COSCO Competitors
| CSCMY Stock | USD 0.48 0.01 2.13% |
Correlation: COSCO SHIPPING vs PGG Wrightson Details
Moving against COSCO Pink Sheet
While mean reversion in COSCO SHIPPING is a statistically observable tendency, it operates on uncertain timelines. Positions sized too aggressively against the trend can suffer sustained losses before reversion occurs.
COSCO SHIPPING Competition Correlation Matrix
Correlation analysis between COSCO SHIPPING International and its competitors helps investors understand whether diversification is real or only superficial inside the same peer group. This matrix is most informative when investors want to know whether adding another peer would improve diversification, increase crowding, or leave total risk largely unchanged.
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
There is a big difference between COSCO Pink Sheet performing well and COSCO SHIPPING Company doing well as a business compared to the competition. There are so many exceptions to the norm that investors cannot definitively determine what's good or bad unless they analyze COSCO SHIPPING's multiple risk-adjusted performance indicators across the competitive landscape. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DBMG | 1.89 | 0.98 | 0.00 | 9.99 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 48.84 | |||
| TGHLF | 0.49 | 0.07 | 0.09 | -2.34 | 0.48 | 1.50 | 6.04 | |||
| AFGYF | 3.01 | 0.33 | 0.03 | -0.49 | 4.63 | 8.33 | 56.86 | |||
| FTGFF | 2.77 | 0.97 | 0.27 | -3.48 | 2.47 | 7.01 | 16.78 | |||
| BUKS | 2.58 | 0.76 | 0.31 | -4.77 | 1.96 | 7.27 | 22.24 | |||
| AGXXF | 1.99 | -0.66 | 0.00 | 0.78 | 0.00 | 2.55 | 36.41 | |||
| ARTGF | 2.47 | -1.18 | 0.00 | -0.70 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 82.91 | |||
| QNTFF | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||
| SKUYF | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||
| PGWFF | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
COSCO SHIPPING Competitive Analysis
COSCO SHIPPING competes directly with DBM Global, Textainer Group, and AFC Energy, and the financial data points to clear areas of divergence. On scale alone, COSCO SHIPPING's 341.5 M valuation and 198.5 M revenue define its weight class. The company converts revenue to profit at a 15.04% rate and delivers 5.29% on shareholder equity. Profit margins tilt toward COSCO SHIPPING at 15.04% against DBM Global at 4.13%. COSCO SHIPPING commands the larger valuation at 341.5 M versus 49.1 M. COSCO SHIPPING pulls in 198.5 M in revenue while the other reports 592,800.| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
Peer Performance Charts
How to Analyze COSCO SHIPPING Against Peers
COSCO SHIPPING's peer analysis compares COSCO SHIPPING with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This helps determine whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:- Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
- Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
- Check valuation dispersion: Review whether COSCO SHIPPING trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
- Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
- Document the thesis: Record where COSCO SHIPPING leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.