COLUMBIA SELECT Competition
| CSPIX Fund | USD 12.24 -0.20 -1.61% |
Correlation: COLUMBIA SELECT vs Gabelli Global Overview
Poor diversification
Across the chosen horizon, CSPIX and GCFSX show a correlation of 0.76 and fall into the Poor diversification bucket. The cleaner interpretation is to review correlation beside volatility, expected return, and the role each holding plays in the portfolio.
Moving together with COLUMBIA Mutual Fund
The mean reversion principle applied to COLUMBIA SELECT's suggests that neither prolonged outperformance nor underperformance is permanent. Investors exploit this by positioning against extremes in price relative to fundamental value.
COLUMBIA SELECT Competition Correlation Matrix
Studying peer correlation around Columbia Select Large gives investors a cleaner read on how much independent price behavior still exists across the competitive set. This matrix is most informative when investors want to know whether adding another peer would improve diversification, increase crowding, or leave total risk largely unchanged.
| 0.95 | 0.95 | 0.99 | 0.98 | 0.64 | DFFCX | ||
| 0.95 | 1.0 | 0.93 | 0.92 | 0.77 | ICFSX | ||
| 0.95 | 1.0 | 0.93 | 0.92 | 0.77 | ICFAX | ||
| 0.99 | 0.93 | 0.93 | 0.99 | 0.61 | FIDSX | ||
| 0.98 | 0.92 | 0.92 | 0.99 | 0.56 | SBFAX | ||
| 0.64 | 0.77 | 0.77 | 0.61 | 0.56 | GCFSX | ||
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
There is a big difference between COLUMBIA Mutual Fund performing well and COLUMBIA SELECT Mutual Fund doing well as a business compared to the competition. Risk-adjusted metrics allow investors to compare COLUMBIA SELECT's efficiency and downside exposure against peers in a more meaningful way. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DFFCX | 0.81 | -0.07 | 0.00 | -0.17 | 0.00 | 1.14 | 5.37 | |||
| ICFSX | 0.70 | -0.07 | 0.00 | -0.18 | 0.00 | 1.51 | 4.70 | |||
| ICFAX | 0.69 | -0.08 | 0.00 | -0.19 | 0.00 | 1.47 | 4.61 | |||
| FIDSX | 0.88 | -0.05 | 0.00 | -0.14 | 0.00 | 1.45 | 6.16 | |||
| SBFAX | 0.74 | -0.06 | 0.00 | -0.16 | 0.00 | 1.49 | 5.03 | |||
| GCFSX | 0.63 | -0.01 | 0.00 | -0.11 | 0.00 | 0.98 | 3.16 |
COLUMBIA SELECT Competitive Analysis
| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
COLUMBIA SELECT Competition Peer Performance Charts
How to Analyze COLUMBIA SELECT Against Peers
COLUMBIA SELECT's peer analysis compares COLUMBIA SELECT with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This helps determine whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:- Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
- Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
- Check valuation dispersion: Review whether COLUMBIA SELECT trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
- Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
- Document the thesis: Record where COLUMBIA SELECT leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.
Peer Comparison Metrics & Methodology
The competition view for COLUMBIA SELECT includes correlation data, showing which peers are financially similar and which ones move together in the market. Liquidity and float comparison across COLUMBIA SELECT's peers frames which names in the competitive set are more or less accessible for large positions. Standalone ratios for COLUMBIA SELECT can be misleading without the industry context that peer comparison provides. Relative analysis can highlight whether current pricing already reflects peer-group strengths or weaknesses.
Inputs for Columbia Select Large come from fund disclosures and market reference feeds and are mapped into a consistent schema for analysis. Some fields can appear with publication lag.