to make peer positioning easier to interpret at a glance.
AdvisorShares Focused Equity metrics are compiled from fund disclosures and market reference feeds and normalized before display. Not all fields update in real time.